"Any Reason is Valid:" How an Unexpected Abortion Disclosure is Received by an Online Community.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Social Work in Public Health Pub Date : 2023-02-17 DOI:10.1080/19371918.2022.2096736
Aubrey Jones, Melody Huslage, Miranda Dalton
{"title":"\"Any Reason is Valid:\" How an Unexpected Abortion Disclosure is Received by an Online Community.","authors":"Aubrey Jones,&nbsp;Melody Huslage,&nbsp;Miranda Dalton","doi":"10.1080/19371918.2022.2096736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study utilized a social media post by a well-known social media influencer and the accompanying 63 responses to explore feelings and experiences related to abortion. This study employed qualitative thematic analysis and identified three themes related to reasons for abortion (i.e., <i>relationship issues, not being ready for pregnancy</i>, and <i>other reasons</i>) and one supplemental theme of <i>bystander support</i>. Findings highlight the efforts of many respondents to normalize abortion as an issue of women's health and women's rights. In fact, in response to the original post's discussion regarding valid reasons for an abortion, most respondents remarked similarly that any reason is valid. While study limitations include concerns regarding generalizability, this study provides access to abortion experiences outside of a traditional health clinic survey and insight into the abortion beliefs of women, both who have and have not experienced an abortion. Findings are in line with previous studies which found that multiple reasons are cited for obtaining an abortion, but also revealed a more supportive climate than the divisive discourse typically portrayed in the media. This suggests the timing may be conducive for efforts aiming to normalize abortion and reduce stigma, including potential avenues for interventions (e.g., social networks and platforms). Lastly, the innovative use of social media to inform this study should be considered by others as they seek to understand and explore topics that can be challenging to study.</p>","PeriodicalId":46944,"journal":{"name":"Social Work in Public Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Work in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19371918.2022.2096736","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study utilized a social media post by a well-known social media influencer and the accompanying 63 responses to explore feelings and experiences related to abortion. This study employed qualitative thematic analysis and identified three themes related to reasons for abortion (i.e., relationship issues, not being ready for pregnancy, and other reasons) and one supplemental theme of bystander support. Findings highlight the efforts of many respondents to normalize abortion as an issue of women's health and women's rights. In fact, in response to the original post's discussion regarding valid reasons for an abortion, most respondents remarked similarly that any reason is valid. While study limitations include concerns regarding generalizability, this study provides access to abortion experiences outside of a traditional health clinic survey and insight into the abortion beliefs of women, both who have and have not experienced an abortion. Findings are in line with previous studies which found that multiple reasons are cited for obtaining an abortion, but also revealed a more supportive climate than the divisive discourse typically portrayed in the media. This suggests the timing may be conducive for efforts aiming to normalize abortion and reduce stigma, including potential avenues for interventions (e.g., social networks and platforms). Lastly, the innovative use of social media to inform this study should be considered by others as they seek to understand and explore topics that can be challenging to study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“任何理由都是有效的:”在线社区如何接受意外堕胎的披露。
这项研究利用了一位知名社交媒体影响者的社交媒体帖子和伴随的63个回复来探索与堕胎相关的感受和经历。本研究采用定性主题分析,确定了与堕胎原因相关的三个主题(即关系问题,未准备好怀孕和其他原因)和一个旁观者支持的补充主题。调查结果突出表明,许多答复者努力使堕胎作为妇女健康和妇女权利的一个问题正常化。事实上,在回复原始帖子关于堕胎正当理由的讨论时,大多数受访者都表示,任何理由都是正当的。虽然研究的局限性包括对普遍性的担忧,但本研究提供了在传统健康诊所调查之外的堕胎经验,并深入了解了有过和没有经历过堕胎的妇女的堕胎信念。调查结果与之前的研究一致,即堕胎的原因有多种,但也显示出比媒体通常描绘的分裂话语更支持的氛围。这表明,时机可能有利于旨在使堕胎正常化和减少耻辱的努力,包括潜在的干预途径(例如,社交网络和平台)。最后,当其他人试图理解和探索可能具有挑战性的研究主题时,应该考虑创新地使用社交媒体来为本研究提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Social Work in Public Health (recently re-titled from the Journal of Health & Social Policy to better reflect its focus) provides a much-needed forum for social workers and those in health and health-related professions. This crucial journal focuses on all aspects of policy and social and health care considerations in policy-related matters, including its development, formulation, implementation, evaluation, review, and revision. By blending conceptual and practical considerations, Social Work in Public Health enables authors from many disciplines to examine health and social policy issues, concerns, and questions.
期刊最新文献
Pubertal Development and Pregnancy Outcomes Among System-Involved Youth. How to Reduce the Influence of COVID-19 Epidemic on Employees' Anxiety of Continuous Work in China? Empirical Analysis Based on Industrial Enterprises. Child Maltreatment and Self-rated Health: Mediating Effect of Parent-child Conversation and Moderating Effect of Gender. Black Male Veterans' Mental Health: Exploring Their Lived Experiences. No Man Is an Island: Resiliency Among Older African American Men Living with HIV.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1