Great houses for whom?: Chacoan monumental architecture in cross-cultural, cognitive, and ethnohistorical perspective

R. Weiner, E. Smith
{"title":"Great houses for whom?: Chacoan monumental architecture in cross-cultural, cognitive, and ethnohistorical perspective","authors":"R. Weiner, E. Smith","doi":"10.1080/1751696X.2021.1918390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper offers a new interpretation of Chacoan Great Houses, multistoried masonry structures of the 9th-12th century U.S. Southwest, using insights from animist ontologies, cognitive science, cross-cultural analysis, and ethnohistory. Throughout time and space, societies have constructed buildings to serve as dwelling places for animate, divine entities immanent in material objects. We call these structures god houses and briefly review examples from numerous societies across the ancient/extramodern worlds and indigenous U.S. Southwest. We then apply this understanding to argue that the architectural logic and material assemblages of Chacoan Great Houses, and especially Pueblo Bonito, suggest identification as god houses, a notion that rephrases the usual distinction between ‘domestic’ and ‘ritual’ interpretations of Great Houses to consider the nature of the beings that dwelled within them. Our argument enriches investigations of the Chaco world by highlighting the role of religion and relations with non-human beings in the development of monumental architecture, regional organization, and inequality in the precontact U.S. Southwest.","PeriodicalId":43900,"journal":{"name":"Time & Mind-The Journal of Archaeology Consciousness and Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Time & Mind-The Journal of Archaeology Consciousness and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1751696X.2021.1918390","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper offers a new interpretation of Chacoan Great Houses, multistoried masonry structures of the 9th-12th century U.S. Southwest, using insights from animist ontologies, cognitive science, cross-cultural analysis, and ethnohistory. Throughout time and space, societies have constructed buildings to serve as dwelling places for animate, divine entities immanent in material objects. We call these structures god houses and briefly review examples from numerous societies across the ancient/extramodern worlds and indigenous U.S. Southwest. We then apply this understanding to argue that the architectural logic and material assemblages of Chacoan Great Houses, and especially Pueblo Bonito, suggest identification as god houses, a notion that rephrases the usual distinction between ‘domestic’ and ‘ritual’ interpretations of Great Houses to consider the nature of the beings that dwelled within them. Our argument enriches investigations of the Chaco world by highlighting the role of religion and relations with non-human beings in the development of monumental architecture, regional organization, and inequality in the precontact U.S. Southwest.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为谁准备的大房子?:跨文化、认知和民族历史视角下的查科纪念性建筑
本文运用万物有灵论本体论、认知科学、跨文化分析和民族历史的见解,对美国西南部9 -12世纪的多层砖石结构——查科人大房子(Chacoan Great Houses)进行了新的解读。在整个时间和空间中,社会已经建造了建筑物,作为内在物质物体中有生命的、神圣的实体的住所。我们称这些结构为上帝的房子,并简要回顾了古代/现代世界和美国西南部原住民的许多社会的例子。然后,我们运用这一理解来论证查科恩大宅的建筑逻辑和材料组合,特别是普韦布洛博尼托,表明了作为神宅的身份,这一概念重新表述了大宅的“家庭”和“仪式”解释之间的通常区别,以考虑居住在其中的生物的本质。我们的论点通过强调宗教的作用以及与非人类在纪念性建筑、区域组织和未接触美国西南部的不平等发展中的关系,丰富了对查科世界的调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
The Rough Tor Effect: early prehistoric monuments focusing on significant tors in Cornwall Apolline divination: hallucinogenic substances or cognitive inputs? The case of the laurel Performance theory: a growing interest in rock art research Archaeology at the intersection between cognitive neuroscience, performance theory, and architecture: from psychoactive substances to rock art and bone shelters Living inside a mammoth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1