Learning conditional relations in elderly people with and without neurocognitive disorders.

Q3 Psychology Psychology and Neuroscience Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI:10.1037/PNE0000049
Mariana Ducatti, A. Schmidt
{"title":"Learning conditional relations in elderly people with and without neurocognitive disorders.","authors":"Mariana Ducatti, A. Schmidt","doi":"10.1037/PNE0000049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Elderly people with neurocognitive disorders (NCDs) present difficulties in learning and maintaining arbitrary conditional relations between stimuli. The aims of Study 1 were to (a) verify the efficacy of a procedure of teaching conditional relations by exclusion in elderly people with and without NCDs and (b) determine the presence or absence of the formation of equivalence classes based on this procedure. Five elderly people without NCDs (control group [CG]) and 6 elderly women with NCDs (experimental group [EG]) underwent a teaching-by-exclusion procedure (linear structure) with 4 classes of stimuli with 5 stimuli each (dictated names of people, photographs, written names, degrees of relatedness, and profession). The formation of equivalence classes was then tested. All of the participants in the CG learned the conditional relations, and 3 of the 5 formed equivalence classes. However, none of the participants in the EG learned the AB relations, despite demonstrating performance by exclusion. The aim of Study 2 was to determine the efficacy of a procedure that combined teaching by exclusion and the delayed-cue procedure to teach arbitrary relations to elderly people with NCDs. Four elderly women with NCDs underwent a teaching procedure (one-to-many structure) with 3 classes with 3 visual stimuli each (photographs, written names, and names of professions). All of the participants learned the conditional relations, and 2 named some of the photographs that were presented. The procedure effectively taught arbitrary relations and may be promising for studying intervention procedures in elderly people with NCDs.","PeriodicalId":39094,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and Neuroscience","volume":"92 1","pages":"240-254"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology and Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/PNE0000049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Elderly people with neurocognitive disorders (NCDs) present difficulties in learning and maintaining arbitrary conditional relations between stimuli. The aims of Study 1 were to (a) verify the efficacy of a procedure of teaching conditional relations by exclusion in elderly people with and without NCDs and (b) determine the presence or absence of the formation of equivalence classes based on this procedure. Five elderly people without NCDs (control group [CG]) and 6 elderly women with NCDs (experimental group [EG]) underwent a teaching-by-exclusion procedure (linear structure) with 4 classes of stimuli with 5 stimuli each (dictated names of people, photographs, written names, degrees of relatedness, and profession). The formation of equivalence classes was then tested. All of the participants in the CG learned the conditional relations, and 3 of the 5 formed equivalence classes. However, none of the participants in the EG learned the AB relations, despite demonstrating performance by exclusion. The aim of Study 2 was to determine the efficacy of a procedure that combined teaching by exclusion and the delayed-cue procedure to teach arbitrary relations to elderly people with NCDs. Four elderly women with NCDs underwent a teaching procedure (one-to-many structure) with 3 classes with 3 visual stimuli each (photographs, written names, and names of professions). All of the participants learned the conditional relations, and 2 named some of the photographs that were presented. The procedure effectively taught arbitrary relations and may be promising for studying intervention procedures in elderly people with NCDs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有或无神经认知障碍的老年人条件关系的学习。
患有神经认知障碍(NCDs)的老年人在学习和维持刺激之间的任意条件关系方面存在困难。研究1的目的是(a)验证在有和没有非传染性疾病的老年人中通过排除来教授条件关系的程序的有效性,以及(b)确定是否存在基于该程序形成的等效类。5名未患非传染性疾病的老年人(对照组[CG])和6名患有非传染性疾病的老年妇女(实验组[EG])接受了4类刺激(线性结构)的排除教学程序,每类刺激有5个刺激(人的口述姓名、照片、书面姓名、亲切度和职业)。然后对等价类的形成进行了检验。CG的所有参与者都学习了条件关系,5个中有3个形成了等价类。然而,在EG中没有参与者学习AB关系,尽管表现出排除的表现。研究2的目的是确定排除教学和延迟提示教学相结合的程序对非传染性疾病老年人的任意关系的有效性。4名患有非传染性疾病的老年妇女接受了一个教学程序(一对多结构),分为3个班级,每个班级有3个视觉刺激(照片、书面姓名和职业名称)。所有的参与者都学习了条件关系,其中2人说出了展示的一些照片的名字。该程序有效地教授了任意关系,并有望用于研究非传染性疾病老年人的干预程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychology and Neuroscience
Psychology and Neuroscience Psychology-Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Psychology & Neuroscience publishes articles encompassing all intersection areas between psychology and neurosciences. The journal is organized into five thematic sections: Psychophysics and PerceptionBehavior/Systems/CognitionPlasticity and Neural DevelopmentClinical and Experimental NeuropsychologyNeuropsychopharmacology
期刊最新文献
Supplemental Material for Effects of Sex on the Attentional Orientation Bias Toward Emotional Expressions in Children: An Eye-Tracking Study An examination of the Amsterdam Executive Function Inventory (AEFI) in South Africa: A factor analytic study. Neural correlates of cognitive reserve based on EEG signals: A systematic review. Effects of sex on the attentional orientation bias toward emotional expressions in children: An eye-tracking study. Evaluation of gaze-to-object mapping algorithms for use in “real-world” translatable neuropsychological paradigms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1