Book Review: Megadrought in the Carolinas. The Archaeology of Mississippian Collapse, Abandonment, and Coalescence by John S Cable

IF 0.7 4区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY NORTH AMERICAN ARCHAEOLOGIST Pub Date : 2022-05-22 DOI:10.1177/01976931221102978
Mark R Barnes
{"title":"Book Review: Megadrought in the Carolinas. The Archaeology of Mississippian Collapse, Abandonment, and Coalescence by John S Cable","authors":"Mark R Barnes","doi":"10.1177/01976931221102978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author of this work, John S. Cable, and this reviewer share a common professional background: both of us began our archaeological careers in the American Southwest where we were exposed to the “Big Science Question” of what caused the Hohokam and other major Southwestern cultures to disappear in the 1400s? In the latter part of our careers, we both found ourselves in the Southeastern United States considering another “Big” question: what happened to make Mississippian groups relocate from and/or abandon large areas of this region during that same time period? The overall intent of Cable’s work is to understand why such large areas of the southern half the United States were abandoned or showed a major relocation of seemingly viable cultures during the mid-fifteenth century. Cable presents his findings on what happened in this time period during which two major cultural societies either disappeared (Hohokam) or experienced major relocation and down-sizing of settlements (Mississippian). Cable’s initial conclusions are based on several years of Cultural Resources Management work at the Francis Marion National Forest along the coast of South Carolina in which he identified and evaluated for National Register eligibility (the Section 106 process) numerous sites under the jurisdiction of the United States Forest Service, Department of Agriculture. From the totality of this work, Cable demonstrated “this region had... experienced societal collapse and regional abandonment” (2020: xii) in the mid-fifteenth century. Looking further afield, Cable notes that archaeologists had found a similar situation in the Savannah River to the south and coastal areas to the north. These changes coincided with the Medieval Climatic Anomaly (MCA), a period of warmer temperatures and extended droughts, which would have caused serious problems for Native American food production all along the Southeastern Coastal environment from Cape Fear in North Carolina to the Ogeeche River Basin in Georgia (2020: xii, 1–2). Building on this information, the Book Review","PeriodicalId":43677,"journal":{"name":"NORTH AMERICAN ARCHAEOLOGIST","volume":"9 1","pages":"284 - 288"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NORTH AMERICAN ARCHAEOLOGIST","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01976931221102978","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The author of this work, John S. Cable, and this reviewer share a common professional background: both of us began our archaeological careers in the American Southwest where we were exposed to the “Big Science Question” of what caused the Hohokam and other major Southwestern cultures to disappear in the 1400s? In the latter part of our careers, we both found ourselves in the Southeastern United States considering another “Big” question: what happened to make Mississippian groups relocate from and/or abandon large areas of this region during that same time period? The overall intent of Cable’s work is to understand why such large areas of the southern half the United States were abandoned or showed a major relocation of seemingly viable cultures during the mid-fifteenth century. Cable presents his findings on what happened in this time period during which two major cultural societies either disappeared (Hohokam) or experienced major relocation and down-sizing of settlements (Mississippian). Cable’s initial conclusions are based on several years of Cultural Resources Management work at the Francis Marion National Forest along the coast of South Carolina in which he identified and evaluated for National Register eligibility (the Section 106 process) numerous sites under the jurisdiction of the United States Forest Service, Department of Agriculture. From the totality of this work, Cable demonstrated “this region had... experienced societal collapse and regional abandonment” (2020: xii) in the mid-fifteenth century. Looking further afield, Cable notes that archaeologists had found a similar situation in the Savannah River to the south and coastal areas to the north. These changes coincided with the Medieval Climatic Anomaly (MCA), a period of warmer temperatures and extended droughts, which would have caused serious problems for Native American food production all along the Southeastern Coastal environment from Cape Fear in North Carolina to the Ogeeche River Basin in Georgia (2020: xii, 1–2). Building on this information, the Book Review
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
书评:卡罗来纳州的特大旱灾。《密西西比崩塌、遗弃和合并的考古学》约翰·S·凯布尔著
这本书的作者约翰·s·凯布尔(John S. Cable)和本文作者有着共同的专业背景:我们都是在美国西南部开始了我们的考古生涯,在那里我们接触到了“大科学问题”,即是什么导致了霍霍坎和其他主要的西南文化在15世纪消失?在我们职业生涯的后期,我们都发现自己在美国东南部考虑另一个“大”问题:在同一时期,是什么原因使密西西比人从该地区搬迁或放弃了该地区的大片地区?凯布尔工作的总体意图是理解为什么美国南半部的大片地区在15世纪中期被遗弃或显示出看似可行的文化的重大迁移。凯布尔展示了他对这段时间内发生的事情的发现,这段时间内,两个主要的文化社会要么消失了(霍霍坎),要么经历了大规模的迁移和缩小定居点(密西西比)。凯布尔最初的结论是基于他在南卡罗来纳海岸的弗朗西斯·马里恩国家森林的文化资源管理工作,在那里他确定并评估了美国森林服务局和农业部管辖下的许多地点的国家登记资格(第106条程序)。从这项工作的总体来看,凯布尔证明了“这个地区有……(2020: xii)在15世纪中期经历了社会崩溃和区域遗弃。在更远的地方,凯布尔注意到考古学家在南部的萨凡纳河和北部的沿海地区发现了类似的情况。这些变化与中世纪气候异常(MCA)相吻合,这是一段温度升高和干旱延长的时期,这将给从北卡罗来纳州的Cape Fear到佐治亚州的Ogeeche河流域的东南沿海环境中的美洲原住民粮食生产造成严重问题(2020:xii, 1-2)。基于这些信息,书评
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Published quarterly, this is the only general journal dedicated solely to North America—with total coverage of archaeological activity in the United States, Canada, and Northern Mexico (excluding Mesoamerica). The North American Archaeologist surveys all aspects of prehistoric and historic archaeology within an evolutionary perspective, from Paleo-Indian studies to industrial sites. It accents the results of Resource Management and Contract Archaeology, the newest growth areas in archaeology, often neglected in other publications. The Journal regularly and reliably publishes work based on activities in state, provincial and local archaeological societies.
期刊最新文献
A brief history of bison zooarchaeological research in eastern Washington Resituating the deep history of the Chesapeake Kiskiak: The settlement history of a dispersed village in Tidewater Virginia Climate-conscious archaeology: contextualizing drought and history in the Chesapeake Archaeology and Applied Anthropology as a Collaborative Approach to Decolonization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1