[Effects of postoperative restrictive fluid management on recovery of gastrointestinal function after elective colonic resection].

Chang Liu, Qun Rao, Jian-guo Li, Zhao-hui Du, Qing Zhou, Hui Liang, Bo Hu, Lu Li, Jing Wang, Shuhan Cai
{"title":"[Effects of postoperative restrictive fluid management on recovery of gastrointestinal function after elective colonic resection].","authors":"Chang Liu, Qun Rao, Jian-guo Li, Zhao-hui Du, Qing Zhou, Hui Liang, Bo Hu, Lu Li, Jing Wang, Shuhan Cai","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1003-0603.2012.09.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo investigate the effect of postoperative restrictive fluid management by ensuring adequate tissue perfusion on the recovery of gastrointestinal function after elective colonic resection.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThirty patients suffered with elective colonic resection, after 6 hours of anesthesia recovery, were randomly divided into restrictive fluid management group (restrictive group, n=15) and traditional fluid management group (control group, n=15). From the surgery day to the 4th postoperative day, patients in restrictive group and control group received the total fluids of 25-35 ml×kg(-1)×d(-1) or 40-50 ml×kg(-1)×d(-1) respectively. Fluid balance, tissue perfusion, gastrointestinal function recovery time and the imbalance of fluid and electrolyte were recorded.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe total fluid input and net fluid balance in restrictive group were significantly fewer than those in control group (total fluid input: 1782.56±258.38 ml/d vs. 2707.50±294.64 ml/d, net fluid balance: 316.67±202.86 ml/d vs. 623.33±244.38 ml/d, both P<0.05), and central venous pressure (CVP) was significantly lower than that in control group (4.03±1.81 mm Hg vs. 6.47±3.09 mm Hg, P<0.05). There were no differences in heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) between two groups (HR: 85.03±13.49 bpm vs. 81.44±12.49 bpm, MAP: 80.65±11.39 mm Hg vs. 82.38±8.28 mm Hg, both P>0.05). The lactate clearance rate of the first postoperative 24 hours in restrictive group was higher than that in control group [35 (17, 53)% vs. 17 (-6, 33)%, P<0.05]. The times of bowel sounds recovery, the first flatus and stool passed in restrictive group were shorter than those in control group (bowel sounds: 37.43±24.97 hours vs. 46.36±19.34 hours, flatus: 53.63±12.78 hours vs. 75.43±20.07 hours, stool: 78.73±46.48 hours vs. 93.40±41.08 hours, all P<0.05). Vomiting was reduced in the restrictive group compared with control group (2 vs. 7, P<0.05). There were no differences in the occurrences of electrolyte imbalance (5 vs. 3), fluid insufficient (2 vs. 0) and fluid overload (0 vs. 1) between the two groups.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe postoperative restrictive fluid management by ensuring tissue perfusion can shorten the gastrointestinal function recovery time after elective colonic resection, and may not increase the incidence of water and electrolyte disorders.","PeriodicalId":23992,"journal":{"name":"Zhongguo wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue = Chinese critical care medicine = Zhongguo weizhongbing jijiuyixue","volume":"47 1","pages":"526-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhongguo wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue = Chinese critical care medicine = Zhongguo weizhongbing jijiuyixue","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1003-0603.2012.09.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To investigate the effect of postoperative restrictive fluid management by ensuring adequate tissue perfusion on the recovery of gastrointestinal function after elective colonic resection. METHODS Thirty patients suffered with elective colonic resection, after 6 hours of anesthesia recovery, were randomly divided into restrictive fluid management group (restrictive group, n=15) and traditional fluid management group (control group, n=15). From the surgery day to the 4th postoperative day, patients in restrictive group and control group received the total fluids of 25-35 ml×kg(-1)×d(-1) or 40-50 ml×kg(-1)×d(-1) respectively. Fluid balance, tissue perfusion, gastrointestinal function recovery time and the imbalance of fluid and electrolyte were recorded. RESULTS The total fluid input and net fluid balance in restrictive group were significantly fewer than those in control group (total fluid input: 1782.56±258.38 ml/d vs. 2707.50±294.64 ml/d, net fluid balance: 316.67±202.86 ml/d vs. 623.33±244.38 ml/d, both P<0.05), and central venous pressure (CVP) was significantly lower than that in control group (4.03±1.81 mm Hg vs. 6.47±3.09 mm Hg, P<0.05). There were no differences in heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) between two groups (HR: 85.03±13.49 bpm vs. 81.44±12.49 bpm, MAP: 80.65±11.39 mm Hg vs. 82.38±8.28 mm Hg, both P>0.05). The lactate clearance rate of the first postoperative 24 hours in restrictive group was higher than that in control group [35 (17, 53)% vs. 17 (-6, 33)%, P<0.05]. The times of bowel sounds recovery, the first flatus and stool passed in restrictive group were shorter than those in control group (bowel sounds: 37.43±24.97 hours vs. 46.36±19.34 hours, flatus: 53.63±12.78 hours vs. 75.43±20.07 hours, stool: 78.73±46.48 hours vs. 93.40±41.08 hours, all P<0.05). Vomiting was reduced in the restrictive group compared with control group (2 vs. 7, P<0.05). There were no differences in the occurrences of electrolyte imbalance (5 vs. 3), fluid insufficient (2 vs. 0) and fluid overload (0 vs. 1) between the two groups. CONCLUSION The postoperative restrictive fluid management by ensuring tissue perfusion can shorten the gastrointestinal function recovery time after elective colonic resection, and may not increase the incidence of water and electrolyte disorders.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[择期结肠切除术后限制性液体管理对胃肠功能恢复的影响]。
目的探讨术后限制性液体管理对选择性结肠切除术后胃肠功能恢复的影响。方法30例择期结肠切除术患者,麻醉恢复6 h后,随机分为限制性液体管理组(限制性组,n=15)和传统液体管理组(对照组,n=15)。从手术当日至术后第4天,限制组和对照组患者的总液体分别为25-35 ml×kg(-1)×d(-1)或40-50 ml×kg(-1)×d(-1)。记录体液平衡、组织灌注、胃肠功能恢复时间及体液电解质失衡情况。结果限制组患者总液体输入量和净液体平衡显著低于对照组(总液体输入量:1782.56±258.38 ml/d vs. 2707.50±294.64 ml/d,净液体平衡:316.67±202.86 ml/d vs. 623.33±244.38 ml/d,均p < 0.05)。限制组术后第24小时乳酸清除率高于对照组[35(17.53)%比17 (- 6.33)%,P<0.05]。限制组患儿肠音恢复时间、首次排便时间、排便时间均短于对照组(排便时间:37.43±24.97 h∶46.36±19.34 h;排便时间:53.63±12.78 h∶75.43±20.07 h;排便时间:78.73±46.48 h∶93.40±41.08 h, P均<0.05)。与对照组相比,限制组呕吐减少(2比7,P<0.05)。在电解质失衡(5 vs. 3)、液体不足(2 vs. 0)和液体过载(0 vs. 1)的发生率方面,两组之间没有差异。结论保证组织灌注的术后限制性液体管理可缩短择期结肠切除术后胃肠功能恢复时间,且不会增加水电解质紊乱的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Early treatment of atelectasis by bronchoscopy in craniotomy patients]. [Effects of ulinastatin on Toll like receptor 4 expression in endotoxin induced myocardial injury rats]. [Evaluation of circulating microRNA-92a for endothelial damage induced by percutaneous coronary intervention]. [The predictive values of D-dimer for the early prognosis of the acute myocardial infarction (AMI): a review of 3134 AMI patients]. [Correlation between osteoprotegerin gene 209G/A, 245T/G and 1181G/C polymorphism and acute coronary syndromes in Han people of Fujian area].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1