Evaluating Early Childhood Assessments A Differential Analysis

S. Atkins-Burnett
{"title":"Evaluating Early Childhood Assessments A Differential Analysis","authors":"S. Atkins-Burnett","doi":"10.1002/9780470757703.CH26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assessment is fundamentally a positive process that holds the potential for enhancing teaching and improving learning. This chapter provides an analytical discussion of the field by adhering to the National Education Goals Panel typology that categorizes four uses or roles for assessment in the preschool years: (1) identification, (2) instructional improvement, (3) program evaluation, and (4) accountability. The chapter also describes a number of achievable challenges: identifying children at risk for developmental delay or school failure; obtaining evaluative information from classroom settings that can be used to inform instruction and improve learning; and designing evaluations that reflect the wide range of influences that affect child growth and development.","PeriodicalId":18335,"journal":{"name":"Mathematica Policy Research Reports","volume":"22 1","pages":"532-549"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mathematica Policy Research Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757703.CH26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

Abstract

Assessment is fundamentally a positive process that holds the potential for enhancing teaching and improving learning. This chapter provides an analytical discussion of the field by adhering to the National Education Goals Panel typology that categorizes four uses or roles for assessment in the preschool years: (1) identification, (2) instructional improvement, (3) program evaluation, and (4) accountability. The chapter also describes a number of achievable challenges: identifying children at risk for developmental delay or school failure; obtaining evaluative information from classroom settings that can be used to inform instruction and improve learning; and designing evaluations that reflect the wide range of influences that affect child growth and development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估儿童早期评估:差异分析
评估基本上是一个积极的过程,具有加强教学和改善学习的潜力。本章通过遵循国家教育目标小组的类型学,对该领域进行了分析讨论,该类型学将学前阶段评估的四种用途或角色分类:(1)识别,(2)教学改进,(3)项目评估,(4)问责制。本章还描述了一些可实现的挑战:识别有发育迟缓或学业失败风险的儿童;从课堂环境中获取可用于指导教学和改善学习的评价信息;设计能够反映影响儿童成长和发展的广泛影响因素的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Spotlight on Florida Spotlight on Colorado Spotlight on North Carolina Spotlight on Illinois State Differences in the Vocational Rehabilitation Experiences of Transition-Age Youth with Disabilities (Journal Article)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1