Trypanosomiasis, tropical medicine, and the practices of inter-colonial research at Lake Victoria, 1902-07

IF 1 1区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY History and Technology Pub Date : 2019-07-03 DOI:10.1080/07341512.2019.1680151
M. Webel
{"title":"Trypanosomiasis, tropical medicine, and the practices of inter-colonial research at Lake Victoria, 1902-07","authors":"M. Webel","doi":"10.1080/07341512.2019.1680151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT As sleeping sickness appeared in epidemics across Africa c. 1900, it stimulated a race among colonial medical personnel and Europe-based scientists to discover its causative pathogen, its mode of transmission, and, ideally, a cure. Scientists circulated between hubs of research in Europe and key field sites in Africa, monitoring each other’s progress and often maintaining long-term relationships colored by collaboration and competition. The Lake Victoria littoral was an epicenter of both significant mortality and important research before WWI. This article explores the intellectual implications of colonial connectivity at local scale, focusing on changing ideas about sleeping sickness, the communication of research strategies and methods, and the circumstances of life and research in this imperial hinterland and colonial borderland in eastern Africa. Exploring research dynamics around Lake Victoria illuminates the inadequacies of colonial scientific and medical capabilities and both the generative and limiting aspects that the contingencies of colonial research created.","PeriodicalId":45996,"journal":{"name":"History and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07341512.2019.1680151","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT As sleeping sickness appeared in epidemics across Africa c. 1900, it stimulated a race among colonial medical personnel and Europe-based scientists to discover its causative pathogen, its mode of transmission, and, ideally, a cure. Scientists circulated between hubs of research in Europe and key field sites in Africa, monitoring each other’s progress and often maintaining long-term relationships colored by collaboration and competition. The Lake Victoria littoral was an epicenter of both significant mortality and important research before WWI. This article explores the intellectual implications of colonial connectivity at local scale, focusing on changing ideas about sleeping sickness, the communication of research strategies and methods, and the circumstances of life and research in this imperial hinterland and colonial borderland in eastern Africa. Exploring research dynamics around Lake Victoria illuminates the inadequacies of colonial scientific and medical capabilities and both the generative and limiting aspects that the contingencies of colonial research created.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
锥虫病、热带医学和维多利亚湖殖民地间研究的实践,1902-07
当昏睡病于1900年在非洲流行时,它刺激了殖民地医务人员和欧洲科学家之间的竞赛,以发现其致病病原体,传播方式,以及理想的治疗方法。科学家们在欧洲的研究中心和非洲的关键研究地点之间流动,相互监督彼此的进展,并经常保持着合作和竞争的长期关系。第一次世界大战之前,维多利亚湖沿岸是死亡率和重要研究的中心。本文探讨了当地范围内殖民地连通性的知识内涵,重点关注昏睡病观念的变化、研究策略和方法的交流,以及在这个帝国腹地和东非殖民地边境地区的生活和研究环境。探索维多利亚湖周围的研究动态,揭示了殖民地科学和医学能力的不足,以及殖民地研究的偶然性所创造的生成和限制方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: History and Technology serves as an international forum for research on technology in history. A guiding premise is that technology—as knowledge, practice, and material resource—has been a key site for constituting the human experience. In the modern era, it becomes central to our understanding of the making and transformation of societies and cultures, on a local or transnational scale. The journal welcomes historical contributions on any aspect of technology but encourages research that addresses this wider frame through commensurate analytic and critical approaches.
期刊最新文献
Hegemony, co-production and the American Empire: essays in honor of John Krige About the Cover Striking the empire back: Dr. Strangelove and the global histories of technology Botanical surveying, nation-building and American empire: the US quest for a Philippine flora, 1903–1925 Swimming with the coelacanth: the UK and export controls of technology and knowledge in the Cold War
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1