Exercise-Induced Increase in Baroreflex Sensitivity Predicts Improved Prognosis After Myocardial Infarction

M. L. La Rovere, C. Bersano, M. Gnemmi, G. Specchia, P. Schwartz
{"title":"Exercise-Induced Increase in Baroreflex Sensitivity Predicts Improved Prognosis After Myocardial Infarction","authors":"M. L. La Rovere, C. Bersano, M. Gnemmi, G. Specchia, P. Schwartz","doi":"10.1161/01.CIR.0000027565.12764.E1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background—Despite the rational expectation for a survival benefit produced by exercise training among post–myocardial infarction (MI) patients, direct evidence remains elusive. Clinically, changes in autonomic balance toward lower vagal activity have consistently been associated with increased mortality risk; conversely, among both control and post-MI dogs, exercise training improved vagal reflexes and prevented sudden death. Accordingly, we tested the hypothesis that exercise training, if accompanied by a shift toward increased vagal activity of an autonomic marker such as baroreflex sensitivity (BRS), could reduce mortality in post-MI patients. Methods and Results—Ninety-five consecutive male patients surviving a first uncomplicated MI were randomly assigned to a 4-week endurance training period or to no training. Age (51±8 versus 52±8 years), site of MI (anterior 41% versus 43%), left ventricular ejection fraction (52±13 versus 51±14%), and BRS (7.9±5.4 versus 7.9±3.4 ms/mm Hg) did not differ between the two groups. After 4 weeks, BRS improved by 26% (P =0.04) in trained patients, whereas it did not change in nontrained patients. During a 10-year follow-up, cardiac mortality among the 16 trained patients who had an exercise-induced increase in BRS ≥3 ms/mm Hg (responders) was strikingly lower compared with that of the trained patients without such a BRS increase (nonresponders) and that of the nontrained patients (0 of 16 versus 18 of 79 [23%], P =0.04). Cardiac mortality was also lower among responders irrespective of training (4% versus 24%, P =0.04). Conclusions—Post-MI exercise training can favorably modify long-term survival, provided that it is associated with a clear shift of the autonomic balance toward an increase in vagal activity.","PeriodicalId":10194,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":"15 1","pages":"945-949"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"330","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000027565.12764.E1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 330

Abstract

Background—Despite the rational expectation for a survival benefit produced by exercise training among post–myocardial infarction (MI) patients, direct evidence remains elusive. Clinically, changes in autonomic balance toward lower vagal activity have consistently been associated with increased mortality risk; conversely, among both control and post-MI dogs, exercise training improved vagal reflexes and prevented sudden death. Accordingly, we tested the hypothesis that exercise training, if accompanied by a shift toward increased vagal activity of an autonomic marker such as baroreflex sensitivity (BRS), could reduce mortality in post-MI patients. Methods and Results—Ninety-five consecutive male patients surviving a first uncomplicated MI were randomly assigned to a 4-week endurance training period or to no training. Age (51±8 versus 52±8 years), site of MI (anterior 41% versus 43%), left ventricular ejection fraction (52±13 versus 51±14%), and BRS (7.9±5.4 versus 7.9±3.4 ms/mm Hg) did not differ between the two groups. After 4 weeks, BRS improved by 26% (P =0.04) in trained patients, whereas it did not change in nontrained patients. During a 10-year follow-up, cardiac mortality among the 16 trained patients who had an exercise-induced increase in BRS ≥3 ms/mm Hg (responders) was strikingly lower compared with that of the trained patients without such a BRS increase (nonresponders) and that of the nontrained patients (0 of 16 versus 18 of 79 [23%], P =0.04). Cardiac mortality was also lower among responders irrespective of training (4% versus 24%, P =0.04). Conclusions—Post-MI exercise training can favorably modify long-term survival, provided that it is associated with a clear shift of the autonomic balance toward an increase in vagal activity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运动诱导的压力反射敏感性的增加预示心肌梗死后预后的改善
背景:尽管人们对心肌梗死后(MI)患者运动训练能提高生存率有合理的预期,但直接证据仍然难以捉摸。临床上,迷走神经活动降低导致的自主神经平衡改变一直与死亡风险增加有关;相反,在对照组和心肌梗死后的狗中,运动训练改善了迷走神经反射并防止了猝死。因此,我们测试了这样的假设,即运动训练,如果伴随着自主神经标志物(如压力反射敏感性(BRS))迷走神经活动的增加,可以降低心肌梗死后患者的死亡率。方法和结果:95例首次无并发症心肌梗死的男性患者连续存活,随机分为4周耐力训练组和无耐力训练组。两组患者的年龄(51±8岁对52±8岁)、心肌梗死部位(前侧41%对43%)、左室射血分数(52±13对51±14%)和BRS(7.9±5.4对7.9±3.4 ms/mm Hg)均无差异。4周后,训练患者的BRS改善了26% (P =0.04),而未训练患者的BRS没有变化。在10年的随访中,16名运动引起的BRS升高≥3 ms/mm Hg(反应者)的训练患者的心脏死亡率明显低于没有BRS升高的训练患者(无反应者)和未训练的患者(16人中的0人对79人中的18人[23%],P =0.04)。与训练无关,反应者的心脏死亡率也较低(4%对24%,P =0.04)。结论:心肌梗死后的运动训练可以改善长期生存,前提是它与自主神经平衡向迷走神经活动增加的明显转变有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abstracts 4th Scientific Forum on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research in Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke Heat Shock Protein 72 Enhances Manganese Superoxide Dismutase Activity During Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury, Associated With Mitochondrial Protection and Apoptosis Reduction Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling After Surgical Therapy for Aortic Stenosis: Correlation to Renin-Angiotensin System Gene Expression Circulatory Assistance With a Permanent Implantable IABP: Initial Human Experience Keratinocyte Growth Factor Enhances Post-Pneumonectomy Lung Growth by Alveolar Proliferation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1