Early passive mobilization increases vascular reactivity response in critical patients with sepsis: a quasi-experimental study.

Q2 Medicine Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-03 DOI:10.5935/0103-507X.20220132-pt
Tamara Rodrigues da Silva Destro, Thaís Marina Pires de Campos Biazon, Henrique Pott-Junior, Flávia Cristina Rossi Caruso, Daniela Kuguimoto Andaku, Naiara Molina Garcia, José Carlos Bonjorno-Junior, Audrey Borghi-Silva, Débora Mayumi de Oliveira Kawakami, Viviane Castello-Simões, Renata Gonçalves Mendes
{"title":"Early passive mobilization increases vascular reactivity response in critical patients with sepsis: a quasi-experimental study.","authors":"Tamara Rodrigues da Silva Destro, Thaís Marina Pires de Campos Biazon, Henrique Pott-Junior, Flávia Cristina Rossi Caruso, Daniela Kuguimoto Andaku, Naiara Molina Garcia, José Carlos Bonjorno-Junior, Audrey Borghi-Silva, Débora Mayumi de Oliveira Kawakami, Viviane Castello-Simões, Renata Gonçalves Mendes","doi":"10.5935/0103-507X.20220132-pt","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the influence of a passive mobilization session on endothelial function in patients with sepsis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a quasi-experimental double-blind and single-arm study with a pre- and postintervention design. Twenty-five patients with a diagnosis of sepsis who were hospitalized in the intensive care unit were included. Endothelial function was assessed at baseline (preintervention) and immediately postintervention by brachial artery ultrasonography. Flow mediated dilatation, peak blood flow velocity and peak shear rate were obtained. Passive mobilization consisted of bilateral mobilization (ankles, knees, hips, wrists, elbows and shoulders), with three sets of ten repetitions each, totaling 15 minutes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After mobilization, we found increased vascular reactivity function compared to preintervention: absolute flow-mediated dilatation (0.57mm ± 0.22 versus 0.17mm ± 0.31; p < 0.001) and relative flow-mediated dilatation (17.1% ± 8.25 versus 5.08% ± 9.16; p < 0.001). Reactive hyperemia peak flow (71.8cm/s ± 29.3 versus 95.3cm/s ± 32.2; p < 0.001) and shear rate (211s ± 113 versus 288s ± 144; p < 0.001) were also increased.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A passive mobilization session increases endothelial function in critical patients with sepsis. Future studies should investigate whether a mobilization program can be applied as a beneficial intervention for clinical improvement of endothelial function in patients hospitalized due to sepsis.</p>","PeriodicalId":53519,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva","volume":"34 4","pages":"461-468"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9987000/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/0103-507X.20220132-pt","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the influence of a passive mobilization session on endothelial function in patients with sepsis.

Methods: This was a quasi-experimental double-blind and single-arm study with a pre- and postintervention design. Twenty-five patients with a diagnosis of sepsis who were hospitalized in the intensive care unit were included. Endothelial function was assessed at baseline (preintervention) and immediately postintervention by brachial artery ultrasonography. Flow mediated dilatation, peak blood flow velocity and peak shear rate were obtained. Passive mobilization consisted of bilateral mobilization (ankles, knees, hips, wrists, elbows and shoulders), with three sets of ten repetitions each, totaling 15 minutes.

Results: After mobilization, we found increased vascular reactivity function compared to preintervention: absolute flow-mediated dilatation (0.57mm ± 0.22 versus 0.17mm ± 0.31; p < 0.001) and relative flow-mediated dilatation (17.1% ± 8.25 versus 5.08% ± 9.16; p < 0.001). Reactive hyperemia peak flow (71.8cm/s ± 29.3 versus 95.3cm/s ± 32.2; p < 0.001) and shear rate (211s ± 113 versus 288s ± 144; p < 0.001) were also increased.

Conclusion: A passive mobilization session increases endothelial function in critical patients with sepsis. Future studies should investigate whether a mobilization program can be applied as a beneficial intervention for clinical improvement of endothelial function in patients hospitalized due to sepsis.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期被动动员可增加脓毒症危重患者的血管反应性反应:一项准实验研究。
目的:研究被动运动对脓毒症患者内皮功能的影响:研究被动运动对脓毒症患者血管内皮功能的影响:这是一项采用干预前后设计的准实验性双盲单臂研究。研究纳入了 25 名被诊断为败血症并在重症监护室住院的患者。在基线(干预前)和干预后立即通过肱动脉超声波检查评估内皮功能。结果包括血流介导的扩张、峰值血流速度和峰值剪切率。被动动员包括双侧动员(脚踝、膝盖、臀部、手腕、肘部和肩膀),共三组,每组重复 10 次,共 15 分钟:动员后,我们发现血管反应功能与干预前相比有所增加:绝对血流介导的扩张(0.57 毫米 ± 0.22 对 0.17 毫米 ± 0.31;P < 0.001)和相对血流介导的扩张(17.1% ± 8.25 对 5.08% ± 9.16;P < 0.001)。反应性充血峰值流量(71.8cm/s ± 29.3 对 95.3cm/s ± 32.2;p < 0.001)和剪切率(211s ± 113 对 288s ± 144;p < 0.001)也有所增加:结论:被动动员可增强脓毒症危重患者的内皮功能。今后的研究应探讨是否可以将被动运动计划作为一种有益的干预措施,用于临床改善因脓毒症住院的患者的内皮功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Patient-level costs of central line-associated bloodstream infections caused by multidrug-resistant microorganisms in a public intensive care unit in Brazil: a retrospective cohort study Critical COVID-19 and neurological dysfunction - a direct comparative analysis between SARS-CoV-2 and other infectious pathogens. Reply to: Epistaxis as a complication of high-flow nasal cannula therapy in adults. Robust, maintainable, emergency invasive mechanical ventilator. Erratum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1