The Effect of Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy-guided Technique for Placement of a Left-sided Double-lumen Tube on the Intubation Performance Compared with the Conventional Method Using a Macintosh Laryngoscope
{"title":"The Effect of Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy-guided Technique for Placement of a Left-sided Double-lumen Tube on the Intubation Performance Compared with the Conventional Method Using a Macintosh Laryngoscope","authors":"Jung-A. Lim, In-Young Kim, S. Byun","doi":"10.2174/2589645802014010115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n The accurate placement of the double-lumen endotracheal tube is imperative for effective one-lung ventilation in thoracic surgery. Malpositioning and repositioning of a misplaced tube may cause excessive trauma.\n \n \n \n We hypothesized that the fiberoptic bronchoscope-guided method for double-lumen endotracheal tube placement would reduce the incidence of malpositioning as compared to the conventional method using the Macintosh laryngoscope.\n \n \n \n Fifty patients scheduled to undergo elective thoracic surgery were recruited and randomly assigned to the fiberoptic bronchoscope-guided [n=25; Group F] and conventional [n=25; Group C] method groups, according to the method of double-lumen endotracheal tube placement. The primary outcome was the incidence of double-lumen endotracheal tube malpositioning observed under the fiberoptic bronchoscope after initial placement. Secondary outcomes included the times for placement, confirmation, and total procedure of double-lumen endotracheal tube intubation.\n \n \n \n The incidence of malpositioning after initial double-lumen endotracheal tube placement was significantly lower in Group F than in Group C (20.0% vs 68.0%). In addition, the time for placement was significantly higher in Group F than in Group C, and that for confirmation was significantly lower in Group F than in Group C.\n \n \n \n The fiberoptic bronchoscope-guided method for double-lumen endotracheal tube placement can reduce the incidence of malpositioning after initial placement and expedite the intubation process with a double-lumen endotracheal tube in thoracic surgery.\n","PeriodicalId":22862,"journal":{"name":"The Open Anesthesia Journal","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Anesthesia Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2589645802014010115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The accurate placement of the double-lumen endotracheal tube is imperative for effective one-lung ventilation in thoracic surgery. Malpositioning and repositioning of a misplaced tube may cause excessive trauma.
We hypothesized that the fiberoptic bronchoscope-guided method for double-lumen endotracheal tube placement would reduce the incidence of malpositioning as compared to the conventional method using the Macintosh laryngoscope.
Fifty patients scheduled to undergo elective thoracic surgery were recruited and randomly assigned to the fiberoptic bronchoscope-guided [n=25; Group F] and conventional [n=25; Group C] method groups, according to the method of double-lumen endotracheal tube placement. The primary outcome was the incidence of double-lumen endotracheal tube malpositioning observed under the fiberoptic bronchoscope after initial placement. Secondary outcomes included the times for placement, confirmation, and total procedure of double-lumen endotracheal tube intubation.
The incidence of malpositioning after initial double-lumen endotracheal tube placement was significantly lower in Group F than in Group C (20.0% vs 68.0%). In addition, the time for placement was significantly higher in Group F than in Group C, and that for confirmation was significantly lower in Group F than in Group C.
The fiberoptic bronchoscope-guided method for double-lumen endotracheal tube placement can reduce the incidence of malpositioning after initial placement and expedite the intubation process with a double-lumen endotracheal tube in thoracic surgery.
在胸外科手术中,双腔气管插管的准确放置是有效的单肺通气的必要条件。放错位置的管子的错位和重新定位可能会造成过度的创伤。我们假设在纤维支气管镜引导下放置双腔气管内管的方法与使用Macintosh喉镜的传统方法相比,可以减少定位错误的发生率。50例计划接受择期胸外科手术的患者被随机分配到纤维支气管镜引导下[n=25;F组和常规组[n=25;C组]方法组,按双腔法置管。主要观察结果为初次置入后纤维支气管镜下观察到的双腔气管内管错位发生率。次要结果包括放置次数、确认次数和双腔气管插管总过程。初始双腔气管内置管后,F组的位错发生率明显低于C组(20.0% vs 68.0%)。此外,F组置入时间明显高于C组,F组确认时间明显低于C组。纤维支气管镜引导下双腔气管插管方法可减少初次置入后的错位发生率,加快胸外科双腔气管插管过程。