"Investigating Reliable Recovery Biomarkers of Ischemic Stroke: An Evidence-Based Study"

P. Tiwari
{"title":"\"Investigating Reliable Recovery Biomarkers of Ischemic Stroke: An Evidence-Based Study\"","authors":"P. Tiwari","doi":"10.26717/bjstr.2021.40.006388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2020, WHO reported that stroke is the second leading cause of death worldwide. Stroke recovery is the complex process due to its heterogeneous nature. Identification of reliable recovery biomarkers assist to advance the practice, rehabilitation and recovery after stroke. Objective: This systematic review aimed to assess the biomarkers and predictors of recovery in ischemic stroke. Methods: Case-control studies reporting the biomarkers and predictors of recovery in ischemic stroke patients were identified through PubMed, Wiley online library, Rehab data and PEDro databases. Studies in English language published after the year 2000 were included. Studies on animal models and patients with other psychiatric or neurological condition (other than stroke) were excluded. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of studies. Relative levels of recovery biomarkers in post-ischemic stroke patients were compared with the levels found in control subjects. Random effect model was used to calculate the mean effect size of studies. This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020209833). The results of this systematic review are based on 29 studies that covered 2528 participants (case:926 patients, control:1602 participants). A total of 22 markers were reported in this review. The core biomarkers differentiated ischemic stroke’s recovery from controls with good performance: Motor evoked potential [standardized mean difference -2.14, P=0.03], laterality index [standardized mean difference -1.32, P=0.03] and stimulus intensity [standardized mean difference 1.63, P=0.18]. Conclusion: The motor evoked potential, laterality index and stimulus intensity were found as relevant biomarkers that predict motor recovery in ischemic stroke patients.","PeriodicalId":9035,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26717/bjstr.2021.40.006388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2020, WHO reported that stroke is the second leading cause of death worldwide. Stroke recovery is the complex process due to its heterogeneous nature. Identification of reliable recovery biomarkers assist to advance the practice, rehabilitation and recovery after stroke. Objective: This systematic review aimed to assess the biomarkers and predictors of recovery in ischemic stroke. Methods: Case-control studies reporting the biomarkers and predictors of recovery in ischemic stroke patients were identified through PubMed, Wiley online library, Rehab data and PEDro databases. Studies in English language published after the year 2000 were included. Studies on animal models and patients with other psychiatric or neurological condition (other than stroke) were excluded. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of studies. Relative levels of recovery biomarkers in post-ischemic stroke patients were compared with the levels found in control subjects. Random effect model was used to calculate the mean effect size of studies. This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020209833). The results of this systematic review are based on 29 studies that covered 2528 participants (case:926 patients, control:1602 participants). A total of 22 markers were reported in this review. The core biomarkers differentiated ischemic stroke’s recovery from controls with good performance: Motor evoked potential [standardized mean difference -2.14, P=0.03], laterality index [standardized mean difference -1.32, P=0.03] and stimulus intensity [standardized mean difference 1.63, P=0.18]. Conclusion: The motor evoked potential, laterality index and stimulus intensity were found as relevant biomarkers that predict motor recovery in ischemic stroke patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
缺血性卒中可靠恢复生物标志物的研究:一项基于证据的研究
2020年,世卫组织报告说,中风是全世界第二大死亡原因。由于中风的异质性,中风恢复是一个复杂的过程。确定可靠的恢复生物标志物有助于推进卒中后的实践、康复和恢复。目的:本系统综述旨在评估缺血性脑卒中恢复的生物标志物和预测因素。方法:通过PubMed、Wiley在线图书馆、Rehab data和PEDro数据库对报告缺血性脑卒中患者康复的生物标志物和预测因素的病例对照研究进行鉴定。2000年以后发表的英文研究也包括在内。排除了动物模型和其他精神或神经疾病(中风除外)患者的研究。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)评估研究质量。将缺血性脑卒中后患者恢复生物标志物的相对水平与对照组进行比较。采用随机效应模型计算各研究的平均效应量。本系统评价已在PROSPERO注册(CRD42020209833)。本系统综述的结果基于29项研究,涵盖2528名参与者(病例:926名患者,对照组:1602名参与者)。本综述共报道了22个标志物。将缺血性卒中恢复与表现良好的对照组区分的核心生物指标为:运动诱发电位[标准化平均差-2.14,P=0.03]、侧性指数[标准化平均差-1.32,P=0.03]和刺激强度[标准化平均差1.63,P=0.18]。结论:运动诱发电位、偏侧指数和刺激强度是预测缺血性脑卒中患者运动恢复的相关生物指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Immunomodulatory Strategies for Spinal Cord Injury. A Case of Thoracic Disc Herniation Effectively Treated with Interventional Radiology Computed Tomography- Guided Percutaneous Endoscopic Radiofrequency Annuloplasty Using a Disc-Fx® COVID-19 and Human Immune System Responses Stress Prevalence in College Students During COVID-19 Pandemics: Evidence from Economics Undergraduates in a Developing Country Pore Characterization of Alumina Short Fiber Using Small Angle X-Ray Scattering Technique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1