Usefulness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as a maintenance treatment in patients with major depression

F. Haesebaert, R. Moirand, A. Schott-Pethelaz, J. Brunelin, E. Poulet
{"title":"Usefulness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as a maintenance treatment in patients with major depression","authors":"F. Haesebaert, R. Moirand, A. Schott-Pethelaz, J. Brunelin, E. Poulet","doi":"10.1080/15622975.2016.1255353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives: To investigate the clinical efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), venlafaxine or a combination of both treatments as a maintenance treatment in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Methods: In a three-arm open-label study, 66 patients, including 45 remitters, who responded to rTMS (n = 25), venlafaxine (n = 22), or a combination of both treatments (n = 19) continued to receive the treatment that led to a response as a maintenance treatment over 12 months. Maintenance rTMS was administered twice per week for 1 month, once per week for 2 months, and once every 2 weeks for 9 months. Venlafaxine was maintained at the dose that induced a clinical response (150 or 225 mg/day). Results: After the 12-month follow-up, the rates of remitters (HDRS < 8) were not different between the three groups (χ2 = 1.25; P = .3). The rates of patients who not relapsed (HDRS < 15) were not different between groups (χ2 = 0.33; P = .8): 40.0% in the rTMS group, 45.1% in the venlafaxine group and 36.9% in the combination group. Conclusions: The three maintenance approaches exhibited similar efficacies in relapse prevention and the maintenance of remission in patients with TRD.","PeriodicalId":22963,"journal":{"name":"The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry","volume":"43 1","pages":"74 - 78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15622975.2016.1255353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

Abstract Objectives: To investigate the clinical efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), venlafaxine or a combination of both treatments as a maintenance treatment in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Methods: In a three-arm open-label study, 66 patients, including 45 remitters, who responded to rTMS (n = 25), venlafaxine (n = 22), or a combination of both treatments (n = 19) continued to receive the treatment that led to a response as a maintenance treatment over 12 months. Maintenance rTMS was administered twice per week for 1 month, once per week for 2 months, and once every 2 weeks for 9 months. Venlafaxine was maintained at the dose that induced a clinical response (150 or 225 mg/day). Results: After the 12-month follow-up, the rates of remitters (HDRS < 8) were not different between the three groups (χ2 = 1.25; P = .3). The rates of patients who not relapsed (HDRS < 15) were not different between groups (χ2 = 0.33; P = .8): 40.0% in the rTMS group, 45.1% in the venlafaxine group and 36.9% in the combination group. Conclusions: The three maintenance approaches exhibited similar efficacies in relapse prevention and the maintenance of remission in patients with TRD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重复经颅磁刺激作为重度抑郁症患者维持治疗的有效性
摘要目的:探讨重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)、文拉法辛或两者联合维持治疗难治性抑郁症(TRD)的临床疗效。方法:在一项三组开放标签研究中,66名患者,包括45名缓解者,对rTMS (n = 25)、文拉法辛(n = 22)或两种治疗联合(n = 19)有反应的患者继续接受治疗,并作为维持治疗持续12个月。维持性rTMS每周2次,持续1个月,每周1次,持续2个月,每2周1次,持续9个月。文拉法辛维持在引起临床反应的剂量(150或225 mg/天)。结果:随访12个月后,三组患者缓解率(HDRS < 8)比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2 = 1.25;p = .3)。两组患者未复发率(HDRS < 15)差异无统计学意义(χ2 = 0.33;P = 0.8): rTMS组40.0%,文拉法辛组45.1%,联合用药组36.9%。结论:三种维持方式在TRD患者预防复发和维持缓解方面效果相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The role of the immune system in depersonalization disorder Downregulation of lncRNAs Gomafu, NONMMUT033604.2, and NONMMUT064397.2 in the hippocampus of mice with model of post-traumatic stress disorder Ketamine-induced changes in plasma brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels are associated with the resting-state functional connectivity of the prefrontal cortex Positive association between cerebral grey matter metabolism and dopamine D2/D3 receptor availability in healthy and schizophrenia subjects: An 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose and 18F-fallypride positron emission tomography study Extrapyramidal reactions following treatment with antidepressants: Results of the AMSP multinational drug surveillance programme
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1