Antimicrobial resistance genes of Escherichia coli, a bacterium of "One Health" importance in South Africa: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.7 Q3 MICROBIOLOGY AIMS Microbiology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3934/microbiol.2023005
Tsepo Ramatla, Mpho Tawana, Kgaugelo E Lekota, Oriel Thekisoe
{"title":"Antimicrobial resistance genes of <i>Escherichia coli</i>, a bacterium of \"One Health\" importance in South Africa: Systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Tsepo Ramatla,&nbsp;Mpho Tawana,&nbsp;Kgaugelo E Lekota,&nbsp;Oriel Thekisoe","doi":"10.3934/microbiol.2023005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This is a systematic review and meta-analysis that evaluated the prevalence of <i>Escherichia coli</i> antibiotic-resistant genes (ARGs) in animals, humans, and the environment in South Africa. This study followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to search and use literature published between 1 January 2000 to 12 December 2021, on the prevalence of South African <i>E. coli</i> isolates' ARGs. Articles were downloaded from African Journals Online, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Google Scholar search engines. A random effects meta-analysis was used to estimate the antibiotic-resistant genes of <i>E. coli</i> in animals, humans, and the environment. Out of 10764 published articles, only 23 studies met the inclusion criteria. The obtained results indicated that the pooled prevalence estimates (PPE) of <i>E</i>. <i>coli</i> ARGs was 36.3%, 34.4%, 32.9%, and 28.8% for <i>bla<sub>TEM-M-1</sub></i> , <i>amp</i>C, <i>tet</i>A, and <i>bla</i> <sub>TEM</sub>, respectively. Eight ARGs (<i>bla<sub>CTX-M</sub></i> , <i>bla<sub>CTX-M-1</sub></i> , <i>bla<sub>TEM</sub></i> , <i>tet</i>A, <i>tet</i>B, <i>sul</i>1, <i>sul</i>II, and <i>aad</i>A) were detected in humans, animals and the environmental samples. Human <i>E. coli</i> isolate samples harboured 38% of the ARGs. Analyzed data from this study highlights the occurrence of ARGs in <i>E. coli</i> isolates from animals, humans, and environmental samples in South Africa. Therefore, there is a necessity to develop a comprehensive \"One Health\" strategy to assess antibiotics use in order to understand the causes and dynamics of antibiotic resistance development, as such information will enable the formulation of intervention strategies to stop the spread of ARGs in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":46108,"journal":{"name":"AIMS Microbiology","volume":"9 1","pages":"75-89"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9988412/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIMS Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3934/microbiol.2023005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This is a systematic review and meta-analysis that evaluated the prevalence of Escherichia coli antibiotic-resistant genes (ARGs) in animals, humans, and the environment in South Africa. This study followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to search and use literature published between 1 January 2000 to 12 December 2021, on the prevalence of South African E. coli isolates' ARGs. Articles were downloaded from African Journals Online, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Google Scholar search engines. A random effects meta-analysis was used to estimate the antibiotic-resistant genes of E. coli in animals, humans, and the environment. Out of 10764 published articles, only 23 studies met the inclusion criteria. The obtained results indicated that the pooled prevalence estimates (PPE) of E. coli ARGs was 36.3%, 34.4%, 32.9%, and 28.8% for blaTEM-M-1 , ampC, tetA, and bla TEM, respectively. Eight ARGs (blaCTX-M , blaCTX-M-1 , blaTEM , tetA, tetB, sul1, sulII, and aadA) were detected in humans, animals and the environmental samples. Human E. coli isolate samples harboured 38% of the ARGs. Analyzed data from this study highlights the occurrence of ARGs in E. coli isolates from animals, humans, and environmental samples in South Africa. Therefore, there is a necessity to develop a comprehensive "One Health" strategy to assess antibiotics use in order to understand the causes and dynamics of antibiotic resistance development, as such information will enable the formulation of intervention strategies to stop the spread of ARGs in the future.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非“同一个健康”重要细菌大肠杆菌的抗微生物药物耐药基因:系统回顾和荟萃分析
这是一项系统综述和荟萃分析,评估了南非动物、人类和环境中大肠杆菌耐药基因(ARGs)的流行情况。本研究遵循系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,检索和使用2000年1月1日至2021年12月12日期间发表的关于南非大肠杆菌分离株ARGs流行情况的文献。文章从非洲期刊在线、PubMed、ScienceDirect、Scopus和Google Scholar搜索引擎下载。随机效应荟萃分析用于估计动物、人类和环境中大肠杆菌的抗生素耐药基因。在10764篇已发表的文章中,只有23篇研究符合纳入标准。结果表明,blem - m -1、ampC、tetA和blaTEM对大肠杆菌ARGs的总流行率分别为36.3%、34.4%、32.9%和28.8%。在人、动物和环境样品中检测到8种ARGs (blaCTX-M、blaCTX-M-1、blaTEM、tetA、tetB、sul1、sulII和aadA)。人类大肠杆菌分离样本含有38%的ARGs。本研究的分析数据强调了在南非从动物、人类和环境样本中分离出的大肠杆菌中存在ARGs。因此,有必要制定一项全面的"同一个健康"战略来评估抗生素的使用情况,以便了解抗生素耐药性发展的原因和动态,因为这些信息将有助于制定干预战略,以在未来阻止ARGs的传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AIMS Microbiology
AIMS Microbiology MICROBIOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.10%
发文量
22
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Microbes' role in environmental pollution and remediation: a bioeconomy focus approach. Fungal photoinactivation doses for UV radiation and visible light-a data collection. The reduction of abiotic stress in food crops through climate-smart mycorrhiza-enriched biofertilizer. Marine microfossils: Tiny archives of ocean changes through deep time. Genetic diversity of Listeria monocytogenes from seafood products, its processing environment, and clinical origin in the Western Cape, South Africa using whole genome sequencing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1