Understanding and Reviewing RDA Vocabularies in RDF: A Multi-Layer Framework Approach

Q2 Social Sciences Journal of Library Metadata Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI:10.1080/19386389.2021.1941717
Shoichi Taniguchi
{"title":"Understanding and Reviewing RDA Vocabularies in RDF: A Multi-Layer Framework Approach","authors":"Shoichi Taniguchi","doi":"10.1080/19386389.2021.1941717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper proposes a framework to understand and review the present and possible RDA Vocabularies in RDF after the 3 R Project, and also examines RDA Vocabularies under this framework to confirm the validity and usefulness of the framework. Further, it proposes an alternate for the vocabularies at each layer of the framework. (1) The proposed framework consists of four layers: (a) layer 1 constructs RDA Vocabularies in line with the RDA conceptual model; (b) layer 2 constructs vocabularies in RDF representation that accommodate the recording methods prescribed in RDA for individual elements; (c) layer 3 constructs them by reconstructing the relationship elements; and (d) layer 4 accommodates additional ways to enforce the structural representation of RDA metadata. RDA Vocabularies are examined at each layer to demonstrate the framework’s validity and usefulness. (2) Alternate vocabularies in RDF are proposed at layers 2 and 3 of the framework. Those proposed vocabularies could be useful, but the examination of their usefulness is limited. Extensions at layer 4 would also be useful for the schema for RDA metadata creation. Therefore, the proposed framework is valuable for understanding and reviewing RDA Vocabularies, while some points need further consideration.","PeriodicalId":39057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Library Metadata","volume":"27 1","pages":"237 - 260"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Library Metadata","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2021.1941717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This paper proposes a framework to understand and review the present and possible RDA Vocabularies in RDF after the 3 R Project, and also examines RDA Vocabularies under this framework to confirm the validity and usefulness of the framework. Further, it proposes an alternate for the vocabularies at each layer of the framework. (1) The proposed framework consists of four layers: (a) layer 1 constructs RDA Vocabularies in line with the RDA conceptual model; (b) layer 2 constructs vocabularies in RDF representation that accommodate the recording methods prescribed in RDA for individual elements; (c) layer 3 constructs them by reconstructing the relationship elements; and (d) layer 4 accommodates additional ways to enforce the structural representation of RDA metadata. RDA Vocabularies are examined at each layer to demonstrate the framework’s validity and usefulness. (2) Alternate vocabularies in RDF are proposed at layers 2 and 3 of the framework. Those proposed vocabularies could be useful, but the examination of their usefulness is limited. Extensions at layer 4 would also be useful for the schema for RDA metadata creation. Therefore, the proposed framework is valuable for understanding and reviewing RDA Vocabularies, while some points need further consideration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理解和回顾RDF中的RDA词汇:一种多层框架方法
摘要:本文提出了一个框架来理解和回顾3r项目后RDF中现有的和可能的RDA词汇表,并在此框架下对RDA词汇表进行检验,以确认该框架的有效性和有用性。此外,它还为框架的每一层的词汇表提出了一种替代方案。(1)该框架由四层组成:(a)第一层根据RDA概念模型构建RDA词汇表;(b)第2层以RDF表示构建词汇表,以适应RDA中对单个元素规定的记录方法;(c)第三层通过重构关系元素来构造它们;(d)第4层容纳额外的方法来强制RDA元数据的结构化表示。在每一层检查RDA词汇表,以演示框架的有效性和有用性。(2)在框架的第2层和第3层提出了RDF中的备选词汇表。这些建议的词汇表可能是有用的,但对其有用性的研究是有限的。第4层的扩展对于RDA元数据创建的模式也很有用。因此,所提出的框架对于理解和回顾RDA词汇表是有价值的,但有些地方需要进一步考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Library Metadata
Journal of Library Metadata Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Metadata Management in Data Lake Environments: A Survey A Minimal Metadata Schema and Its Tool to Improve the Searchableness of Research Data in Bioinformatics Changes in Digital Collections and Their Metadata: A Longitudinal Study of UIUC Digital Library Common Metadata Framework for Research Data Repository: Necessity to Support Open Science Entity Management Using RDA and Wikibase: A Case Study at the National Library of Greece
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1