PipeCheck: Specifying and Verifying Microarchitectural Enforcement of Memory Consistency Models

Daniel Lustig, Michael Pellauer, M. Martonosi
{"title":"PipeCheck: Specifying and Verifying Microarchitectural Enforcement of Memory Consistency Models","authors":"Daniel Lustig, Michael Pellauer, M. Martonosi","doi":"10.1109/MICRO.2014.38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present PipeCheck, a methodology and automated tool for verifying that a particular micro architecture correctly implements the consistency model required by its architectural specification. PipeCheck adapts the notion of a \"happens before\" graph from architecture-level analysis techniques to the micro architecture space. Each node in the \"micro architecturally happens before\" (μhb) graph represents not only a memory instruction, but also a particular location (e.g., Pipeline stage) within the micro architecture. Architectural specifications such as \"preserved program order\" are then treated as propositions to be verified, rather than simply as assumptions. PipeCheck allows an architect to easily and rigorously test whether a micro architecture is stronger than, equal in strength to, or weaker than its architecturally-specified consistency model. We also specify and analyze the behavior of common micro architectural optimizations such as speculative load reordering which technically violate formal architecture-level definitions. We evaluate PipeCheck using a library of established litmus tests on a set of open-source pipelines. Using PipeCheck, we were able to validate the largest pipeline, the Open SPARC T2, in just minutes. We also identified a bug in the O3 pipeline of the gem5 simulator.","PeriodicalId":6591,"journal":{"name":"2014 47th Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture","volume":"47 1","pages":"635-646"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"62","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 47th Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MICRO.2014.38","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 62

Abstract

We present PipeCheck, a methodology and automated tool for verifying that a particular micro architecture correctly implements the consistency model required by its architectural specification. PipeCheck adapts the notion of a "happens before" graph from architecture-level analysis techniques to the micro architecture space. Each node in the "micro architecturally happens before" (μhb) graph represents not only a memory instruction, but also a particular location (e.g., Pipeline stage) within the micro architecture. Architectural specifications such as "preserved program order" are then treated as propositions to be verified, rather than simply as assumptions. PipeCheck allows an architect to easily and rigorously test whether a micro architecture is stronger than, equal in strength to, or weaker than its architecturally-specified consistency model. We also specify and analyze the behavior of common micro architectural optimizations such as speculative load reordering which technically violate formal architecture-level definitions. We evaluate PipeCheck using a library of established litmus tests on a set of open-source pipelines. Using PipeCheck, we were able to validate the largest pipeline, the Open SPARC T2, in just minutes. We also identified a bug in the O3 pipeline of the gem5 simulator.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PipeCheck:指定和验证内存一致性模型的微架构执行
我们提出了PipeCheck,这是一种方法和自动化工具,用于验证特定的微体系结构是否正确实现了其体系结构规范所要求的一致性模型。PipeCheck将“发生之前”图的概念从架构级分析技术应用到微架构空间。“微架构发生之前”(μhb)图中的每个节点不仅表示一个内存指令,而且表示微架构内的特定位置(例如,流水线阶段)。诸如“保留的程序顺序”之类的体系结构规范随后被视为需要验证的命题,而不是简单地作为假设。PipeCheck允许架构师轻松而严格地测试微架构是否比其架构指定的一致性模型更强、更强、更弱。我们还指定并分析了常见的微体系结构优化的行为,例如在技术上违反正式体系结构级别定义的推测性负载重排序。我们使用在一组开源管道上建立的石蕊测试库来评估PipeCheck。使用PipeCheck,我们能够在几分钟内验证最大的管道Open SPARC T2。我们还在gem5模拟器的O3管道中发现了一个bug。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Specializing Compiler Optimizations through Programmable Composition for Dense Matrix Computations Efficient Memory Virtualization: Reducing Dimensionality of Nested Page Walks SMiTe: Precise QoS Prediction on Real-System SMT Processors to Improve Utilization in Warehouse Scale Computers Equalizer: Dynamic Tuning of GPU Resources for Efficient Execution Harnessing Soft Computations for Low-Budget Fault Tolerance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1