Clinical appraisal of corpora cavernosa injuries (penile fracture): Retrospective review of 69 patients in Benghazi, Libya

Muftah Elkhafifi, Wael Y. Alaorfi
{"title":"Clinical appraisal of corpora cavernosa injuries (penile fracture): Retrospective review of 69 patients in Benghazi, Libya","authors":"Muftah Elkhafifi, Wael Y. Alaorfi","doi":"10.4103/LJMS.LJMS_60_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aim: Penile fracture is a relatively rare urological emergency. The aim of this study was to review the experience with 69 consecutive cases in Benghazi, Libya. Patients and Methods: Records of 69 penile fracture cases who presented between January 1997 and December 2018 to Hawari Center for Urology, Benghazi, Libya were retrospectively reviewed. Penile fracture diagnosis was based on classic history and typical physical signs. Surgical exploration was performed for all patients under spinal anesthesia. Results: The most common mechanism of penile fracture was self-inflicted forceful bending (manipulation) of erected penis which account for 39 (56.5%) patients, followed by vigorous sexual intercourse in 19 (27.5%) patients, masturbation in five (7.2%) patients, rolling over an erect penis in bed in five (7.2%) patients, and slipping in WC in one (1.5%) patient. Clinical features at presentation include intense pain in 97%, sudden audible popping sound in 87%, rapid de tumescence in 94.2%, followed by development of swelling and ecchymosis in all patients (100%). All patients were treated surgically and no intraoperative or immediate postoperative complications were encountered. During the follow-up period, all patients had normal urinary steam and normal sexual function was experienced by 97.1% of the patients. Five patients (7.2%) had long-term complications: penile hypoesthesia (one patient), painful erection (one patient), penile curvature of <15o on erection (one patient), and mild erectile dysfunction (two patients). Most patients were discharged home on postoperative day 1. Conclusion: Penile fracture occurred mainly due to forceful sexual manipulation of erected penis, and diagnosis can be made clinically. Immediate surgical repair is the only option to avoid complications.","PeriodicalId":18055,"journal":{"name":"Libyan Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"30 1","pages":"17 - 20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Libyan Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/LJMS.LJMS_60_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aim: Penile fracture is a relatively rare urological emergency. The aim of this study was to review the experience with 69 consecutive cases in Benghazi, Libya. Patients and Methods: Records of 69 penile fracture cases who presented between January 1997 and December 2018 to Hawari Center for Urology, Benghazi, Libya were retrospectively reviewed. Penile fracture diagnosis was based on classic history and typical physical signs. Surgical exploration was performed for all patients under spinal anesthesia. Results: The most common mechanism of penile fracture was self-inflicted forceful bending (manipulation) of erected penis which account for 39 (56.5%) patients, followed by vigorous sexual intercourse in 19 (27.5%) patients, masturbation in five (7.2%) patients, rolling over an erect penis in bed in five (7.2%) patients, and slipping in WC in one (1.5%) patient. Clinical features at presentation include intense pain in 97%, sudden audible popping sound in 87%, rapid de tumescence in 94.2%, followed by development of swelling and ecchymosis in all patients (100%). All patients were treated surgically and no intraoperative or immediate postoperative complications were encountered. During the follow-up period, all patients had normal urinary steam and normal sexual function was experienced by 97.1% of the patients. Five patients (7.2%) had long-term complications: penile hypoesthesia (one patient), painful erection (one patient), penile curvature of <15o on erection (one patient), and mild erectile dysfunction (two patients). Most patients were discharged home on postoperative day 1. Conclusion: Penile fracture occurred mainly due to forceful sexual manipulation of erected penis, and diagnosis can be made clinically. Immediate surgical repair is the only option to avoid complications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
海绵体损伤(阴茎骨折)的临床评价:对利比亚班加西69例患者的回顾性分析
背景与目的:阴茎骨折是一种较为罕见的泌尿外科急症。本研究的目的是回顾利比亚班加西69个连续病例的经验。患者和方法:回顾性分析了1997年1月至2018年12月在利比亚班加西Hawari泌尿外科中心就诊的69例阴茎骨折病例的记录。阴茎骨折的诊断基于经典病史和典型体征。所有患者均在脊髓麻醉下行手术探查。结果:阴茎骨折最常见的机制是自行强行弯曲(操纵)勃起阴茎39例(56.5%),其次是剧烈性交19例(27.5%),手淫5例(7.2%),床上翻滚勃起阴茎5例(7.2%),滑倒尿路1例(1.5%)。临床表现包括97%的患者剧烈疼痛,87%的患者突然可听到爆裂声,94.2%的患者迅速消退,所有患者(100%)均出现肿胀和瘀斑。所有患者均行手术治疗,无术中或术后立即并发症发生。随访期间,所有患者尿汽正常,97.1%的患者性功能正常。5例(7.2%)患者存在长期并发症:阴茎感觉减退1例,勃起疼痛1例,勃起时阴茎弯曲< 150度1例,轻度勃起功能障碍2例。大多数患者在术后第1天出院。结论:阴茎骨折主要是由于对勃起阴茎的强力性操作所致,可进行临床诊断。立即手术修复是避免并发症的唯一选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating quality of anticoagulation management among antiphospholipid syndrome patients: An observational cohort study Effectiveness and safety of direct-acting antiviral in hemodialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C: A real clinical experience Clinical venous thromboembolism in spinal trauma with and without spinal cord injury: A 3-year experience of midlands centre for spinal injuries, Oswestry, UK The incidence and risk factors for barotrauma in COVID-19 in intensive care unit, a single-center retrospective study Anabolic androgenic steroids-induced acute “Tombstone” ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1