{"title":"Two mysterious guests: E. A. Poe's \"The raven\" and L. Kostić's \"In memory of ruvarac\"","authors":"Miloš Mihailović","doi":"10.5937/reci2114100m","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Laza Kostić is one of the most distinguished poets in Serbian literature. \"Spomen na Ruvarca\"/\"In memory of Ruvarac\", chosen by Bogdan Popović for his famous Anthology, is one of Kostić's poems where tendencies for suprising motifs and inovations of form are extremely prominent. In this paper I offered a comparative reading of \"Spomen na Ruvarca\" and Edgar Allan Poe's \"The Raven\"; Poe's poem is similar to Kostić's in regard to the atmosphere, motifs and theatrical narration and dialogue. In order to understand \"The Raven\", I have analysed Poe's autopoetic essay \"The Philosophy of Composition\". The explanation of \"The Raven's\" genesis offered in this essay is not necessarily indisputable, as I explained in the paper. Bearing this in mind, I declined the evident yet superficial connection between \"The Raven\" and Kostić's \"Santa Maria della Salute\", based on the formal similarities, and chose to follow Srba Ignjatović's suggestion that \"Spomen na Ruvarca\" should be read in comparison with \"The Raven\". I have compared the formal characteristics of these poems, showing both their differences and similarities. However, I found the most profound link between the poems in the atmosphere of mystery and horror, suggestive symbols and examination of metaphysics. By using the characters of 'mysterious guests' - the Raven and the skeleton of Kosta Ruvarac -these poets offered a meditation on the problem of the life after death. Neither Poe nor Kostić gave any ultimate answer, choosing to accentuate the impossibility of communication with the dead and determining the truth about life after death. The contact with the dead thus serves a role of a mere counterpoint which just further emphasizes the said impossibility.","PeriodicalId":33797,"journal":{"name":"Reci Beograd","volume":"36 9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reci Beograd","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/reci2114100m","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Laza Kostić is one of the most distinguished poets in Serbian literature. "Spomen na Ruvarca"/"In memory of Ruvarac", chosen by Bogdan Popović for his famous Anthology, is one of Kostić's poems where tendencies for suprising motifs and inovations of form are extremely prominent. In this paper I offered a comparative reading of "Spomen na Ruvarca" and Edgar Allan Poe's "The Raven"; Poe's poem is similar to Kostić's in regard to the atmosphere, motifs and theatrical narration and dialogue. In order to understand "The Raven", I have analysed Poe's autopoetic essay "The Philosophy of Composition". The explanation of "The Raven's" genesis offered in this essay is not necessarily indisputable, as I explained in the paper. Bearing this in mind, I declined the evident yet superficial connection between "The Raven" and Kostić's "Santa Maria della Salute", based on the formal similarities, and chose to follow Srba Ignjatović's suggestion that "Spomen na Ruvarca" should be read in comparison with "The Raven". I have compared the formal characteristics of these poems, showing both their differences and similarities. However, I found the most profound link between the poems in the atmosphere of mystery and horror, suggestive symbols and examination of metaphysics. By using the characters of 'mysterious guests' - the Raven and the skeleton of Kosta Ruvarac -these poets offered a meditation on the problem of the life after death. Neither Poe nor Kostić gave any ultimate answer, choosing to accentuate the impossibility of communication with the dead and determining the truth about life after death. The contact with the dead thus serves a role of a mere counterpoint which just further emphasizes the said impossibility.
拉扎·科斯蒂奇是塞尔维亚文学史上最杰出的诗人之一。波波维奇在其著名诗集《纪念鲁瓦拉克》中选择的《纪念鲁瓦拉克》是科斯季奇的诗歌之一,其主题的惊人倾向和形式的创新非常突出。本文对爱伦·坡的《渡鸦》和《鲁瓦尔卡的女人》进行了比较阅读;坡的诗歌在气氛、母题、戏剧叙事和对话等方面都与科斯蒂奇的相似。为了更好地理解《渡鸦》,笔者分析了坡的自创散文《写作哲学》。正如我在论文中所解释的那样,本文对《乌鸦》起源的解释不一定是无可争议的。考虑到这一点,基于形式上的相似性,我拒绝了《乌鸦》和科斯季奇的《致敬的圣玛利亚》之间明显而肤浅的联系,并选择遵循Srba ignjatovovic的建议,即《Spomen na Ruvarca》应该与《乌鸦》进行比较阅读。我比较了这些诗歌的形式特征,指出了它们的异同。然而,我发现这些诗在神秘和恐怖的气氛中,暗示性的符号和对形而上学的审视之间有着最深刻的联系。通过使用“神秘客人”的角色——乌鸦和科斯塔·鲁瓦拉克的骨架——这些诗人提供了对死后生活问题的思考。坡和科斯季奇都没有给出最终的答案,而是选择强调与死者沟通的不可能性,并确定死后生活的真相。因此,与死者的接触只是一种对应物,进一步强调了所说的不可能性。