Supply chain stakeholder pressure for the adoption of sustainable supply chain practices: examining the roles of entrepreneurial and sustainability orientations

Natalia G. Vidal, Wellington Spetic, S. Croom, D. Marshall
{"title":"Supply chain stakeholder pressure for the adoption of sustainable supply chain practices: examining the roles of entrepreneurial and sustainability orientations","authors":"Natalia G. Vidal, Wellington Spetic, S. Croom, D. Marshall","doi":"10.1108/scm-08-2021-0370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study examines the relationship between supply chain stakeholder pressure from customers and suppliers for the adoption of social and environmental sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) practices given the simultaneous conditional effects of both entrepreneurial orientation (EO) and sustainability orientation (SO).\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe authors conducted a survey of US firms focused on their relationship with their top supplier or buyer by spend. This study used conditional process analysis to measure the relationship between stakeholder pressure and adoption of SSCM practices as well as the double moderation effects of EO and SO on this relationship.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results show that both EO and SO simultaneously function as moderators of the effect of supply chain stakeholder pressure on the adoption of social and environmental SSCM practices. However, EO will only get firms so far in the adoption of SSCM practices. Once a strong SO takes effect, higher practice adoption ensues but the effect of stakeholder pressure weakens.\n\n\nPractical implications\nFor those firms that have lower levels of SO, EO and supply chain stakeholder pressure are still essential drivers for the adoption of SSCM practice. The results of this study suggest that focal firms should work closely with suppliers to increase their levels of SO while also maintaining pressure for the adoption of SSCM practices.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study shows the concurrent effect of two organizational level drivers on the adoption of SSCM practices, indicating that efforts in developing a strong SO are more likely to prepare firms for the adoption of SSCM practices.\n","PeriodicalId":43857,"journal":{"name":"Operations and Supply Chain Management-An International Journal","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operations and Supply Chain Management-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-08-2021-0370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose This study examines the relationship between supply chain stakeholder pressure from customers and suppliers for the adoption of social and environmental sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) practices given the simultaneous conditional effects of both entrepreneurial orientation (EO) and sustainability orientation (SO). Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted a survey of US firms focused on their relationship with their top supplier or buyer by spend. This study used conditional process analysis to measure the relationship between stakeholder pressure and adoption of SSCM practices as well as the double moderation effects of EO and SO on this relationship. Findings The results show that both EO and SO simultaneously function as moderators of the effect of supply chain stakeholder pressure on the adoption of social and environmental SSCM practices. However, EO will only get firms so far in the adoption of SSCM practices. Once a strong SO takes effect, higher practice adoption ensues but the effect of stakeholder pressure weakens. Practical implications For those firms that have lower levels of SO, EO and supply chain stakeholder pressure are still essential drivers for the adoption of SSCM practice. The results of this study suggest that focal firms should work closely with suppliers to increase their levels of SO while also maintaining pressure for the adoption of SSCM practices. Originality/value This study shows the concurrent effect of two organizational level drivers on the adoption of SSCM practices, indicating that efforts in developing a strong SO are more likely to prepare firms for the adoption of SSCM practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
供应链利益相关者对采用可持续供应链实践的压力:考察创业和可持续发展方向的作用
目的本研究考察了在创业导向(EO)和可持续导向(SO)的同时条件效应下,来自客户和供应商的供应链利益相关者压力对采用社会和环境可持续供应链管理(SSCM)实践的影响。设计/方法/方法作者对美国公司进行了一项调查,重点关注他们与按支出计算的最大供应商或买家的关系。本研究采用条件过程分析的方法来衡量利益相关者压力与企业实施SSCM实践之间的关系,以及EO和SO对这种关系的双重调节作用。研究结果表明,在供应链利益相关者压力对企业采用社会和环境SSCM实践的影响中,EO和SO同时起到调节作用。然而,在采用SSCM实践方面,EO只能让公司到目前为止。一旦强大的SO起作用,更高的实践采用率就会随之而来,而利益相关者压力的作用会减弱。对于那些SO、EO和供应链利益相关者压力水平较低的公司来说,采用SSCM实践仍然是必不可少的驱动因素。本研究的结果表明,重点企业应与供应商密切合作,以提高他们的SO水平,同时也保持采用SSCM实践的压力。原创性/价值本研究显示了两个组织层面驱动因素对采用SSCM实践的同时影响,表明开发强大的SO的努力更有可能使公司为采用SSCM实践做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
27.80%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
A Study of Different Croston-Like Forecasting Methods Evolution of Performance Measurement Research: An Update on Research Development from 2005 to 2020 and Future Outlook for the Field Can the supply chain management field be more critical? Building new bridges with critical management studies On the Effectiveness of Option Contracts under Supply Disruption From Wireframe to Dashboard – Creating Transparency in Supply Chain Networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1