Security and Development, the Two Wins of China's African Strategy: Initial Research into China's Win-Win Strategy's for African Security

Sam Gitlitz
{"title":"Security and Development, the Two Wins of China's African Strategy: Initial Research into China's Win-Win Strategy's for African Security","authors":"Sam Gitlitz","doi":"10.1177/15423166231157435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is lauded as a watershed for stability and African peace by China, while the West cautions their African partners against supposed false promises. Under Xi Jinping, China adopted a “win-win” foreign policy, in which what benefits their partners benefits China and vice versa. Despite these promises, the continent continues to suffer from violence, with the number of armed conflicts continually increasing. At the systemic level, neither the BRI nor the win-win methodology act as bulwarks against either interstate or intrastate conflict, as such the international community must explore the rationale and intentions behind China's renewed involvement in Africa. Through an analysis of Chinese pronouncements and documentation, Chinese and Western academic analysis, and conflict assessment data, the international community can better understand China's views on conflict assessment and prevention, as well as China's involvement in international peacekeeping. China's pledge of a novel approach to international development holds promise for developing nations; however, it must be understood that China's approach yields similar results to Western aid and more opportunities for misuse.","PeriodicalId":39765,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Peacebuilding and Development","volume":"1 1","pages":"216 - 221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Peacebuilding and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15423166231157435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is lauded as a watershed for stability and African peace by China, while the West cautions their African partners against supposed false promises. Under Xi Jinping, China adopted a “win-win” foreign policy, in which what benefits their partners benefits China and vice versa. Despite these promises, the continent continues to suffer from violence, with the number of armed conflicts continually increasing. At the systemic level, neither the BRI nor the win-win methodology act as bulwarks against either interstate or intrastate conflict, as such the international community must explore the rationale and intentions behind China's renewed involvement in Africa. Through an analysis of Chinese pronouncements and documentation, Chinese and Western academic analysis, and conflict assessment data, the international community can better understand China's views on conflict assessment and prevention, as well as China's involvement in international peacekeeping. China's pledge of a novel approach to international development holds promise for developing nations; however, it must be understood that China's approach yields similar results to Western aid and more opportunities for misuse.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安全与发展是中国非洲战略的两赢——中国非洲安全共赢战略初探
“一带一路”倡议被中国誉为非洲稳定与和平的分水岭,而西方则告诫非洲伙伴不要做出所谓的虚假承诺。尽管有这些承诺,非洲大陆继续遭受暴力之害,武装冲突的数目不断增加。在系统层面上,无论是“一带一路”倡议还是“双赢”策略,都不能抵御国家间或国家内部的冲突,因此,国际社会必须探索中国重新参与非洲事务背后的理由和意图。通过分析中国的声明和文件、中西方的学术分析和冲突评估数据,国际社会可以更好地了解中国对冲突评估和预防的看法,以及中国参与国际维和行动的看法。中国承诺采取新的国际发展方式,这为发展中国家带来了希望;然而,必须明白的是,中国的做法与西方的援助产生了类似的结果,并且有更多的机会被滥用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Peacebuilding and Development
Journal of Peacebuilding and Development Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The Journal of Peacebuilding and Development (JPD) is a new publication for the sharing of critical thinking and constructive action at the intersections of conflict, development and peace. JPD"s authors and editorial staff represent global scholarship, practice and action aiming to develop theory-practice and North South dialogue.
期刊最新文献
Performance Arts in Zimbabwe: Setting the Agenda for Peace and Development Virtual Reality Technologies as PeaceTech: Supporting Ukraine in Practice and Research JPD 18.3 Resources Papuan Voices: Digital Media Usage for Peacebuilding Infrastructure for Peace and Peaceful Elections in Ghana: 2012–2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1