How to Decide about Robotic Surgery in Patients with Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer?

B. Cristea
{"title":"How to Decide about Robotic Surgery in Patients with Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer?","authors":"B. Cristea","doi":"10.19080/ctoij.2019.15.555901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Surgery is the cornerstone in the treatment of gastric cancer and includes conventional open gastrectomy and minimally invasive techniques. Preoperative criteria should be established in order to decrease the rate of conversion to open surgery. To evaluate such criteria, we must focus on computer tomography and upper endoscopy workup. Methods: This is a hospital-based observational retrospective study including 205 patients treated in Fundeni Clinical Institute, during the interval of 2008-2014. The patients were diagnosed with advanced gastric cancer according to endoscopic, computer-tomographic and histopathologic techniques. None of the patients received any neoadjuvant chemotherapy. 144 of patients underwent a curative surgical resection with D2 lymphadenectomy. Results: Minimally invasive surgery was performed on 51 patients; other 26 patients were initially treated by MIS but during operation they were converted to open surgery. Open surgery was performed on 128 patients. Risk factors that led to converting an initially MIS intervention to open intervention comprise: Borrmann 1 (p=0.0275) identified by endoscopy, metastasis (p=0.0416), peritoneal carcinomatosis (p=0.0156) identified by CT scan. On the contrary, endoscopic staging Borrmann 3 proved to be a preventing factor against surgical conversion (p=0.0169). Conclusion: A multivariate analysis of all prospective clinical, endoscopic and tomographic parameters is required to identify the patients with gastric cancer that could benefit more from the robotic platform. Endoscopic parameters as the distance from cardia, distance to pylorus, the invasion of more than one gastric wall, the invasion of both vertical and horizontal portion, might constitute criteria for the selection of surgical methods.","PeriodicalId":9575,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Therapy & Oncology International Journal","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Therapy & Oncology International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19080/ctoij.2019.15.555901","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Surgery is the cornerstone in the treatment of gastric cancer and includes conventional open gastrectomy and minimally invasive techniques. Preoperative criteria should be established in order to decrease the rate of conversion to open surgery. To evaluate such criteria, we must focus on computer tomography and upper endoscopy workup. Methods: This is a hospital-based observational retrospective study including 205 patients treated in Fundeni Clinical Institute, during the interval of 2008-2014. The patients were diagnosed with advanced gastric cancer according to endoscopic, computer-tomographic and histopathologic techniques. None of the patients received any neoadjuvant chemotherapy. 144 of patients underwent a curative surgical resection with D2 lymphadenectomy. Results: Minimally invasive surgery was performed on 51 patients; other 26 patients were initially treated by MIS but during operation they were converted to open surgery. Open surgery was performed on 128 patients. Risk factors that led to converting an initially MIS intervention to open intervention comprise: Borrmann 1 (p=0.0275) identified by endoscopy, metastasis (p=0.0416), peritoneal carcinomatosis (p=0.0156) identified by CT scan. On the contrary, endoscopic staging Borrmann 3 proved to be a preventing factor against surgical conversion (p=0.0169). Conclusion: A multivariate analysis of all prospective clinical, endoscopic and tomographic parameters is required to identify the patients with gastric cancer that could benefit more from the robotic platform. Endoscopic parameters as the distance from cardia, distance to pylorus, the invasion of more than one gastric wall, the invasion of both vertical and horizontal portion, might constitute criteria for the selection of surgical methods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
局部进展期胃癌患者如何选择机器人手术?
目的:手术是胃癌治疗的基石,包括传统的开放式胃切除术和微创技术。术前应建立标准,以减少转换为开放手术的比率。为了评估这些标准,我们必须关注计算机断层扫描和上颌内窥镜检查。方法:这是一项以医院为基础的观察性回顾性研究,包括2008-2014年期间在Fundeni临床研究所治疗的205例患者。经内镜、计算机断层扫描及组织病理学检查均诊断为晚期胃癌。所有患者均未接受任何新辅助化疗。144例患者行根治性D2淋巴结切除术。结果:51例患者行微创手术;其他26例患者最初接受MIS治疗,但在手术期间转为开放手术。128例患者行开放手术。导致最初MIS干预转为开放式干预的危险因素包括:内窥镜发现的Borrmann 1 (p=0.0275),转移(p=0.0416), CT扫描发现的腹膜癌(p=0.0156)。相反,内镜分期Borrmann 3被证明是阻止手术转化的因素(p=0.0169)。结论:需要对所有前瞻性临床、内镜和断层扫描参数进行多变量分析,以确定可以从机器人平台中获益更多的胃癌患者。内镜参数如离贲门的距离、到幽门的距离、侵犯一处以上胃壁、侵犯垂直部分和水平部分均可作为选择手术方法的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Efficient Breast Cancer Detection Using Jelly Electrophorus Optimization Based Deep 3D Convolution Neural Networks (CNN) Stomach Cancer – Prevention with a Plant-Based Diet Rare Case of Synchronous Malignancy in Oral Cavity and Esophagus- Case Report AST/ALT (De ritis) Ratio As a Prognostic Factor in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Skeletal Muscle Metastases in Carcinoma Hypo Pharynx – a Rare Occurrence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1