“Pain talk”: A triadic collaboration in which nurses promote opportunities for engaging children and their parents about managing children’s pain

A. Jordan, B. Carter, K. Vasileiou
{"title":"“Pain talk”: A triadic collaboration in which nurses promote opportunities for engaging children and their parents about managing children’s pain","authors":"A. Jordan, B. Carter, K. Vasileiou","doi":"10.1002/pne2.12061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Effective communication with children about pain is important and has the potential to mediate the short‐ and longer‐term effects of pain on children. Most communication studies relating to children's pain have focused on language children use to describe everyday pain experiences. However, little is known regarding how health professionals, particularly nurses, communicate with children in healthcare settings about pain. This study aimed to explore how nurses talk to children and their parents about pain and what factors influence nurses’ use of language and non‐verbal communication. A cross‐sectional mixed‐methods (predominantly qualitative) survey (“pain talk”) was conducted, comprising qualitative items about pain communication and four vignettes portraying hypothetical cases of children representing typical child pain scenarios. Participants were recruited via email, social media, newsletters, established networks, and personal contacts. A total of 141 registered (68.1%) or in‐training nurses across 11 countries with experience of managing children's pain completed the survey. Textual survey responses were analyzed using conventional qualitative content analysis. Qualitative content analysis generated a meta‐theme “Being confident and knowing how to do ‘pain talk’” and four main themes that described the functions, purpose, and delivery of “pain talk”: (a) “contextualizing and assessing,” (b) “empowering, explaining, and educating,” (c) “supporting, affirming, and confirming,” and (d) “protecting, distracting, and restoring.” “Pain talk” was a triadic collaborative communication process that required nurses to feel confident about their role and skills. This process involved nurses talking to children and parents about pain and creating engagement opportunities for children and parents. “Pain talk” aimed to promote the agency of the child and parent and their engagement in discussions and decision‐making, using information, support, and comfort. Nurses shaped their “pain talk” to the specific context of the child's pain, previous experiences, and current concerns to minimize potential distress and adverse effects and to promote optimal pain management.","PeriodicalId":19634,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric & Neonatal Pain","volume":"1 1","pages":"123 - 133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatric & Neonatal Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pne2.12061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Effective communication with children about pain is important and has the potential to mediate the short‐ and longer‐term effects of pain on children. Most communication studies relating to children's pain have focused on language children use to describe everyday pain experiences. However, little is known regarding how health professionals, particularly nurses, communicate with children in healthcare settings about pain. This study aimed to explore how nurses talk to children and their parents about pain and what factors influence nurses’ use of language and non‐verbal communication. A cross‐sectional mixed‐methods (predominantly qualitative) survey (“pain talk”) was conducted, comprising qualitative items about pain communication and four vignettes portraying hypothetical cases of children representing typical child pain scenarios. Participants were recruited via email, social media, newsletters, established networks, and personal contacts. A total of 141 registered (68.1%) or in‐training nurses across 11 countries with experience of managing children's pain completed the survey. Textual survey responses were analyzed using conventional qualitative content analysis. Qualitative content analysis generated a meta‐theme “Being confident and knowing how to do ‘pain talk’” and four main themes that described the functions, purpose, and delivery of “pain talk”: (a) “contextualizing and assessing,” (b) “empowering, explaining, and educating,” (c) “supporting, affirming, and confirming,” and (d) “protecting, distracting, and restoring.” “Pain talk” was a triadic collaborative communication process that required nurses to feel confident about their role and skills. This process involved nurses talking to children and parents about pain and creating engagement opportunities for children and parents. “Pain talk” aimed to promote the agency of the child and parent and their engagement in discussions and decision‐making, using information, support, and comfort. Nurses shaped their “pain talk” to the specific context of the child's pain, previous experiences, and current concerns to minimize potential distress and adverse effects and to promote optimal pain management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“疼痛谈话”:一种三方合作,护士促进儿童及其父母参与管理儿童疼痛的机会
与儿童就疼痛进行有效的沟通是很重要的,并且有可能调节疼痛对儿童的短期和长期影响。大多数关于儿童疼痛的交流研究都集中在儿童用来描述日常疼痛经历的语言上。然而,关于卫生专业人员,特别是护士如何与医疗机构中的儿童就疼痛进行沟通,人们知之甚少。本研究旨在探讨护士如何与儿童及其父母谈论疼痛,以及影响护士使用语言和非语言沟通的因素。横断面混合方法(主要是定性的)调查(“疼痛谈话”)进行,包括关于疼痛沟通的定性项目和四个描述典型儿童疼痛情景的儿童假想案例的小插曲。参与者是通过电子邮件、社交媒体、时事通讯、已建立的网络和个人联系招募的。共有来自11个国家的141名注册护士(68.1%)或正在接受培训的护士完成了调查,这些护士具有管理儿童疼痛的经验。文本调查结果分析采用传统的定性内容分析。定性内容分析产生了一个元主题“自信并知道如何做‘痛苦谈话’”和四个主要主题,描述了“痛苦谈话”的功能、目的和传递:(a)“情境化和评估”,(b)“授权、解释和教育”,(c)“支持、肯定和确认”,以及(d)“保护、转移注意力和恢复”。“疼痛谈话”是一个三方协作的沟通过程,需要护士对自己的角色和技能有信心。在这个过程中,护士与孩子和父母谈论疼痛,并为孩子和父母创造参与的机会。“痛苦谈话”旨在通过提供信息、支持和安慰,促进儿童和家长参与讨论和决策。护士根据儿童疼痛的具体情况、以前的经历和当前的担忧来塑造他们的“疼痛谈话”,以尽量减少潜在的痛苦和不良影响,并促进最佳的疼痛管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Perceived distress due to nasopharyngeal swab collection: Correspondence. "You just want someone to help": Outcomes that matter to parents when their child is treated for chronic pain. Prevalence of chronic pain in children and adolescents with psychiatric conditions. Positive effects of a child-centered intervention on children's fear and pain during needle procedures. Overview of radiotherapy-induced chronic pain in childhood cancer survivors: A narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1