Population Involvement in Dealing with Local Community Problems in the Rural Areas of Latvia

M. Pelse, L. Švānberga, Arianna Todorova, Sabine Berzina, Beate Jurgensone, Raivis Stepans
{"title":"Population Involvement in Dealing with Local Community Problems in the Rural Areas of Latvia","authors":"M. Pelse, L. Švānberga, Arianna Todorova, Sabine Berzina, Beate Jurgensone, Raivis Stepans","doi":"10.22616/esrd.2021.55.060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The public prefers to express their opinions on the development of the surrounding area, make assessments and comments, as well as participate in surveys. However, the involvement of the public itself in improving the immediate surroundings and in solving the problems of its fellows is not always sufficient. The research aims to determine whether there are differences in public involvement in addressing municipal problems across various population groups within a municipality. The paper presents the results of an extensive survey. The research considered problems within one municipality in Latvia – Jelgava municipality – and analysed the rural territories located in the immediate vicinity of the centre of the municipality as well as those being the furthest from the centre. The results of the research revealed that young people were most satisfied with their lives in their municipality if their places of residence were closer to the centre of the municipality. The ability to influence the decisions of one’s own local government was highly valued by residents in the age group from 26 to 44 years in the rural territories that were in the immediate vicinity of the centre the municipality, yet this possibility was most often rated as weak among the youth living in the most remote rural territories from the centre of the municipality. Population involvement in solving a problem relevant to the society was the most frequently used way when the population requested a municipal employee to solve this problem. A large segment of the society in rural areas admitted that they did nothing, and this passivity was also evident in the group of young people who lived further away from the centre of the municipality. The involvement of the population in national-level public activities across all age groups and territories was quite equal, as the active population were involved in Saeima elections, campaigns for collecting signatures and donating various thing","PeriodicalId":63151,"journal":{"name":"黄河文明与可持续发展","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"黄河文明与可持续发展","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22616/esrd.2021.55.060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The public prefers to express their opinions on the development of the surrounding area, make assessments and comments, as well as participate in surveys. However, the involvement of the public itself in improving the immediate surroundings and in solving the problems of its fellows is not always sufficient. The research aims to determine whether there are differences in public involvement in addressing municipal problems across various population groups within a municipality. The paper presents the results of an extensive survey. The research considered problems within one municipality in Latvia – Jelgava municipality – and analysed the rural territories located in the immediate vicinity of the centre of the municipality as well as those being the furthest from the centre. The results of the research revealed that young people were most satisfied with their lives in their municipality if their places of residence were closer to the centre of the municipality. The ability to influence the decisions of one’s own local government was highly valued by residents in the age group from 26 to 44 years in the rural territories that were in the immediate vicinity of the centre the municipality, yet this possibility was most often rated as weak among the youth living in the most remote rural territories from the centre of the municipality. Population involvement in solving a problem relevant to the society was the most frequently used way when the population requested a municipal employee to solve this problem. A large segment of the society in rural areas admitted that they did nothing, and this passivity was also evident in the group of young people who lived further away from the centre of the municipality. The involvement of the population in national-level public activities across all age groups and territories was quite equal, as the active population were involved in Saeima elections, campaigns for collecting signatures and donating various thing
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人口参与处理拉脱维亚农村地区的当地社区问题
公众更愿意对周边地区的发展表达自己的意见,进行评估和评论,以及参与调查。然而,公众本身参与改善周围环境和解决同伴的问题并不总是足够的。这项研究的目的是确定在解决市政问题方面,一个城市内不同人口群体的公众参与度是否存在差异。这篇论文提出了一项广泛调查的结果。这项研究考虑了拉脱维亚一个城市- -叶尔加瓦市- -的问题,并分析了紧邻该城市中心的农村地区以及离中心最远的农村地区。研究结果显示,如果年轻人的居住地离城市中心更近,他们对自己所在城市的生活最满意。在离城市中心很近的农村地区,26岁至44岁年龄组的居民非常重视影响自己地方政府决策的能力,然而,在离城市中心最偏远的农村地区生活的青年中,这种可能性往往被认为很弱。人口参与解决与社会有关的问题是人口要求市政雇员解决这一问题时最常用的方式。农村地区社会的很大一部分人承认他们什么也不做,这种被动态度在远离城市中心的年轻人群体中也很明显。所有年龄组和地区的人口参与国家一级的公共活动是相当平等的,因为活跃的人口参与了议会选举、收集签名的运动和捐赠各种东西
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
271
期刊最新文献
Concrete Rebar Corrosion Inhibitors - A Review of Sustainable Natural Inhibitors Mineral Rent – Human Development Nexus: Experience from Selected Sub Sahara African Countries Assessing Postgraduate Students’ Satisfaction with Management Services in Residences of Higher Education Institutions for Lifelong Learning Opportunities Societal Perception of National Resilience to a Pandemic Investigation of Fuel Properties and Engine Analysis of Desert Dates Biodiesel of Ghanaian Origin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1