Verification Condition Generation for Permission Logics with Abstraction Functions

Stefan Heule, Ioannis T. Kassios, Peter Müller, Alexander J. Summers
{"title":"Verification Condition Generation for Permission Logics with Abstraction Functions","authors":"Stefan Heule, Ioannis T. Kassios, Peter Müller, Alexander J. Summers","doi":"10.3929/ETHZ-A-007313727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract predicates are the primary abstraction mechanism for program logics based on access permissions, such as separation logic and implicit dynamic frames. In addition to abstract predicates, it is often useful to also support classical abstraction functions, for instance, to encode side-effect free methods of the program and use them in specifications. However, combining abstract predicates and abstraction functions in a verification condition generator leads to subtle interactions, which complicate reasoning about heap modifications. Such complications may compromise soundness or cause divergence of the prover in the context of automated verification. In this paper, we present an encoding of abstract predicates and abstraction functions in the verification condition generator Boogie. Our encoding is sound and handles recursion in a way that is suitable for automatic verification using SMT solvers. It is implemented in the automatic verifier Chalice.","PeriodicalId":10841,"journal":{"name":"CTIT technical reports series","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CTIT technical reports series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3929/ETHZ-A-007313727","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract predicates are the primary abstraction mechanism for program logics based on access permissions, such as separation logic and implicit dynamic frames. In addition to abstract predicates, it is often useful to also support classical abstraction functions, for instance, to encode side-effect free methods of the program and use them in specifications. However, combining abstract predicates and abstraction functions in a verification condition generator leads to subtle interactions, which complicate reasoning about heap modifications. Such complications may compromise soundness or cause divergence of the prover in the context of automated verification. In this paper, we present an encoding of abstract predicates and abstraction functions in the verification condition generator Boogie. Our encoding is sound and handles recursion in a way that is suitable for automatic verification using SMT solvers. It is implemented in the automatic verifier Chalice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
具有抽象功能的权限逻辑验证条件生成
抽象谓词是基于访问权限的分离逻辑和隐式动态框架等程序逻辑的主要抽象机制。除了抽象谓词之外,支持经典抽象函数通常也很有用,例如,对程序的无副作用方法进行编码并在规范中使用它们。然而,在验证条件生成器中组合抽象谓词和抽象函数会导致微妙的交互,这会使堆修改的推理复杂化。在自动验证的背景下,这种复杂性可能会损害可靠性或导致证明者的分歧。本文给出了验证条件生成器Boogie中抽象谓词和抽象函数的编码方法。我们的编码是合理的,并且以一种适合使用SMT求解器进行自动验证的方式处理递归。它在自动验证器Chalice中实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Costs and Benefits of Electric Vehicles and District Cooling Systems: A case study in Singapore Towards a Digital Urban Climate Twin: Simulation-as-a-Service (SaaS) for Model Integration Microscale Assessment of the Anthropogenic Heat Mitigation Strategies Decision Support System: User research, usability analysis and computational build Analysis of climatic variables in different urban sites of Singapore and evaluation of strategies to improve the outdoor thermal environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1