Land claims in South Africa: Uniqueness, historical distortions and injustices on the copper miners of Musina

IF 0.1 Q3 HISTORY New Contree Pub Date : 2020-12-30 DOI:10.4102/nc.v85i0.33
M. Sebola
{"title":"Land claims in South Africa: Uniqueness, historical distortions and injustices on the copper miners of Musina","authors":"M. Sebola","doi":"10.4102/nc.v85i0.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article argues that the case of the land claim by the descendants of the Copper Miners of Musina (the Musina clan) presents a unique case of historical distortions and injustice of land and mineral resources ownership by a South African black community. Land claims in South Africa have become widespread since the advent of the country’s democracy. With the land reform programmes in South Africa, some communities have been able to lay their hands on lost land that was forcefully taken from the locals under apartheid. The achievement with regards to reparation in South Africa has seen some claims being successfully processed. However, there are some beneficiaries who undeservedly possess land through undetected fraudulent claims. When such exists; deserving claimants like the Musina clan remain landless because of historical distortions and failure by the current regime to restore justice. This article is conceptual and it uses literature analysis approach to argue that archeologists and ethnologists deliberately ignored the historical studies on the copper miners of Musina in order to hide the truth about the discovery of copper mining in Messina. There are writings making incorrect assumptions regarding how Lieutenant Colonel Pascoe Grenfell, James Harper and James Campbell in 1903 discovered coal in mines deserted by the natives in order to ascribe the discovery to the white community in Messina. The author argues that there were no disserted mines in Messina when Lieutenant Colonel Grenfell arrived in Messina in 1903, instead what he did was to register the company and obtain a discoverers certificate, introduce new technology of mining and expropriate the mine from the Musina clan without compensation. It is suggested that new avenues regarding such history be fully researched towards gaining a more comprehensive view of the role and impact of the Musina clan.","PeriodicalId":52000,"journal":{"name":"New Contree","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Contree","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/nc.v85i0.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article argues that the case of the land claim by the descendants of the Copper Miners of Musina (the Musina clan) presents a unique case of historical distortions and injustice of land and mineral resources ownership by a South African black community. Land claims in South Africa have become widespread since the advent of the country’s democracy. With the land reform programmes in South Africa, some communities have been able to lay their hands on lost land that was forcefully taken from the locals under apartheid. The achievement with regards to reparation in South Africa has seen some claims being successfully processed. However, there are some beneficiaries who undeservedly possess land through undetected fraudulent claims. When such exists; deserving claimants like the Musina clan remain landless because of historical distortions and failure by the current regime to restore justice. This article is conceptual and it uses literature analysis approach to argue that archeologists and ethnologists deliberately ignored the historical studies on the copper miners of Musina in order to hide the truth about the discovery of copper mining in Messina. There are writings making incorrect assumptions regarding how Lieutenant Colonel Pascoe Grenfell, James Harper and James Campbell in 1903 discovered coal in mines deserted by the natives in order to ascribe the discovery to the white community in Messina. The author argues that there were no disserted mines in Messina when Lieutenant Colonel Grenfell arrived in Messina in 1903, instead what he did was to register the company and obtain a discoverers certificate, introduce new technology of mining and expropriate the mine from the Musina clan without compensation. It is suggested that new avenues regarding such history be fully researched towards gaining a more comprehensive view of the role and impact of the Musina clan.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非的土地主张:穆西纳铜矿矿工的独特性、历史扭曲和不公正
本文认为,穆西纳铜矿矿工后裔(穆西纳族)的土地要求案是南非黑人社区对土地和矿产资源所有权的历史扭曲和不公正的独特案例。自从南非实行民主制度以来,土地所有权的要求已经变得非常普遍。随着南非的土地改革方案,一些社区已经能够掌握在种族隔离时期从当地人手中强行夺取的失去的土地。南非在赔偿方面取得的成就使一些索赔要求得到了成功的处理。然而,有一些受益人通过未被发现的欺诈索赔而不正当地拥有土地。当这种存在时;像Musina氏族这样应得的索赔人仍然没有土地,因为历史扭曲和现任政权未能恢复正义。这篇文章是概念性的,它使用文献分析法来论证考古学家和民族学家故意忽视墨西拿铜矿工人的历史研究,以掩盖墨西拿铜矿发现的真相。有些著作对帕斯科·格伦费尔中校、詹姆斯·哈珀和詹姆斯·坎贝尔是如何在1903年在被当地人遗弃的矿井中发现煤炭做出了错误的假设,以便将这一发现归咎于墨西拿的白人社区。作者认为,当Grenfell中校于1903年到达墨西拿时,墨西拿并没有被开采的矿山,相反,他所做的是注册公司并获得发现者证书,引进新的采矿技术并从Musina氏族那里无偿征用矿山。建议充分研究有关这段历史的新途径,以便更全面地了解Musina氏族的作用和影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
New Contree
New Contree HISTORY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The role of CASSAS in the liberation struggle of the southern African region, 1976 to the early 1980s The waning fortunes of traditional leadership in South Africa: From pre-colonial to apartheid periods The place of the Bulhoek massacre in South African history From the Editor-in-Chief’s Desk From the Editor-in-Chief’s Desk
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1