Developing a strategy to improve data sharing in health research: A mixed-methods study to identify barriers and facilitators.

Michelle A Krahe, Malcolm Wolski, Sharon Mickan, Julie Toohey, Paul Scuffham, Sheena Reilly
{"title":"Developing a strategy to improve data sharing in health research: A mixed-methods study to identify barriers and facilitators.","authors":"Michelle A Krahe,&nbsp;Malcolm Wolski,&nbsp;Sharon Mickan,&nbsp;Julie Toohey,&nbsp;Paul Scuffham,&nbsp;Sheena Reilly","doi":"10.1177/1833358320917207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data sharing presents new opportunities across the spectrum of research and is vital for science that is open, where data are easily discoverable, accessible, intelligible, reproducible, replicable and verifiable. Despite this, it is yet to become common practice. Global efforts to develop practical guidance for data sharing and open access initiatives are underway, however evidence-based studies to inform the development and implementation of effective strategies are lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study sought to determine the barriers and facilitators to data sharing among health researchers and to identify the target behaviours for designing a behaviour change intervention strategy.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data were drawn from a cross-sectional survey of data management practices among health researchers from one Australian research institute. Determinants of behaviour were theoretically derived using well-established behavioural models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data sharing practices have been described for 77 researchers, and 6 barriers and 4 facilitators identified. The primary barriers to data sharing included perceived negative consequences and lack of competency to share data. The primary facilitators to data sharing included trust in others using the data and social influence related to public benefit. Intervention functions likely to be most effective at changing target behaviours were also identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results of this study provide a theoretical and evidence-based process to understand the behavioural barriers and facilitators of data sharing among health researchers.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Designing interventions that specifically address target behaviours to promote data sharing are important for open researcher practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":73210,"journal":{"name":"Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia","volume":"52 1","pages":"18-27"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1833358320917207","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1833358320917207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: Data sharing presents new opportunities across the spectrum of research and is vital for science that is open, where data are easily discoverable, accessible, intelligible, reproducible, replicable and verifiable. Despite this, it is yet to become common practice. Global efforts to develop practical guidance for data sharing and open access initiatives are underway, however evidence-based studies to inform the development and implementation of effective strategies are lacking.

Objective: This study sought to determine the barriers and facilitators to data sharing among health researchers and to identify the target behaviours for designing a behaviour change intervention strategy.

Method: Data were drawn from a cross-sectional survey of data management practices among health researchers from one Australian research institute. Determinants of behaviour were theoretically derived using well-established behavioural models.

Results: Data sharing practices have been described for 77 researchers, and 6 barriers and 4 facilitators identified. The primary barriers to data sharing included perceived negative consequences and lack of competency to share data. The primary facilitators to data sharing included trust in others using the data and social influence related to public benefit. Intervention functions likely to be most effective at changing target behaviours were also identified.

Conclusion: Results of this study provide a theoretical and evidence-based process to understand the behavioural barriers and facilitators of data sharing among health researchers.

Implications: Designing interventions that specifically address target behaviours to promote data sharing are important for open researcher practices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制定改进卫生研究数据共享的战略:一项确定障碍和促进因素的混合方法研究。
背景:数据共享为整个研究领域带来了新的机遇,对于开放的科学至关重要,在开放的科学中,数据很容易被发现、获取、理解、再现、可复制和可验证。尽管如此,它还没有成为普遍的做法。为数据共享和开放获取倡议制定实用指南的全球努力正在进行中,但缺乏为制定和实施有效战略提供信息的循证研究。目的:本研究旨在确定卫生研究人员之间数据共享的障碍和促进因素,并确定设计行为改变干预策略的目标行为。方法:数据来自澳大利亚一家研究机构的卫生研究人员数据管理实践的横断面调查。行为的决定因素在理论上是用成熟的行为模型推导出来的。结果:对77名研究人员的数据共享实践进行了描述,并确定了6个障碍和4个促进因素。数据共享的主要障碍包括感知到的负面后果和缺乏共享数据的能力。促进数据共享的主要因素包括对使用数据的他人的信任和与公共利益有关的社会影响。干预功能可能是最有效的改变目标行为也被确定。结论:本研究结果为理解卫生研究人员之间数据共享的行为障碍和促进因素提供了一个理论和循证过程。启示:设计专门针对目标行为的干预措施以促进数据共享对于开放研究实践非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Transition to ICD-11 for admitted patient data reporting: opportunities and challenges. Digital competencies for health service managers and health service implications for Australia. ICD-11 in Canada: Leveraging crosswalks to evaluate adoption, impact and transition strategies. A scientometric review of health data sharing for secondary use: Insights, frontiers and the path ahead. Data professionals in healthcare: Who they are and what they do.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1