Stop and Go: Barriers and Facilitators to Care Home Research.

Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.14283/jfa.2022.51
L A Ritchie, A L Gordon, P E Penson, D A Lane, A Akpan
{"title":"Stop and Go: Barriers and Facilitators to Care Home Research.","authors":"L A Ritchie,&nbsp;A L Gordon,&nbsp;P E Penson,&nbsp;D A Lane,&nbsp;A Akpan","doi":"10.14283/jfa.2022.51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Barriers to care home research have always existed, but have been thrown into sharp relief by the COVID-19 pandemic. Existing infrastructure failed to deliver the research, or outcomes, which care home residents deserved and we need to look, again, at how these barriers can be taken down. Barriers can be categorised as procedural (encountered before research starts), system (encountered during research) or resident-specific. To tackle these, research regulatory bodies need to adopt a standardised approach to how care home research is developed and designed, reviewed and regulated, and how such approaches can enable recruitment of as wide a range of residents and their representatives as possible, including those without the mental capacity to consent for research. Establishment of local, inter-disciplinary collaborations between universities, general practices, health and social care providers and care homes is another priority. This should be based on pre-existing models such as the 'Living lab' model developed in The Netherlands and now being implemented in the UK and Austria. These changes are critical to develop a sustainable research model. If well designed this will deliver better outcomes for residents and align with the individual and organisational priorities of those who care for them.</p>","PeriodicalId":75074,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"12 1","pages":"63-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9523644/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2022.51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Barriers to care home research have always existed, but have been thrown into sharp relief by the COVID-19 pandemic. Existing infrastructure failed to deliver the research, or outcomes, which care home residents deserved and we need to look, again, at how these barriers can be taken down. Barriers can be categorised as procedural (encountered before research starts), system (encountered during research) or resident-specific. To tackle these, research regulatory bodies need to adopt a standardised approach to how care home research is developed and designed, reviewed and regulated, and how such approaches can enable recruitment of as wide a range of residents and their representatives as possible, including those without the mental capacity to consent for research. Establishment of local, inter-disciplinary collaborations between universities, general practices, health and social care providers and care homes is another priority. This should be based on pre-existing models such as the 'Living lab' model developed in The Netherlands and now being implemented in the UK and Austria. These changes are critical to develop a sustainable research model. If well designed this will deliver better outcomes for residents and align with the individual and organisational priorities of those who care for them.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
走走停停:养老院研究的障碍和促进因素。
养老院研究的障碍一直存在,但COVID-19大流行使这些障碍变得更加明显。现有的基础设施未能提供养老院居民应得的研究或成果,我们需要再次审视如何消除这些障碍。障碍可以分为程序性(在研究开始前遇到)、制度性(在研究过程中遇到)或居民特异性。为了解决这些问题,研究监管机构需要采用一种标准化的方法来制定、设计、审查和监管养老院的研究,以及如何采用这种方法来招募尽可能多的住院医生及其代表,包括那些没有精神能力同意进行研究的人。另一项优先事项是在大学、普通诊所、保健和社会护理提供者以及养老院之间建立地方的跨学科合作。这应该基于已有的模式,如荷兰开发的“生活实验室”模式,目前正在英国和奥地利实施。这些变化对于发展可持续的研究模式至关重要。如果设计得当,这将为居民带来更好的结果,并与照顾他们的个人和组织的优先事项保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1