Comparing flash lidar detector options

P. McManamon, P. Banks, J. Beck, Dale G. Fried, A. Huntington, E. Watson
{"title":"Comparing flash lidar detector options","authors":"P. McManamon, P. Banks, J. Beck, Dale G. Fried, A. Huntington, E. Watson","doi":"10.1117/2.1201707.006466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lidar (light detection and ranging) is a method of surveying based on pulsed laser light that is becoming very common. It is used by the military and by many commercial applications, such as 3D mapping and navigation in autonomous cars and unmanned air vehicles. For these applications, sensitive lidar detectors are essential. But there are different types of lidar detection schemes, with corresponding strengths and weaknesses. Here, we compare three lidar receiver technologies using the total laser energy required to perform a set of imaging tasks (a more detailed description is available elsewhere1). The tasks are combinations of two collection types (3D mapping from near and far), two scene types (foliated and unobscured), and three types of data products (geometry only, geometry plus 3-bit intensity, and geometry plus 6-bit intensity). The receiver technologies are based on indium gallium arsenide (InGaAs) Geiger mode avalanche photodiodes (GMAPDs) (see Figure 1), both InGaAs and mercury cadmium telluride (HgCdTe) linear mode avalanche photodiodes (LMAPDs), and optical time-of-flight (OTOF) lidar using commercial 2D cameras. This last method combines rapid polarization rotation of the image and dual lowbandwidth cameras to generate a 3D image. We chose scenarios to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the various lidars. Table 1 summarizes the energy required for various imaging modalities. For the case of the InGaAs LMAPDs, we actually carried two bandwidth settings, but in the table we list only the bandwidth setting that required lower energy. GMAPD cameras operate with a low probability of return (i.e., reflection) on a single pulse, but require multiple coincident returns from the same range. The GMAPD cameras do well with bare-earth 3D mapping and 3D imaging through trees. In grayscale situations, the GMAPD cameras use somewhat more energy. The advantages of the GMAPDs are the following: they are thermoelectrically (TE) cooled; they are low energy per pulse, high-rep-rate lasers, Figure 1. Schematic illustration of a diffused-junction planar-geometry avalanche diode structure. This is the structure for one of our detector options, the Geiger mode avalanche photodiode (GMAPD). The electric field (E) profiles at right show that the peak field intensity is lower in the peripheral region of the diffused p-n junction than it is in the center of the device. SiNx: Silicon nitride. i-InP: Indium phosphide p-i-n diode. i-InGaAsP: Intrinsic (i.e., this region of the semiconductor wafer is not intentionally doped either por n-type) indium gallium arsenide phosphide.","PeriodicalId":22075,"journal":{"name":"Spie Newsroom","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spie Newsroom","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/2.1201707.006466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lidar (light detection and ranging) is a method of surveying based on pulsed laser light that is becoming very common. It is used by the military and by many commercial applications, such as 3D mapping and navigation in autonomous cars and unmanned air vehicles. For these applications, sensitive lidar detectors are essential. But there are different types of lidar detection schemes, with corresponding strengths and weaknesses. Here, we compare three lidar receiver technologies using the total laser energy required to perform a set of imaging tasks (a more detailed description is available elsewhere1). The tasks are combinations of two collection types (3D mapping from near and far), two scene types (foliated and unobscured), and three types of data products (geometry only, geometry plus 3-bit intensity, and geometry plus 6-bit intensity). The receiver technologies are based on indium gallium arsenide (InGaAs) Geiger mode avalanche photodiodes (GMAPDs) (see Figure 1), both InGaAs and mercury cadmium telluride (HgCdTe) linear mode avalanche photodiodes (LMAPDs), and optical time-of-flight (OTOF) lidar using commercial 2D cameras. This last method combines rapid polarization rotation of the image and dual lowbandwidth cameras to generate a 3D image. We chose scenarios to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the various lidars. Table 1 summarizes the energy required for various imaging modalities. For the case of the InGaAs LMAPDs, we actually carried two bandwidth settings, but in the table we list only the bandwidth setting that required lower energy. GMAPD cameras operate with a low probability of return (i.e., reflection) on a single pulse, but require multiple coincident returns from the same range. The GMAPD cameras do well with bare-earth 3D mapping and 3D imaging through trees. In grayscale situations, the GMAPD cameras use somewhat more energy. The advantages of the GMAPDs are the following: they are thermoelectrically (TE) cooled; they are low energy per pulse, high-rep-rate lasers, Figure 1. Schematic illustration of a diffused-junction planar-geometry avalanche diode structure. This is the structure for one of our detector options, the Geiger mode avalanche photodiode (GMAPD). The electric field (E) profiles at right show that the peak field intensity is lower in the peripheral region of the diffused p-n junction than it is in the center of the device. SiNx: Silicon nitride. i-InP: Indium phosphide p-i-n diode. i-InGaAsP: Intrinsic (i.e., this region of the semiconductor wafer is not intentionally doped either por n-type) indium gallium arsenide phosphide.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较闪光激光雷达探测器选项
激光雷达(光探测和测距)是一种基于脉冲激光的测量方法,正变得非常普遍。它被用于军事和许多商业应用,例如自动驾驶汽车和无人驾驶飞行器的3D地图和导航。对于这些应用,敏感的激光雷达探测器是必不可少的。但是有不同类型的激光雷达探测方案,有相应的优点和缺点。在这里,我们使用执行一组成像任务所需的总激光能量来比较三种激光雷达接收器技术(更详细的描述可在其他地方获得1)。这些任务是两种收集类型(来自近和远的3D映射)、两种场景类型(叶状和无遮蔽)和三种类型的数据产品(仅几何、几何加3位强度和几何加6位强度)的组合。接收器技术基于砷化铟镓(InGaAs)盖格模式雪崩光电二极管(gmapd)(见图1),InGaAs和碲化汞镉(HgCdTe)线性模式雪崩光电二极管(lmapd),以及使用商用2D相机的光学飞行时间(OTOF)激光雷达。最后一种方法结合了图像的快速偏振旋转和双低带宽相机来生成三维图像。我们选择场景来突出各种激光雷达的优缺点。表1总结了各种成像方式所需的能量。对于InGaAs lmapd,我们实际上携带了两种带宽设置,但是在表中我们只列出了需要较低能量的带宽设置。GMAPD相机在单脉冲上的返回(即反射)概率很低,但需要从同一范围内的多个同步返回。GMAPD相机在裸地3D测绘和树木三维成像方面表现出色。在灰度情况下,GMAPD摄像机使用更多的能量。gmapd的优点如下:它们是热电(TE)冷却;它们是低能量每脉冲,高重复率激光器,图1。漫射结平面几何雪崩二极管结构示意图。这是我们的探测器选项之一的结构,盖革模式雪崩光电二极管(GMAPD)。右边的电场(E)分布图显示,扩散p-n结外围区域的峰值场强低于器件中心区域的峰值场强。SiNx:氮化硅。磷化铟二极管。i-InGaAsP:本质(即,半导体晶片的这一区域没有故意掺杂por n型)砷化铟镓磷化物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improving time-dependent deformation measurement HiCIBaS - Up, up, and away Deep Thought: Mapping the World, One Automated Step at a Time Future Vision: A Sneak-peek Into Machine Learning Laser Sharp
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1