Refusal of beds and triage of patients admitted to intensive care units in Brazil: a cross-sectional national survey.

Rafaela de Lemos Lepre, Ana Luiza Mezzaroba, Lucienne Tibery Queiroz Cardoso, Tiemi Matsuo, Cíntia Magalhães Carvalho Grion
{"title":"Refusal of beds and triage of patients admitted to intensive care units in Brazil: a cross-sectional national survey.","authors":"Rafaela de Lemos Lepre,&nbsp;Ana Luiza Mezzaroba,&nbsp;Lucienne Tibery Queiroz Cardoso,&nbsp;Tiemi Matsuo,&nbsp;Cíntia Magalhães Carvalho Grion","doi":"10.5935/0103-507X.20220264-pt","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To obtain data on bed refusal in intensive care units in Brazil and to evaluate the use of triage systems by professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey. Using the Delphi methodology, a questionnaire was created contemplating the objectives of the study. Physicians and nurses enrolled in the research network of the Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira (AMIBnet) were invited to participate. A web platform (SurveyMonkey®) was used to distribute the questionnaire. The variables in this study were measured in categories and expressed as proportions. The chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used to verify associations. The significance level was set at 5%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 231 professionals answered the questionnaire, representing all regions of the country. The national intensive care units had an occupancy rate of more than 90% always or frequently for 90.8% of the participants. Among the participants, 84.4% had already refused admitting patients to the intensive care unit due to the capacity of the unit. Half of the Brazilian institutions (49.7%) did not have triage protocols for admission to intensive beds.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bed refusal due to high occupancy rates is common in Brazilian intensive care units. Even so, half of the services in Brazil do not adopt protocols for triage of beds.</p>","PeriodicalId":53519,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva","volume":"34 4","pages":"484-491"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9987007/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/0103-507X.20220264-pt","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To obtain data on bed refusal in intensive care units in Brazil and to evaluate the use of triage systems by professionals.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey. Using the Delphi methodology, a questionnaire was created contemplating the objectives of the study. Physicians and nurses enrolled in the research network of the Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira (AMIBnet) were invited to participate. A web platform (SurveyMonkey®) was used to distribute the questionnaire. The variables in this study were measured in categories and expressed as proportions. The chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used to verify associations. The significance level was set at 5%.

Results: In total, 231 professionals answered the questionnaire, representing all regions of the country. The national intensive care units had an occupancy rate of more than 90% always or frequently for 90.8% of the participants. Among the participants, 84.4% had already refused admitting patients to the intensive care unit due to the capacity of the unit. Half of the Brazilian institutions (49.7%) did not have triage protocols for admission to intensive beds.

Conclusions: Bed refusal due to high occupancy rates is common in Brazilian intensive care units. Even so, half of the services in Brazil do not adopt protocols for triage of beds.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西重症监护病房患者拒绝床位和分诊:一项横断面全国调查。
目的:获取巴西重症监护病房拒绝床位的数据,并评估专业人员对分诊系统的使用情况。方法:横断面调查。使用德尔菲法,设计了一份调查问卷,考虑了研究的目标。邀请参加巴西密集医学协会(AMIBnet)研究网络的医生和护士参加。使用网络平台(SurveyMonkey®)分发问卷。本研究的变量以类别计量,并以比例表示。使用卡方检验或费雪精确检验来验证关联。显著性水平设为5%。结果:共有231名专业人士回答了问卷,代表了全国所有地区。90.8%的参与者经常或经常入住国家重症监护病房的比例超过90%。在参与者中,84.4%的人已经因为重症监护室的容量而拒绝接收病人。一半的巴西机构(49.7%)没有重症病床的收治分诊方案。结论:在巴西重症监护病房,由于高入住率而导致的床位拒绝是很常见的。即便如此,巴西仍有一半的医疗服务机构没有采用病床分诊协议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Patient-level costs of central line-associated bloodstream infections caused by multidrug-resistant microorganisms in a public intensive care unit in Brazil: a retrospective cohort study Critical COVID-19 and neurological dysfunction - a direct comparative analysis between SARS-CoV-2 and other infectious pathogens. Reply to: Epistaxis as a complication of high-flow nasal cannula therapy in adults. Robust, maintainable, emergency invasive mechanical ventilator. Erratum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1