Augmented sociomateriality: implications of artificial intelligence for the field of learning technology

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Research in Learning Technology Pub Date : 2022-05-19 DOI:10.25304/rlt.v30.2642
A. Johri
{"title":"Augmented sociomateriality: implications of artificial intelligence for the field of learning technology","authors":"A. Johri","doi":"10.25304/rlt.v30.2642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There has been a conscious effort in the past decade to produce a more theoretical account of the use of technology for learning. At the same time, advances in artificial intelligence (AI) are being rapidly incorporated into learning technologies, significantly changing their affordances for teaching and learning. In this article I address the question of whether introduction of AI and associated features such as machine learning is a novel development from a theoretical perspective, and if so, how? I draw on the existing perspective of sociomateriality for learning and argue that the use of AI is indeed different because AI transforms sociomateriality by allowing materiality to take on characteristics previously associated primarily with a human agent, thereby shifting the nature of the sociomaterial assemblage. In this data and algorithm-driven AI-based sociomateriality, affordances for representation and agency change, thereby modifying representational and relational practices that are essential for cognition. The dualities of data/algorithm, representational/agentic augmentation, and relational/participatory practices act in tandem within this new sociomaterial assemblage. If left unchecked, this new assemblage is prone to perpetuate the biases programmed within the technology itself. Therefore, it is important to take ethical and moral implications of using AI-driven learning technologies into account before their use.","PeriodicalId":46691,"journal":{"name":"Research in Learning Technology","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Learning Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v30.2642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

There has been a conscious effort in the past decade to produce a more theoretical account of the use of technology for learning. At the same time, advances in artificial intelligence (AI) are being rapidly incorporated into learning technologies, significantly changing their affordances for teaching and learning. In this article I address the question of whether introduction of AI and associated features such as machine learning is a novel development from a theoretical perspective, and if so, how? I draw on the existing perspective of sociomateriality for learning and argue that the use of AI is indeed different because AI transforms sociomateriality by allowing materiality to take on characteristics previously associated primarily with a human agent, thereby shifting the nature of the sociomaterial assemblage. In this data and algorithm-driven AI-based sociomateriality, affordances for representation and agency change, thereby modifying representational and relational practices that are essential for cognition. The dualities of data/algorithm, representational/agentic augmentation, and relational/participatory practices act in tandem within this new sociomaterial assemblage. If left unchecked, this new assemblage is prone to perpetuate the biases programmed within the technology itself. Therefore, it is important to take ethical and moral implications of using AI-driven learning technologies into account before their use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
增强的社会物质:人工智能对学习技术领域的影响
在过去的十年里,人们有意识地努力为学习技术的使用提供一个更理论化的解释。与此同时,人工智能(AI)的进步正在迅速融入学习技术,极大地改变了它们对教学和学习的支持。在本文中,我将讨论从理论角度来看,人工智能及其相关功能(如机器学习)的引入是否是一种新的发展,如果是,如何实现?我借鉴了学习的社会物质性的现有观点,并认为人工智能的使用确实是不同的,因为人工智能通过允许物质性具有以前主要与人类代理相关的特征来改变社会物质性,从而改变了社会物质组合的性质。在这种数据和算法驱动的基于人工智能的社会物质性中,表征和代理的能力发生了变化,从而修改了对认知至关重要的表征和关系实践。数据/算法、代表性/代理增强和关系/参与性实践的二元性在这个新的社会材料组合中串联起作用。如果不加以控制,这种新的组合很容易使技术本身编程的偏见永久化。因此,在使用人工智能驱动的学习技术之前,考虑其伦理和道德影响是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Learning Technology
Research in Learning Technology EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Research in Learning Technology: making friends and influencing people The construction of gamer identity in narratives about video game playing and formal education learning experiences The outlook of learning through metaverse technology from the perspective of teachers in the science education Social annotation: what are students’ perceptions and how does social annotation relate to grades? A theoretical framework for digital learning spaces: learning in individual spaces, working groups, communities of interest, and open connections
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1