Towards Automating Precision Irrigation: Deep Learning to Infer Local Soil Moisture Conditions from Synthetic Aerial Agricultural Images

David Tseng, David Wang, Carolyn L. Chen, Lauren Miller, W. Song, J. Viers, S. Vougioukas, Stefano Carpin, J. A. Ojea, Ken Goldberg
{"title":"Towards Automating Precision Irrigation: Deep Learning to Infer Local Soil Moisture Conditions from Synthetic Aerial Agricultural Images","authors":"David Tseng, David Wang, Carolyn L. Chen, Lauren Miller, W. Song, J. Viers, S. Vougioukas, Stefano Carpin, J. A. Ojea, Ken Goldberg","doi":"10.1109/COASE.2018.8560431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent advances in unmanned aerial vehicles suggest that collecting aerial agricultural images can be cost-efficient, which can subsequently support automated precision irrigation. To study the potential for machine learning to learn local soil moisture conditions directly from such images, we developed a very fast, linear discrete-time simulation of plant growth based on the Richards equation. We use the simulator to generate large datasets of synthetic aerial images of a vineyard with known moisture conditions and then compare seven methods for inferring moisture conditions from images, in which the “uncorrelated plant” methods look at individual plants and the “correlated field” methods look at the entire vineyard: 1) constant prediction baseline, 2) linear Support Vector Machines (SVM), 3) Random Forests Uncorrelated Plant (RFUP), 4) Random Forests Correlated Field (RFCF), 5) two-layer Neural Networks (NN), 6) Deep Convolutional Neural Networks Uncorrelated Plant (CNNUP), and 7) Deep Convolutional Neural Networks Correlated Field (CNNCF). Experiments on held-out test images show that a globally-connected CNN performs best with normalized mean absolute error of 3.4%. Sensitivity experiments suggest that learned global CNNs are robust to injected noise in both the simulator and generated images as well as in the size of the training sets. In simulation, we compare the agricultural standard of flood irrigation to a proportional precision irrigation controller using the output of the global CNN and find that the latter can reduce water consumption by up to 52% and is also robust to errors in irrigation level, location, and timing. The first-order plant simulator and datasets are available at https://github.com/BerkeleyAutomation/RAPID.","PeriodicalId":6518,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE 14th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE)","volume":"58 1","pages":"284-291"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE 14th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COASE.2018.8560431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

Recent advances in unmanned aerial vehicles suggest that collecting aerial agricultural images can be cost-efficient, which can subsequently support automated precision irrigation. To study the potential for machine learning to learn local soil moisture conditions directly from such images, we developed a very fast, linear discrete-time simulation of plant growth based on the Richards equation. We use the simulator to generate large datasets of synthetic aerial images of a vineyard with known moisture conditions and then compare seven methods for inferring moisture conditions from images, in which the “uncorrelated plant” methods look at individual plants and the “correlated field” methods look at the entire vineyard: 1) constant prediction baseline, 2) linear Support Vector Machines (SVM), 3) Random Forests Uncorrelated Plant (RFUP), 4) Random Forests Correlated Field (RFCF), 5) two-layer Neural Networks (NN), 6) Deep Convolutional Neural Networks Uncorrelated Plant (CNNUP), and 7) Deep Convolutional Neural Networks Correlated Field (CNNCF). Experiments on held-out test images show that a globally-connected CNN performs best with normalized mean absolute error of 3.4%. Sensitivity experiments suggest that learned global CNNs are robust to injected noise in both the simulator and generated images as well as in the size of the training sets. In simulation, we compare the agricultural standard of flood irrigation to a proportional precision irrigation controller using the output of the global CNN and find that the latter can reduce water consumption by up to 52% and is also robust to errors in irrigation level, location, and timing. The first-order plant simulator and datasets are available at https://github.com/BerkeleyAutomation/RAPID.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
迈向自动化精确灌溉:从合成航空农业图像中推断当地土壤湿度状况的深度学习
无人机的最新进展表明,收集空中农业图像具有成本效益,随后可以支持自动精确灌溉。为了研究机器学习直接从这些图像中学习当地土壤湿度条件的潜力,我们基于Richards方程开发了一个非常快速的线性离散时间植物生长模拟。我们使用模拟器生成已知湿度条件下葡萄园的合成航空图像的大型数据集,然后比较从图像推断湿度条件的七种方法,其中“不相关植物”方法查看单个植物,而“相关田地”方法查看整个葡萄园。1)恒定预测基线,2)线性支持向量机(SVM), 3)随机森林不相关植物(RFUP), 4)随机森林相关场(RFCF), 5)两层神经网络(NN), 6)深度卷积神经网络不相关植物(CNNUP), 7)深度卷积神经网络相关场(CNNCF)。在hold out测试图像上的实验表明,全局连接的CNN表现最好,归一化平均绝对误差为3.4%。灵敏度实验表明,学习全局cnn对模拟器和生成图像的注入噪声以及训练集的大小都具有鲁棒性。在模拟中,我们使用全局CNN的输出将农业标准的洪水灌溉与比例精确灌溉控制器进行比较,发现后者可以减少高达52%的用水量,并且对灌溉水平,位置和时间的错误也具有鲁棒性。一级工厂模拟器和数据集可在https://github.com/BerkeleyAutomation/RAPID上获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Automated Electric-Field-Based Nanowire Characterization, Manipulation, and Assembly Dynamic Sampling for Feasibility Determination Gripping Positions Selection for Unfolding a Rectangular Cloth Product Multi-Robot Routing Algorithms for Robots Operating in Vineyards Enhancing Data-Driven Models with Knowledge from Engineering Models in Manufacturing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1