TicToc: Time Traveling Optimistic Concurrency Control

Xiangyao Yu, Andrew Pavlo, Daniel Sánchez, S. Devadas
{"title":"TicToc: Time Traveling Optimistic Concurrency Control","authors":"Xiangyao Yu, Andrew Pavlo, Daniel Sánchez, S. Devadas","doi":"10.1145/2882903.2882935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Concurrency control for on-line transaction processing (OLTP) database management systems (DBMSs) is a nasty game. Achieving higher performance on emerging many-core systems is difficult. Previous research has shown that timestamp management is the key scalability bottleneck in concurrency control algorithms. This prevents the system from scaling to large numbers of cores. In this paper we present TicToc, a new optimistic concurrency control algorithm that avoids the scalability and concurrency bottlenecks of prior T/O schemes. TicToc relies on a novel and provably correct data-driven timestamp management protocol. Instead of assigning timestamps to transactions, this protocol assigns read and write timestamps to data items and uses them to lazily compute a valid commit timestamp for each transaction. TicToc removes the need for centralized timestamp allocation, and commits transactions that would be aborted by conventional T/O schemes. We implemented TicToc along with four other concurrency control algorithms in an in-memory, shared-everything OLTP DBMS and compared their performance on different workloads. Our results show that TicToc achieves up to 92% better throughput while reducing the abort rate by 3.3x over these previous algorithms.","PeriodicalId":20483,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Management of Data","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"142","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Management of Data","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2882903.2882935","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 142

Abstract

Concurrency control for on-line transaction processing (OLTP) database management systems (DBMSs) is a nasty game. Achieving higher performance on emerging many-core systems is difficult. Previous research has shown that timestamp management is the key scalability bottleneck in concurrency control algorithms. This prevents the system from scaling to large numbers of cores. In this paper we present TicToc, a new optimistic concurrency control algorithm that avoids the scalability and concurrency bottlenecks of prior T/O schemes. TicToc relies on a novel and provably correct data-driven timestamp management protocol. Instead of assigning timestamps to transactions, this protocol assigns read and write timestamps to data items and uses them to lazily compute a valid commit timestamp for each transaction. TicToc removes the need for centralized timestamp allocation, and commits transactions that would be aborted by conventional T/O schemes. We implemented TicToc along with four other concurrency control algorithms in an in-memory, shared-everything OLTP DBMS and compared their performance on different workloads. Our results show that TicToc achieves up to 92% better throughput while reducing the abort rate by 3.3x over these previous algorithms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TicToc:时间旅行乐观并发控制
联机事务处理(OLTP)数据库管理系统(dbms)的并发控制是一个棘手的问题。在新兴的多核系统上实现更高的性能是很困难的。以往的研究表明,时间戳管理是并发控制算法中关键的可扩展性瓶颈。这可以防止系统扩展到大量的内核。本文提出了一种新的乐观并发控制算法TicToc,它避免了现有T/O方案的可扩展性和并发性瓶颈。TicToc依赖于一种新颖且可证明正确的数据驱动的时间戳管理协议。该协议没有为事务分配时间戳,而是为数据项分配读和写时间戳,并使用它们惰性地计算每个事务的有效提交时间戳。TicToc消除了对集中时间戳分配的需求,并提交了可能被传统的T/O方案中止的事务。我们在一个内存中、共享一切的OLTP DBMS中实现了TicToc和其他四种并发控制算法,并比较了它们在不同工作负载下的性能。我们的研究结果表明,与之前的算法相比,TicToc的吞吐量提高了92%,同时将中断率降低了3.3倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Experimental Comparison of Thirteen Relational Equi-Joins in Main Memory Rheem: Enabling Multi-Platform Task Execution Wander Join: Online Aggregation for Joins Graph Summarization for Geo-correlated Trends Detection in Social Networks Emma in Action: Declarative Dataflows for Scalable Data Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1