The New Timor Sea Treaty and Interim Arrangements for Joint Development of Petroleum Resources of the Timor Gap

G. Triggs, D. Bialek
{"title":"The New Timor Sea Treaty and Interim Arrangements for Joint Development of Petroleum Resources of the Timor Gap","authors":"G. Triggs, D. Bialek","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.423323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Under the Timor Sea Treaty of 2002, Australia and the newly independent East Timor have agreed upon joint development of the petroleum resources of the disputed Timor Gap. Until this treaty comes into force, an Exchange of Notes applies the terms of the 1989 Timor Gap Treaty, with Australia and East Timor as the implementing parties. Since gaining independence, East Timor has argued that under current principles of international law, it is entitled to a greater share of the Timor Sea's oil and gas resources than is suggested by the boundaries of the Timor Sea Treaty's Joint Petroleum Development Area (JPDA). Principally, East Timor asserts that the western and eastern lines defining the JPDA are ill-founded at international law, a claim that has immediate implications for the joint venture partners in the Greater Sunrise fields that straddle the JPDA's eastern boundary. This paper examines the legal background to the Timor Gap dispute, the agreements that have regulated resource exploitation of the area since 1989, the validity of the respective seabed rights of Indonesia, Australia and East Timor and finally, the impact of Australia's recent withdrawal of maritime boundary disputes from the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea.","PeriodicalId":42243,"journal":{"name":"Melbourne Journal of International Law","volume":"6 1","pages":"322"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Melbourne Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.423323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Under the Timor Sea Treaty of 2002, Australia and the newly independent East Timor have agreed upon joint development of the petroleum resources of the disputed Timor Gap. Until this treaty comes into force, an Exchange of Notes applies the terms of the 1989 Timor Gap Treaty, with Australia and East Timor as the implementing parties. Since gaining independence, East Timor has argued that under current principles of international law, it is entitled to a greater share of the Timor Sea's oil and gas resources than is suggested by the boundaries of the Timor Sea Treaty's Joint Petroleum Development Area (JPDA). Principally, East Timor asserts that the western and eastern lines defining the JPDA are ill-founded at international law, a claim that has immediate implications for the joint venture partners in the Greater Sunrise fields that straddle the JPDA's eastern boundary. This paper examines the legal background to the Timor Gap dispute, the agreements that have regulated resource exploitation of the area since 1989, the validity of the respective seabed rights of Indonesia, Australia and East Timor and finally, the impact of Australia's recent withdrawal of maritime boundary disputes from the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《新帝汶海条约》和联合开发帝汶峡石油资源的临时安排
根据2002年的《帝汶海条约》,澳大利亚和新独立的东帝汶同意联合开发有争议的帝汶峡的石油资源。在该条约生效之前,交换照会适用1989年《帝汶峡条约》的条款,澳大利亚和东帝汶为执行缔约国。自从获得独立以来,东帝汶争辩说,根据目前的国际法原则,它有权获得帝汶海石油和天然气资源的更大份额,而不是根据《帝汶海条约》的联合石油开发区的边界所建议的份额。东帝汶的主要主张是,界定JPDA的东西线在国际法上是没有根据的,这一主张对跨越JPDA东部边界的大日出油田的合资伙伴有直接影响。本文考察了帝汶峡争端的法律背景,自1989年以来规范该地区资源开发的协议,印度尼西亚、澳大利亚和东帝汶各自海底权利的有效性,最后,澳大利亚最近将海洋边界争端从国际法院和国际海洋法法庭的管辖范围内撤出的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊最新文献
Protection of Climate Displaced Persons under International Law: A Case Study from Mataso Island, Vanuatu Indigenous Consent: A Self-Determination Perspective A Requiem for the Trans-Pacific Partnership: Something New, Something Old and Something Borrowed? International cooperation and responsibility sharing to combat climate change: Lessons for international refugee law Affective Critique: Fear, Hope, Abandonment and Pleasure in Dianne Otto's Living with International Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1