INVESTMENT FUNDS WITH LEGAL PERSONALITY – A TRUE RIVAL TO MUTUAL FUNDS?

Q3 Social Sciences InterEULawEast Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.22598/IELE.2020.7.2.7
Morana Derenčinović Ruk, Mihaela Braut Filipović, Suzana Audić Vuletić
{"title":"INVESTMENT FUNDS WITH LEGAL PERSONALITY – A TRUE RIVAL TO MUTUAL FUNDS?","authors":"Morana Derenčinović Ruk, Mihaela Braut Filipović, Suzana Audić Vuletić","doi":"10.22598/IELE.2020.7.2.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Investment funds come in a large variety of legal forms, investment techniques, target investors, redemption rights, and others. It is often said that there are no two investment funds that are the same. The focus of this article is the legal form in which they come. Authors shall analyze the position of investors in funds with legal personality in order to discuss differences in comparison to investors in mutual funds. On the EU level only the UCITS funds are harmonized, while alternative investment funds are left to national regulations. The aim is to discuss whether the legal status of investment funds is a real yardstick for determining the crucial investor’s rights such as redemption rights and relations between the investors and fund managers. In order to provide answer authors shall compare funds in jurisdictions that are comparable and often serve as role models, as well as those in which the fund industry is most developed, followed by the Croatian perspective. Finally, the authors shall contribute to the discussion of how can traditional types of companies such as joint-stock or limited liability companies be integrated into the capital market law arena, serving as a vessel to investment funds.","PeriodicalId":52280,"journal":{"name":"InterEULawEast","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"InterEULawEast","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22598/IELE.2020.7.2.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Investment funds come in a large variety of legal forms, investment techniques, target investors, redemption rights, and others. It is often said that there are no two investment funds that are the same. The focus of this article is the legal form in which they come. Authors shall analyze the position of investors in funds with legal personality in order to discuss differences in comparison to investors in mutual funds. On the EU level only the UCITS funds are harmonized, while alternative investment funds are left to national regulations. The aim is to discuss whether the legal status of investment funds is a real yardstick for determining the crucial investor’s rights such as redemption rights and relations between the investors and fund managers. In order to provide answer authors shall compare funds in jurisdictions that are comparable and often serve as role models, as well as those in which the fund industry is most developed, followed by the Croatian perspective. Finally, the authors shall contribute to the discussion of how can traditional types of companies such as joint-stock or limited liability companies be integrated into the capital market law arena, serving as a vessel to investment funds.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
具有法人资格的投资基金——共同基金的真正竞争对手?
投资基金的法律形式、投资手法、目标投资者、赎回权等多种多样。人们常说,没有两只投资基金是相同的。本文的重点是它们的法律形式。笔者通过对法人基金投资者地位的分析,探讨其与共同基金投资者的区别。在欧盟层面,只有UCITS基金是统一的,而另类投资基金则由各国监管。其目的是讨论投资基金的法律地位是否是确定赎回权等关键投资者权利以及投资者与基金管理人之间关系的真正标准。为了提供答案,作者应比较辖区内具有可比性并经常作为榜样的基金,以及基金行业最发达的基金,然后是克罗地亚的观点。最后,作者将有助于讨论传统类型的公司,如股份公司或有限责任公司如何融入资本市场法律领域,作为投资基金的载体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
InterEULawEast
InterEULawEast Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
DYNAMIC INDUSTRIES REQUIRE A DYNAMIC APPROACH TO LAW? ON THE ILLUMINAGRAIL TAKEOVER THE DIGITAL ECONOMY AND LEGAL CHALLENGES DIGITAL RIGHTS IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS SYSTEM REMITTANCES ARE THE MAIN INDICATORS OF ECONOMIC GROWTH IN THE WESTERN BALKANS THE IMPACT OF THE ASSOCIATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND UKRAINE ON MUTUAL TRADE AND UKRAINIAN PORTS CARGO
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1