{"title":"Left Ventricular Systolic Unloading and Augmentation of Intracoronary Pressure and Doppler Flow During Enhanced External Counterpulsation","authors":"A. Michaels, M. Accad, T. Ports, W. Grossman","doi":"10.1161/01.CIR.0000028336.95629.B0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background—Enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) is a noninvasive, pneumatic technique that provides beneficial effects for patients with chronic, symptomatic angina pectoris. However, the physiological effects of EECP have not been studied directly. We examined intracoronary and left ventricular hemodynamics in the cardiac catheterization laboratory during EECP. Methods and Results—Ten patients referred for diagnostic evaluation underwent left heart catheterization and coronary angiography from the radial artery. At baseline and then during EECP, central aortic pressure, intracoronary pressure, and intracoronary Doppler flow velocity were measured using a coronary catheter, a sensor-tipped high-fidelity pressure guidewire, and a Doppler flow guidewire, respectively. Similar to changes in aortic pressure, EECP resulted in a dramatic increase in diastolic (71±10 mm Hg at baseline to 137±21 mm Hg during EECP; +93%;P <0.0001) and mean intracoronary pressures (88±9 to 102±16 mm Hg; +16%;P =0.006) with a decrease in systolic pressure (116±20 to 99±26 mm Hg; −15%;P =0.002). The intracoronary Doppler measure of average peak velocity increased from 11±5 cm/s at baseline to 23±5 cm/s during EECP (+109%;P =0.001). The TIMI frame count, a quantitative angiographic measure of coronary flow, showed a 28% increase in coronary flow during EECP compared with baseline (P =0.001). Conclusions—EECP unequivocally and significantly increases diastolic and mean pressures and reduces systolic pressure in the central aorta and the coronary artery. Coronary artery flow, determined by both Doppler and angiographic techniques, is increased during EECP. The combined effects of systolic unloading and increased coronary perfusion pressure provide evidence that EECP may serve as a potential mechanical assist device.","PeriodicalId":10194,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":"27 1","pages":"1237-1242"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"184","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000028336.95629.B0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 184
Abstract
Background—Enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) is a noninvasive, pneumatic technique that provides beneficial effects for patients with chronic, symptomatic angina pectoris. However, the physiological effects of EECP have not been studied directly. We examined intracoronary and left ventricular hemodynamics in the cardiac catheterization laboratory during EECP. Methods and Results—Ten patients referred for diagnostic evaluation underwent left heart catheterization and coronary angiography from the radial artery. At baseline and then during EECP, central aortic pressure, intracoronary pressure, and intracoronary Doppler flow velocity were measured using a coronary catheter, a sensor-tipped high-fidelity pressure guidewire, and a Doppler flow guidewire, respectively. Similar to changes in aortic pressure, EECP resulted in a dramatic increase in diastolic (71±10 mm Hg at baseline to 137±21 mm Hg during EECP; +93%;P <0.0001) and mean intracoronary pressures (88±9 to 102±16 mm Hg; +16%;P =0.006) with a decrease in systolic pressure (116±20 to 99±26 mm Hg; −15%;P =0.002). The intracoronary Doppler measure of average peak velocity increased from 11±5 cm/s at baseline to 23±5 cm/s during EECP (+109%;P =0.001). The TIMI frame count, a quantitative angiographic measure of coronary flow, showed a 28% increase in coronary flow during EECP compared with baseline (P =0.001). Conclusions—EECP unequivocally and significantly increases diastolic and mean pressures and reduces systolic pressure in the central aorta and the coronary artery. Coronary artery flow, determined by both Doppler and angiographic techniques, is increased during EECP. The combined effects of systolic unloading and increased coronary perfusion pressure provide evidence that EECP may serve as a potential mechanical assist device.
背景:增强体外反搏(EECP)是一种无创的气动技术,可为慢性症状性心绞痛患者提供有益的效果。然而,EECP的生理作用尚未得到直接研究。在EECP期间,我们在心导管实验室检查冠状动脉内和左心室血流动力学。方法与结果:10例确诊患者均行左心导管穿刺及桡动脉冠状动脉造影。在基线和EECP期间,分别使用冠状动脉导管、传感器尖端的高保真压力导丝和多普勒血流导丝测量中心主动脉压、冠状动脉内压和冠状动脉内多普勒血流速度。与主动脉压变化相似,EECP导致舒张压急剧升高(基线时71±10 mm Hg)至137±21 mm Hg;+93%, P <0.0001),平均冠状动脉内压(88±9 ~ 102±16 mm Hg);+16%, P =0.006),收缩压下降(116±20 ~ 99±26 mm Hg);−15%;P = 0.002)。冠状动脉内多普勒测量的平均峰值速度从基线时的11±5 cm/s增加到EECP期间的23±5 cm/s (+109%, P =0.001)。TIMI框架计数,冠状动脉血流的定量血管造影测量,显示与基线相比,EECP期间冠状动脉血流增加28% (P =0.001)。结论:eecp明确且显著地增加了中央主动脉和冠状动脉的舒张压和平均压,降低了收缩压。冠状动脉血流,由多普勒和血管造影技术确定,在EECP期间增加。收缩期卸荷和冠脉灌注压升高的联合作用证明EECP可能作为一种潜在的机械辅助装置。