Contextualizing the Palestinian Refugee Camps in the Gaza Strip

Q3 Social Sciences Contemporary Arab Affairs Pub Date : 2020-12-10 DOI:10.1525/caa.2020.13.4.3
Shadi Saleh
{"title":"Contextualizing the Palestinian Refugee Camps in the Gaza Strip","authors":"Shadi Saleh","doi":"10.1525/caa.2020.13.4.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Refugee camp spaces are widely analyzed against their host territories. They are constantly associated with isolation and time–space suspension. However, empirical studies show that camps are not simply islands unto themselves. They can have varying levels of interactions with their surroundings. This paper is concerned with contextualizing the Palestinian refugee camps in the Gaza Strip by examining four inseparable dimensions: spatial, socioeconomic, political and time. It unfolds the historical and contemporary interplay between camp and non-camp areas and shows the similarities and distinctions between them. The findings are based on the analysis and fieldwork of Jabalya refugee camp, the largest in the Gaza Strip. Ethnographic research tools are used in addition to text and historical aerial photo analysis. The paper concludes that in a context such as the Gaza Strip in which the majority of the population are refugees, there is a great deal of connectivity between camps and non-camp areas. The camps are far from being described as enclaves, bare lives, or state of exception. The distinctions between them and their surroundings are very subtle. To a large extent, the camps in the Gaza Strip represent a special case of connectivity to a level that has normalized the territory to become a large enclaved refugee space.","PeriodicalId":39004,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Arab Affairs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Arab Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/caa.2020.13.4.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Refugee camp spaces are widely analyzed against their host territories. They are constantly associated with isolation and time–space suspension. However, empirical studies show that camps are not simply islands unto themselves. They can have varying levels of interactions with their surroundings. This paper is concerned with contextualizing the Palestinian refugee camps in the Gaza Strip by examining four inseparable dimensions: spatial, socioeconomic, political and time. It unfolds the historical and contemporary interplay between camp and non-camp areas and shows the similarities and distinctions between them. The findings are based on the analysis and fieldwork of Jabalya refugee camp, the largest in the Gaza Strip. Ethnographic research tools are used in addition to text and historical aerial photo analysis. The paper concludes that in a context such as the Gaza Strip in which the majority of the population are refugees, there is a great deal of connectivity between camps and non-camp areas. The camps are far from being described as enclaves, bare lives, or state of exception. The distinctions between them and their surroundings are very subtle. To a large extent, the camps in the Gaza Strip represent a special case of connectivity to a level that has normalized the territory to become a large enclaved refugee space.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加沙地带巴勒斯坦难民营的背景
难民营的空间被广泛地根据其所在国进行分析。它们总是与孤立和时空悬浮联系在一起。然而,实证研究表明,营地并不是孤立的。它们可以与周围环境进行不同程度的互动。本文通过考察空间、社会经济、政治和时间四个不可分割的维度,关注加沙地带巴勒斯坦难民营的背景。它揭示了营区与非营区在历史和当代的相互作用,并揭示了它们之间的异同。这些发现是基于对加沙地带最大的难民营贾巴利亚难民营的分析和实地调查得出的。除了文本和历史航空照片分析外,还使用了民族志研究工具。该论文的结论是,在加沙地带这样的情况下,大多数人口是难民,难民营和非难民营之间存在大量的连通性。这些难民营远没有被描述为飞地、荒芜的生活或例外状态。它们和周围环境之间的区别非常微妙。在很大程度上,加沙地带的难民营代表了一种特殊的连通性,这种连通性已使该领土正常化,成为一个巨大的被包围的难民空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Arab Affairs
Contemporary Arab Affairs Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Review: Women, Islam, and the Abbasid Identity, by Nadia Maria El Cheikh Review: Environmental Politics of the Middle East, edited by Harry Verhoeven Déjà Vu in the Kingdom of Jordan? Towards a New Arab Moment The Arabs and the Democratic Path
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1