A General Equilibrium Approach to Taxonomy of Institutional Proxies for Innovation Outcomes

Oghenovo A. Obrimah
{"title":"A General Equilibrium Approach to Taxonomy of Institutional Proxies for Innovation Outcomes","authors":"Oghenovo A. Obrimah","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3581880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study develops a new formal theoretical rubric for ranking of proxies for institutional factors that, conceptually, have taxonomy of either of facilitators of, or constraints on economic development. Illustrative implementations of the formal theoretical rubric reveal that spending on each of elementary or secondary education has taxonomy, not of social capital, but of `Productive Capability'. Conditional on optimal spending on primary and secondary education, stock markets are beneficial for welfare of individuals, and are shown to have taxonomy, not of investment capability, but of `Innovation Capability'. An hitherto unexplored factor shown to rank high as facilitator of economic development is `Policy Capability' that incentivizes export orientation within a domestic economy. Alongside spending on education, and stock market size, this policy capability is shown to be more important for realization of economic development than the stock of physical capital within an economy. All rank preferences are shown to satisfy the Strong Axiom of Revealed Preference (SARP). Empirical tests reveal importance of availability and application of formal theoretical rubrics to characterization and interpretation of effects of institutional factors that, conceptually, have taxonomy of facilitators of, or constraints on economic development.","PeriodicalId":13677,"journal":{"name":"Institutions & Transition Economics: Microeconomic Issues eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Institutions & Transition Economics: Microeconomic Issues eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3581880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This study develops a new formal theoretical rubric for ranking of proxies for institutional factors that, conceptually, have taxonomy of either of facilitators of, or constraints on economic development. Illustrative implementations of the formal theoretical rubric reveal that spending on each of elementary or secondary education has taxonomy, not of social capital, but of `Productive Capability'. Conditional on optimal spending on primary and secondary education, stock markets are beneficial for welfare of individuals, and are shown to have taxonomy, not of investment capability, but of `Innovation Capability'. An hitherto unexplored factor shown to rank high as facilitator of economic development is `Policy Capability' that incentivizes export orientation within a domestic economy. Alongside spending on education, and stock market size, this policy capability is shown to be more important for realization of economic development than the stock of physical capital within an economy. All rank preferences are shown to satisfy the Strong Axiom of Revealed Preference (SARP). Empirical tests reveal importance of availability and application of formal theoretical rubrics to characterization and interpretation of effects of institutional factors that, conceptually, have taxonomy of facilitators of, or constraints on economic development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创新成果制度代理分类的一般均衡方法
本研究开发了一种新的正式的理论准则,用于对制度因素的代理进行排序,这些制度因素在概念上具有促进经济发展或制约经济发展的分类学。正式理论标题的说明性实施表明,中小学教育的每一项支出都有分类,不是社会资本,而是“生产能力”。在中小学教育支出最优的条件下,股票市场有利于个人的福利,并被证明具有分类,不是投资能力,而是“创新能力”。迄今为止尚未开发的一个被证明是经济发展促进者的因素是“政策能力”,它在国内经济中激励出口导向。除了教育支出和股票市场规模外,这种政策能力对实现经济发展的作用比经济中实物资本的存量更为重要。所有的等级偏好都满足强显示偏好公理(SARP)。经验检验表明,正式理论准则的可得性和应用对于确定和解释体制因素的影响具有重要意义,这些体制因素在概念上对经济发展的促进因素或制约因素具有分类学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Inter-Firm Patent Litigation and Innovation Competition A Network Theory of Safety Premium Competition and Fatigue Rent Seeking in Blockchain Governance: The Awkward Transition From Market Decision Making to Non-market Decision Making Анализ регулирования налогообложения и учета нематериальных активов как важной составляющей цифровой экономики (Analysis of Tax Regulation and Accounting of Intangible Assets as an Important Component of the Digital Economy)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1