A values and psychological attribute analysis of the Scottish Independence Referendum context in Twitter

Caroline A. Halcrow, Qingpeng Zhang
{"title":"A values and psychological attribute analysis of the Scottish Independence Referendum context in Twitter","authors":"Caroline A. Halcrow, Qingpeng Zhang","doi":"10.1145/2786451.2786508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Schwartz (Andrew) [1] argues that inter-disciplinary approaches involving computational linguistics and the social sciences are needed to make sense of big data in social networks. The social psychology tool, the Schwartz (Shalom) Values Model [2] is used here alongside linguistic psychological attribute analysis to investigate a context in 'Twitter'. The topic of the Scottish Independence Referendum (September 18th, 2014) was selected as the context because it divided opinion into camps. This study's main hypothesis is that the camps of contexts can be values-profiled. Secondary hypotheses are: the values profiles correlate with psychological attribute profiles in the different voting camps; and the psychological textual analysis adds a wider psychological dimension to topic modeling in 'Twitter'. The methodology combined two processes: the assignment of values to the camps of the Referendum context using the Schwartz Values Model [2]; and the content analysis of the tweets, using the psychological textual analysis tool, LIWC.","PeriodicalId":93136,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ... ACM Web Science Conference. ACM Web Science Conference","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ... ACM Web Science Conference. ACM Web Science Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2786451.2786508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Schwartz (Andrew) [1] argues that inter-disciplinary approaches involving computational linguistics and the social sciences are needed to make sense of big data in social networks. The social psychology tool, the Schwartz (Shalom) Values Model [2] is used here alongside linguistic psychological attribute analysis to investigate a context in 'Twitter'. The topic of the Scottish Independence Referendum (September 18th, 2014) was selected as the context because it divided opinion into camps. This study's main hypothesis is that the camps of contexts can be values-profiled. Secondary hypotheses are: the values profiles correlate with psychological attribute profiles in the different voting camps; and the psychological textual analysis adds a wider psychological dimension to topic modeling in 'Twitter'. The methodology combined two processes: the assignment of values to the camps of the Referendum context using the Schwartz Values Model [2]; and the content analysis of the tweets, using the psychological textual analysis tool, LIWC.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
推特中苏格兰独立公投语境的价值观与心理属性分析
Schwartz (Andrew)[1]认为,需要使用涉及计算语言学和社会科学的跨学科方法来理解社交网络中的大数据。社会心理学工具Schwartz (Shalom)价值观模型[2]在这里与语言心理属性分析一起使用,以调查“Twitter”中的上下文。选择苏格兰独立公投(2014年9月18日)的主题作为背景,因为它将意见分成了阵营。本研究的主要假设是语境的阵营可以被价值描述。次要假设是:不同投票阵营的价值观特征与心理属性特征相关;心理文本分析为“推特”中的话题建模增加了更广泛的心理维度。该方法结合了两个过程:使用施瓦茨价值观模型[2]将价值观分配给公投背景下的阵营;以及使用心理学文本分析工具LIWC对推文进行内容分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Opinions on Homeopathy for COVID-19 on Twitter. An Initial Study of Depression Detection on Mandarin Textual through BERT Model WebSci '22: 14th ACM Web Science Conference 2022, Barcelona, Spain, June 26 - 29, 2022 WebSci '21: 13th ACM Web Science Conference 2021, Virtual Event, United Kingdom, 21-25 June, 2021, Companion Publication In conversation with Martha Lane Fox and Wendy Hall on the Future of the Internet
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1