[A cognitive function test utilizing eye tracking technology in virtual reality].

Katsuyoshi Mizukami, Masatomo Taguchi, Takashi Kouketsu, Naoki Sato, Yoshiro Tanaka, Masahiko Iwakiri, Yoichiro Nishina, Iakov Chernyak, Shintaro Karaki
{"title":"[A cognitive function test utilizing eye tracking technology in virtual reality].","authors":"Katsuyoshi Mizukami,&nbsp;Masatomo Taguchi,&nbsp;Takashi Kouketsu,&nbsp;Naoki Sato,&nbsp;Yoshiro Tanaka,&nbsp;Masahiko Iwakiri,&nbsp;Yoichiro Nishina,&nbsp;Iakov Chernyak,&nbsp;Shintaro Karaki","doi":"10.3143/geriatrics.60.43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>There is a need for a cognitive function test that is less burdensome to perform cognitive function tests used to date and can detect mild changes in the cognitive function and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). We developed a cognitive function examination using a virtual reality device (VR-E). The purpose of this study was to verify its usability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-seven participants (29 males and 48 females, average age 75.1 years old) were classified according to their Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR). To estimate the validity of VR-E in measuring cognitive function, we used the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Japanese version (MoCA-J) scores as benchmarks. The MMSE was performed for all subjects, while the MoCA-J was performed for subjects with an MMSE score ≥20.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VR-E scores were highest in the CDR 0 group (0.77±0.15, mean±SD), decreasing for subsequent groups (CDR 0.5: 0.65±0.19, CDR 1-3: 0.22±0.21). The receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that all three methods were able to distinguish CDR groups. For CDR 0 vs. 0.5, the areas under the curve for MMSE/MoCA-J/VR-E were 0.85/0.80/0.70, respectively, and those for CDR 0.5 vs. 1-3 were 0.89/0.92/0.90, respectively. The time required to complete VR-E was approximately 5 minutes. Of the 77 subjects, 12 were difficult to assess using the VR-E due to poor understanding or eye diseases or Meniere's syndrome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present findings suggested that the VR-E can be used as a cognitive function test that correlates with existing standard assessments for dementia and MCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":35593,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Geriatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3143/geriatrics.60.43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: There is a need for a cognitive function test that is less burdensome to perform cognitive function tests used to date and can detect mild changes in the cognitive function and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). We developed a cognitive function examination using a virtual reality device (VR-E). The purpose of this study was to verify its usability.

Methods: Seventy-seven participants (29 males and 48 females, average age 75.1 years old) were classified according to their Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR). To estimate the validity of VR-E in measuring cognitive function, we used the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Japanese version (MoCA-J) scores as benchmarks. The MMSE was performed for all subjects, while the MoCA-J was performed for subjects with an MMSE score ≥20.

Results: VR-E scores were highest in the CDR 0 group (0.77±0.15, mean±SD), decreasing for subsequent groups (CDR 0.5: 0.65±0.19, CDR 1-3: 0.22±0.21). The receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that all three methods were able to distinguish CDR groups. For CDR 0 vs. 0.5, the areas under the curve for MMSE/MoCA-J/VR-E were 0.85/0.80/0.70, respectively, and those for CDR 0.5 vs. 1-3 were 0.89/0.92/0.90, respectively. The time required to complete VR-E was approximately 5 minutes. Of the 77 subjects, 12 were difficult to assess using the VR-E due to poor understanding or eye diseases or Meniere's syndrome.

Conclusions: The present findings suggested that the VR-E can be used as a cognitive function test that correlates with existing standard assessments for dementia and MCI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[在虚拟现实中使用眼动追踪技术的认知功能测试]。
目的:需要一种认知功能测试,这种测试负担较轻,可以检测到认知功能的轻微变化和轻度认知障碍(MCI)。我们开发了一种使用虚拟现实设备(VR-E)的认知功能检查。本研究的目的是验证其可用性。方法:根据临床痴呆评分(CDR)对77例患者进行分类,其中男性29例,女性48例,平均年龄75.1岁。为了评估VR-E在测量认知功能方面的有效性,我们使用了迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)和蒙特利尔认知评估-日本版(MoCA-J)分数作为基准。所有受试者均进行MMSE测试,MMSE评分≥20的受试者进行MoCA-J测试。结果:VR-E评分以CDR 0组最高(0.77±0.15,mean±SD),随后各组依次下降(CDR 0.5: 0.65±0.19,CDR 1-3: 0.22±0.21)。受试者工作特征分析表明,三种方法均能区分CDR组。CDR 0 vs. 0.5时,MMSE/MoCA-J/VR-E曲线下面积分别为0.85/0.80/0.70,CDR 0.5 vs. 1-3时曲线下面积分别为0.89/0.92/0.90。完成VR-E所需的时间约为5分钟。在77名受试者中,12名由于视力不佳或眼病或梅尼埃综合征而难以使用VR-E进行评估。结论:目前的研究结果表明,VR-E可以作为一种认知功能测试,与痴呆和MCI的现有标准评估相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Japanese Journal of Geriatrics
Japanese Journal of Geriatrics Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
期刊最新文献
[Postnatal epigenome-mediated aging control and global trends]. [Outline of blood base biomarkers]. [Association between working in small-scale cultivated land as a daily-life task and the physical and cognitive functions among elderly people in hilly and mountainous areas]. [Table of Contents].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1