Gender Gap in Numeracy and the Role of Marital Status. Evidence from 19th century France

IF 0.7 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS REVUE D ECONOMIE POLITIQUE Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.3917/REDP.301.0051
Faustine Perrin
{"title":"Gender Gap in Numeracy and the Role of Marital Status. Evidence from 19th century France","authors":"Faustine Perrin","doi":"10.3917/REDP.301.0051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evidence of conventional human capital indicators (e.g. literacy, educational attainment, years of schooling) by marital status is rare or inexistent for the period prior to the 20th century. An indicator of human capital frequently used for the pre-1900 period is the age heaping. We employ this method to chart and analyze the heterogeneity and gender-specific differences of cognitive abilities (numeracy) across France in the mid- 19th century by marital status. We find that married women heap significantly less than unmarried women, while single men heap less than married men. We explore the reliability of four hypotheses to explain those differences. We find that married and non-married women’s data are prone to bias and must be used carefully when accounting for basic numeracy skills. Yet, we find a robust correlation between literacy and numeracy. Our findings suggest that married women’s numeracy skills are more closely linked with indicators of human capital, e.g. enrollment rates, than non-married women’s and men’s numeracy skills.","PeriodicalId":44798,"journal":{"name":"REVUE D ECONOMIE POLITIQUE","volume":"47 1","pages":"51-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REVUE D ECONOMIE POLITIQUE","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/REDP.301.0051","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Evidence of conventional human capital indicators (e.g. literacy, educational attainment, years of schooling) by marital status is rare or inexistent for the period prior to the 20th century. An indicator of human capital frequently used for the pre-1900 period is the age heaping. We employ this method to chart and analyze the heterogeneity and gender-specific differences of cognitive abilities (numeracy) across France in the mid- 19th century by marital status. We find that married women heap significantly less than unmarried women, while single men heap less than married men. We explore the reliability of four hypotheses to explain those differences. We find that married and non-married women’s data are prone to bias and must be used carefully when accounting for basic numeracy skills. Yet, we find a robust correlation between literacy and numeracy. Our findings suggest that married women’s numeracy skills are more closely linked with indicators of human capital, e.g. enrollment rates, than non-married women’s and men’s numeracy skills.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计算能力的性别差异与婚姻状况的作用。证据来自19世纪的法国
传统的人力资本指标(如识字率、受教育程度、受教育年限)与婚姻状况有关的证据在20世纪以前很少或根本不存在。1900年以前经常使用的人力资本指标是年龄堆积。我们采用这种方法来绘制和分析19世纪中期法国各地的婚姻状况在认知能力(计算能力)方面的异质性和性别差异。我们发现已婚女性的堆比未婚女性少得多,而单身男性的堆比已婚男性少得多。我们探讨了四个假设的可靠性来解释这些差异。我们发现已婚和未婚女性的数据容易出现偏差,在考虑基本的计算技能时必须谨慎使用。然而,我们发现读写能力和计算能力之间存在很强的相关性。我们的研究结果表明,与未婚女性和男性的计算技能相比,已婚女性的计算技能与入学率等人力资本指标的关系更为密切。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Monetary Policy with Weakened Unions American Protectionism On the Historical Foundation of Women’s Self-Employment in Africa Testing for the Imports-Led Growth and the Growth-Led Imports Hypotheses in Panels for the Small Island World Mehrdad Vahabi, Destructive Coordination, Anfal and Islamic Political Capitalism. New Reading of Contemporary Iran , Palgrave-Macmillan, 2023
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1