{"title":"Reliability interpretation of redundancy on design and seismic behaviour of steel conveyors","authors":"L. Haj Najafi, H. Rajabi","doi":"10.1080/13287982.2023.2176025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study investigates the effect of redundancy incorporation as static indeterminacy and possibility to utilise alternative load paths in design and seismic behaviour of steel truss bridge conveyors by conducting complementary reliability assessments. The results could be supportive in adjusting the degree of indeterminacy, especially for long structures, to convince the design goals. It is conceived that the design approach with lower indeterminacy donates to less structural weight in addition to a bit more fundamental period contributing to less earthquake-induced demands and easily controllable lateral drifts in the end reference points which are very crucial in view of connecting to the adjacent structures. On the other hand, providing more indeterminacy in conveyor design could bring about more ductility, nonlinear displacement and earthquake energy dissipation as well as closer nonlinear behavioural parameters to the amounts recommended by the design code. In reliability assessments by increasing the degree of indeterminacy, the failure probability is reduced which contributes to the design with higher reliability indexes and higher collapse safety margin and it is expected that the incorporation of redundancy effects would be more perceivable by providing models with more redundancy discrepancy.","PeriodicalId":45617,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13287982.2023.2176025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT This study investigates the effect of redundancy incorporation as static indeterminacy and possibility to utilise alternative load paths in design and seismic behaviour of steel truss bridge conveyors by conducting complementary reliability assessments. The results could be supportive in adjusting the degree of indeterminacy, especially for long structures, to convince the design goals. It is conceived that the design approach with lower indeterminacy donates to less structural weight in addition to a bit more fundamental period contributing to less earthquake-induced demands and easily controllable lateral drifts in the end reference points which are very crucial in view of connecting to the adjacent structures. On the other hand, providing more indeterminacy in conveyor design could bring about more ductility, nonlinear displacement and earthquake energy dissipation as well as closer nonlinear behavioural parameters to the amounts recommended by the design code. In reliability assessments by increasing the degree of indeterminacy, the failure probability is reduced which contributes to the design with higher reliability indexes and higher collapse safety margin and it is expected that the incorporation of redundancy effects would be more perceivable by providing models with more redundancy discrepancy.
期刊介绍:
The Australian Journal of Structural Engineering (AJSE) is published under the auspices of the Structural College Board of Engineers Australia. It fulfils part of the Board''s mission for Continuing Professional Development. The journal also offers a means for exchange and interaction of scientific and professional issues and technical developments. The journal is open to members and non-members of Engineers Australia. Original papers on research and development (Technical Papers) and professional matters and achievements (Professional Papers) in all areas relevant to the science, art and practice of structural engineering are considered for possible publication. All papers and technical notes are peer-reviewed. The fundamental criterion for acceptance for publication is the intellectual and professional value of the contribution. Occasionally, papers previously published in essentially the same form elsewhere may be considered for publication. In this case acknowledgement to prior publication must be included in a footnote on page one of the manuscript. These papers are peer-reviewed as new submissions. The length of acceptable contributions typically should not exceed 4,000 to 5,000 word equivalents. Longer manuscripts may be considered at the discretion of the Editor. Technical Notes typically should not exceed about 1,000 word equivalents. Discussions on a Paper or Note published in the AJSE are welcomed. Discussions must address significant matters related to the content of a Paper or Technical Note and may include supplementary and critical comments and questions regarding content.