Twofold pictorial experience, propositional imagining and recognitional concepts: a critique of Walton’s visual make-believe

Q2 Arts and Humanities Phenomenology and Mind Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI:10.13128/PHE_MI-23665
M. Arienti
{"title":"Twofold pictorial experience, propositional imagining and recognitional concepts: a critique of Walton’s visual make-believe","authors":"M. Arienti","doi":"10.13128/PHE_MI-23665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Kendall Walton has defined pictorial experience as a visual game of make-believe, which consists in imagining our actual seeing the representational prop to be a fictional face to face seeing the represented subject. To maintain a twofold awareness of these two visual aspects while avoiding a phenomenal clash between them, Walton needs to characterise visual make-believe as involving a propositional imagining. Unfortunately, the strategy does not seem to be successful. Whether propositional imagination is taken as a simple descriptive report or as conceptually penetrating our perception, Walton’s account is not able to secure the visual and the twofold character of pictorial recognition.","PeriodicalId":37133,"journal":{"name":"Phenomenology and Mind","volume":"47 1","pages":"146-156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phenomenology and Mind","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13128/PHE_MI-23665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Kendall Walton has defined pictorial experience as a visual game of make-believe, which consists in imagining our actual seeing the representational prop to be a fictional face to face seeing the represented subject. To maintain a twofold awareness of these two visual aspects while avoiding a phenomenal clash between them, Walton needs to characterise visual make-believe as involving a propositional imagining. Unfortunately, the strategy does not seem to be successful. Whether propositional imagination is taken as a simple descriptive report or as conceptually penetrating our perception, Walton’s account is not able to secure the visual and the twofold character of pictorial recognition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双重图像体验、命题想象与认知概念:沃尔顿视觉虚构批判
肯德尔·沃尔顿(Kendall Walton)将绘画体验定义为一种假装的视觉游戏,它包括将我们实际看到的代表性道具想象为虚构的面对面看到被代表的主体。为了保持对这两个视觉方面的双重意识,同时避免它们之间的显著冲突,沃尔顿需要将视觉虚构描述为涉及命题想象。不幸的是,这一策略似乎并不成功。无论命题想象是作为一个简单的描述性报告,还是作为概念上穿透我们的感知,沃尔顿的描述都不能保证图像识别的视觉和双重特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Phenomenology and Mind
Phenomenology and Mind Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Husserl and Non-Formal Ethics Review of Roberta de Monticelli’s Towards a Phenomenological Axiology The Foundation of Evaluation and Volition on Cognition: a New Contribution to the Debate over Husserl’s Account of Objectifying and Non-Objectifying Acts Are Emotions Valueceptions or Responses to Values? Husserl’s Phenomenology of Affectivity Reconsidered The Experience of Value. The Influence of Scheler on Sartre’s Early Ethics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1