Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs Among Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, Barrett's Esophagus, and Barrett's Esophagus-Related Neoplasia in the United States.

IF 2.3 Q2 ECONOMICS Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2023-03-03 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.36469/001c.68191
Prateek Sharma, Gary W Falk, Menaka Bhor, A Burak Ozbay, Dominick Latremouille-Viau, Annie Guerin, Sherry Shi, Margaret M Elvekrog, Paul Limburg
{"title":"Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs Among Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, Barrett's Esophagus, and Barrett's Esophagus-Related Neoplasia in the United States.","authors":"Prateek Sharma, Gary W Falk, Menaka Bhor, A Burak Ozbay, Dominick Latremouille-Viau, Annie Guerin, Sherry Shi, Margaret M Elvekrog, Paul Limburg","doi":"10.36469/001c.68191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a risk factor for Barrett's esophagus (BE) and BE-related neoplasia (BERN). <b>Objectives:</b> This study aimed to evaluate healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs associated with GERD, BE, and BERN in the United States. <b>Methods:</b> Adult patients with GERD, nondysplastic BE (NDBE), and BERN (including indefinite for dysplasia [IND], low-grade dysplasia [LGD], high-grade dysplasia [HGD] or esophageal adenocarcinoma [EAC]), were identified from a large US administrative claims database, the IBM Truven Health MarketScan® databases (Q1/2015-Q4/2019). Patients were categorized into the corresponding mutually exclusive EAC-risk/diagnosis cohorts based on the most advanced stage from GERD to EAC using diagnosis codes in medical claims. Disease-related HRU and costs (2020 USD) were calculated for each cohort. <b>Results:</b> Patients were categorized into the following EAC-risk/diagnosis cohorts: 3 310 385 into GERD, 172 481 into NDBE, 11 516 into IND, 4332 into LGD, 1549 into HGD, and 11 676 into EAC. Disease-related annual mean number of inpatient admissions, office visits, and emergency department visits by cohort were 0.09, 1.45, and 0.19 for GERD; 0.08, 1.55, and 0.10 for NDBE; 0.10, 1.92, and 0.13 for IND; 0.09, 2.05, and 0.10 for LGD; 0.12, 2.16, and 0.14 for HGD; and 1.43, 6.27, and 0.87 for EAC. Disease-related annual mean total healthcare costs by cohort were $6955 for GERD, $8755 for NDBE, $9675 for IND, $12 241 for LGD, $24 239 for HGD, and $146 319 for EAC. <b>Discussion:</b> Patients with GERD, BE, and BERN had important HRU and costs, including inpatient admissions and office visits. As patients progressed to more advanced stages, there was substantially higher disease-related resource utilization, with associated costs being 16 times higher in patients with EAC than those with NDBE. <b>Conclusions:</b> Findings suggest the need for early identification of high-risk individuals prior to progression to EAC to potentially improve clinical and economic outcomes in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"10 1","pages":"51-58"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9985944/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36469/001c.68191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a risk factor for Barrett's esophagus (BE) and BE-related neoplasia (BERN). Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs associated with GERD, BE, and BERN in the United States. Methods: Adult patients with GERD, nondysplastic BE (NDBE), and BERN (including indefinite for dysplasia [IND], low-grade dysplasia [LGD], high-grade dysplasia [HGD] or esophageal adenocarcinoma [EAC]), were identified from a large US administrative claims database, the IBM Truven Health MarketScan® databases (Q1/2015-Q4/2019). Patients were categorized into the corresponding mutually exclusive EAC-risk/diagnosis cohorts based on the most advanced stage from GERD to EAC using diagnosis codes in medical claims. Disease-related HRU and costs (2020 USD) were calculated for each cohort. Results: Patients were categorized into the following EAC-risk/diagnosis cohorts: 3 310 385 into GERD, 172 481 into NDBE, 11 516 into IND, 4332 into LGD, 1549 into HGD, and 11 676 into EAC. Disease-related annual mean number of inpatient admissions, office visits, and emergency department visits by cohort were 0.09, 1.45, and 0.19 for GERD; 0.08, 1.55, and 0.10 for NDBE; 0.10, 1.92, and 0.13 for IND; 0.09, 2.05, and 0.10 for LGD; 0.12, 2.16, and 0.14 for HGD; and 1.43, 6.27, and 0.87 for EAC. Disease-related annual mean total healthcare costs by cohort were $6955 for GERD, $8755 for NDBE, $9675 for IND, $12 241 for LGD, $24 239 for HGD, and $146 319 for EAC. Discussion: Patients with GERD, BE, and BERN had important HRU and costs, including inpatient admissions and office visits. As patients progressed to more advanced stages, there was substantially higher disease-related resource utilization, with associated costs being 16 times higher in patients with EAC than those with NDBE. Conclusions: Findings suggest the need for early identification of high-risk individuals prior to progression to EAC to potentially improve clinical and economic outcomes in this population.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国胃食管反流病、巴雷特食管和巴雷特食管相关肿瘤患者的医疗资源利用和成本。
背景:胃食管反流病(GERD)是巴雷特食管(BE)和BE相关肿瘤(BERN)的危险因素。目的:本研究旨在评估美国医疗资源利用率(HRU)和与GERD、BE和BERN相关的成本。方法:从美国大型行政索赔数据库IBM Truven Health MarketScan®数据库(2015年第1季度至2019年第4季度)中确定患有GERD、非变性BE和BERN(包括不确定发育不良[IND]、低度发育不良[LGD]、高度发育不良[HGD]或食管腺癌[EAC])的成年患者。根据GERD至EAC的最晚期,使用医疗索赔中的诊断代码将患者分为相应的相互排斥的EAC风险/诊断队列。计算每个队列的疾病相关HRU和成本(2020美元)。结果:患者被分为以下EAC风险/诊断队列:3 310 385进入GERD,172 481进入NDBE,11 516进入IND,4332进入LGD,1549进入HGD,11 676加入EAC。GERD患者与疾病相关的年平均住院人数、办公室就诊人数和急诊就诊人数分别为0.09、1.45和0.19;NDBE为0.08、1.55和0.10;IND为0.10、1.92和0.13;LGD为0.09、2.05和0.10;HGD分别为0.12、2.16和0.14;EAC分别为1.43、6.27和0.87。按队列划分的与疾病相关的年度平均总医疗费用为:GERD 6955美元,NDBE 8755美元,IND 9675美元,12美元 241 LGD,24美元 HGD 239美元,146美元 319用于EAC。讨论:GERD、BE和BERN患者有重要的HRU和费用,包括住院和办公室就诊。随着患者进展到更晚期,与疾病相关的资源利用率明显更高,EAC患者的相关费用是NDBE患者的16倍。结论:研究结果表明,有必要在进展为EAC之前早期识别高危个体,以潜在地改善该人群的临床和经济结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Glycogen Storage Disease Type Ia: A Retrospective Claims Analysis of Complications, Resource Utilization, and Cost of Care. Exploring Quality of Life in Adults Living With Late-onset Pompe Disease: A Combined Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Patient Perceptions from Australia, France, Italy, and the Netherlands. Cost-Utility Analysis of Add-on Cannabidiol vs Usual Care Alone for the Treatment of Seizures in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome or Dravet Syndrome in the Netherlands. The Effects of Adverse Events and Associated Costs on Value-Based Care for Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Could the Inflation Reduction Act Maximum Fair Price Hurt Patients?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1