Comparative study of the effects of simulation models on the electronic and electrical parameters of a silicon pv cell

Kpéli Esso Ehanam Tchedre, M. Savadogo, Guy Serge Tchouadep, I. Zerbo, M. Zoungrana
{"title":"Comparative study of the effects of simulation models on the electronic and electrical parameters of a silicon pv cell","authors":"Kpéli Esso Ehanam Tchedre, M. Savadogo, Guy Serge Tchouadep, I. Zerbo, M. Zoungrana","doi":"10.4314/gjpas.v29i1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"  \nFor silicon solar cells simulation studies, one dimensional (1D), two dimensional 2D) and t \n  \nhree dimensional (3D) models are used. Depending of model proposed and assumptions done for the study, the electronic and electrical parameters and then the performance of the solar cell can be influenced. \nThis situation raises the problem of the relevance of the choice of the study model and the quality of the resulting results. This work, propose comparative study of the electronic and electric parameters of 1D model, 3D analytical model and 3D empirical model. In this study, continuity equations of excess minority electrons are solved for 1D and 3D models and analytical expressions of electronic parameters (density of electrons δ, intrinsic junction recombination velocity Sf0 and recombination velocity at back surface Sb) and electric parameters (Jsc, Voc, η) are derived. The influence of the model chosen on the electric and electronic parameters of the PV cell have been presented. \nIt appears in this study that the choice of the simulation model has a large influence on the electronic and electrical parameters the PV cell. The one-dimensional formulation (1D) overestimates the solar cell efficiency comparatively to the three-dimensional (3D) formulations. The study put in evidence also that for the same grain size, the solar cell efficiency resulting of 3D classical formulation is overestimates than one resulting of 3D empirical formulation. \n  \n ","PeriodicalId":12516,"journal":{"name":"Global Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/gjpas.v29i1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

  For silicon solar cells simulation studies, one dimensional (1D), two dimensional 2D) and t   hree dimensional (3D) models are used. Depending of model proposed and assumptions done for the study, the electronic and electrical parameters and then the performance of the solar cell can be influenced. This situation raises the problem of the relevance of the choice of the study model and the quality of the resulting results. This work, propose comparative study of the electronic and electric parameters of 1D model, 3D analytical model and 3D empirical model. In this study, continuity equations of excess minority electrons are solved for 1D and 3D models and analytical expressions of electronic parameters (density of electrons δ, intrinsic junction recombination velocity Sf0 and recombination velocity at back surface Sb) and electric parameters (Jsc, Voc, η) are derived. The influence of the model chosen on the electric and electronic parameters of the PV cell have been presented. It appears in this study that the choice of the simulation model has a large influence on the electronic and electrical parameters the PV cell. The one-dimensional formulation (1D) overestimates the solar cell efficiency comparatively to the three-dimensional (3D) formulations. The study put in evidence also that for the same grain size, the solar cell efficiency resulting of 3D classical formulation is overestimates than one resulting of 3D empirical formulation.    
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模拟模型对硅光伏电池电学参数影响的比较研究
对于硅太阳能电池的模拟研究,使用一维(1D),二维(2D)和三维(3D)模型。根据所提出的模型和所做的假设,可以影响太阳能电池的电子和电气参数,进而影响太阳能电池的性能。这种情况提出了研究模型的选择和结果质量的相关性问题。本文提出了对一维模型、三维解析模型和三维经验模型的电、电参数进行比较研究。在本研究中,求解了一维和三维模型中过量少数电子的连续性方程,推导了电子参数(电子密度δ、本征结复合速度Sf0和后表面复合速度Sb)和电参数(Jsc、Voc、η)的解析表达式。给出了模型的选择对光伏电池电学参数的影响。在本研究中可以看出,仿真模型的选择对光伏电池的电子和电气参数有很大的影响。与三维(3D)配方相比,一维配方(1D)高估了太阳能电池效率。研究还表明,在相同晶粒尺寸的情况下,三维经典配方的太阳能电池效率比三维经验配方的效率要高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Humic substances in soils of diverse parent materials in humid tropical environment of south east nigeria. Heavy Metal Contamination In Surface Water And Macrobrachium Tissues Along Eagle Island, Niger Delta, Nigeria Synthesis And Characterization Of Optical And Structural Properties Of Inorganic And Green Leaf Doped Sno Thin Films Deposited Using Spray Pyrolysis Comparative Cost-Benefits Analysis Among Rain-Fed And Irrigated Sugarcane Production Farming Systems In Bauchi State, Nigeria Prevalence And Determinants Of Malnutrition Among Under-Five Children In Selected Primary Schools In Nasarawa Town
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1