Nonlinear Model Based Coordinated Adaptive Robust Control of Electro-Hydraulic Robotic Manipulators: Methods and Comparative Studies

F. Bu, B. Yao
{"title":"Nonlinear Model Based Coordinated Adaptive Robust Control of Electro-Hydraulic Robotic Manipulators: Methods and Comparative Studies","authors":"F. Bu, B. Yao","doi":"10.1115/imece2001/dsc-24581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Compared to conventional robot manipulators driven by electrical motors, hydraulic robot arms have richer nonlinear dynamics and stronger couplings among various joints (or hydraulic cylinders). This paper focuses on the physical model based coordinated adaptive robust control (ARC) strategies that explicitly take into account the strong coupling among various hydraulic cylinders (or joints). In our recent studies, two such methods were proposed to avoid the need of acceleration feedback in doing ARC backstepping designs. The first method uses an observer to recover the state needed for the ARC backstepping design. The second method utilizes the property that the adjoint matrix and the determinant of the inertial matrix can be linearly parametrized by certain suitably selected parameters and employ certain over-parametrizing techniques. Theoretically, both the resulting ARC controllers guarantee a prescribed output tracking transient performance and final tracking accuracy while achieving asymptotic output tracking in the presence of parametric uncertainties only. This paper focuses on the comparative studies of these two methods under various practical constraints. Extensive simulation results which are based on a three degree-of-freedom (DOF) hydraulic robot arm are presented to illustrate the advantages and drawbacks of each method.","PeriodicalId":90691,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference. ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference. ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2001/dsc-24581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Compared to conventional robot manipulators driven by electrical motors, hydraulic robot arms have richer nonlinear dynamics and stronger couplings among various joints (or hydraulic cylinders). This paper focuses on the physical model based coordinated adaptive robust control (ARC) strategies that explicitly take into account the strong coupling among various hydraulic cylinders (or joints). In our recent studies, two such methods were proposed to avoid the need of acceleration feedback in doing ARC backstepping designs. The first method uses an observer to recover the state needed for the ARC backstepping design. The second method utilizes the property that the adjoint matrix and the determinant of the inertial matrix can be linearly parametrized by certain suitably selected parameters and employ certain over-parametrizing techniques. Theoretically, both the resulting ARC controllers guarantee a prescribed output tracking transient performance and final tracking accuracy while achieving asymptotic output tracking in the presence of parametric uncertainties only. This paper focuses on the comparative studies of these two methods under various practical constraints. Extensive simulation results which are based on a three degree-of-freedom (DOF) hydraulic robot arm are presented to illustrate the advantages and drawbacks of each method.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于非线性模型的电液机器人协调自适应鲁棒控制:方法与比较研究
与传统的电动机驱动的机械臂相比,液压机械臂具有更丰富的非线性动力学和更强的各个关节(或液压缸)之间的耦合。本文重点研究了基于物理模型的协调自适应鲁棒控制策略,该策略明确考虑了液压缸(或关节)之间的强耦合。在我们最近的研究中,提出了两种这样的方法来避免在进行ARC反步设计时需要加速度反馈。第一种方法使用观测器来恢复ARC后退设计所需的状态。第二种方法利用了伴随矩阵和惯性矩阵的行列式可以通过适当选择的参数进行线性参数化,并采用一定的过参数化技术。理论上,所得到的ARC控制器都保证了规定的输出跟踪暂态性能和最终跟踪精度,同时只在参数不确定性存在的情况下实现渐近输出跟踪。本文着重在各种实际约束条件下对这两种方法进行比较研究。以一个三自由度液压机械臂为例,给出了大量的仿真结果,说明了每种方法的优缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
STEERABLE NEEDLE TRAJECTORY FOLLOWING IN THE LUNG: TORSIONAL DEADBAND COMPENSATION AND FULL POSE ESTIMATION WITH 5DOF FEEDBACK FOR NEEDLES PASSING THROUGH FLEXIBLE ENDOSCOPES. A SERIES ELASTIC ACTUATOR DESIGN AND CONTROL IN A LINKAGE BASED HAND EXOSKELETON. OBSERVER-BASED CONTROL OF A DUAL-STAGE PIEZOELECTRIC SCANNER. HUMAN-INSPIRED ALGEBRAIC CURVES FOR WEARABLE ROBOT CONTROL. CONTROLLING PHYSICAL INTERACTIONS: HUMANS DO NOT MINIMIZE MUSCLE EFFORT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1