Label information, nutritional composition and screening for bromate in breads sold in Umuahia, Abia State, Nigeria

F. Ugwuona, I. Asogwa, Nwamaka A. Obeta, F. N. Okeke
{"title":"Label information, nutritional composition and screening for bromate in breads sold in Umuahia, Abia State, Nigeria","authors":"F. Ugwuona, I. Asogwa, Nwamaka A. Obeta, F. N. Okeke","doi":"10.4314/as.v21i1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Non-use of potassium bromate in bread making and printing of reproducible nutrition information/claims on bread labels are vital for consumers’ rights and protection in Nigeria. These norms are rarely observed by bread makers in Umuahia. This study evaluated nutrition information on labels, presence of potassium bromate, chemical composition and sensory characteristics of breads sold in Umuahia. Two structured questionnaires were constructed. The first was administered to 15 randomly selected full-time bread vendors in Umuahia metropolis to identify brands of market bread. The second was designed to analyze sensory quality of breads. Five sliced and five unsliced bread samples randomly selected from identified markets were analyzed for sensory properties using a 20-member sensory panelist, and for nutrient and phytochemical composition. Twenty-seven bread samples were identified; all labeled bromate-free, had varying recipes and nutrient claim/information on labels. The bread samples were bromate-free, high in carbohydrate (49.20% in B10 to 65.69% in B8) and moisture (22.67% in B8 to 38.16% in B10), but relatively low in crude protein (6.65% in B3 to 9.45% in B7) and fat (0.26% in B8 to 0.66% in B1). Ash contents ranged from 1.26% in B6 to 1.86% in B3and fiber contents from 1.24% in B2 to 1.76% in B5. Phytonutrients were low; and oxalate content ranged from 0.66 to 0.95%, tannin from 87.78 to 125.40 mg 100g–1 and phytate from 2.02 to 3.03 mg 100g–1. The bread samples had sensory scores ranging from 4.60 to 8.10 for over-all acceptability. They were all acceptable to panelists, but with B1 (sliced) and B8 (unsliced) most acceptable. Bread samples sold in Umuahia were bromate-free, varied in recipe, nutrition claims, and nutrient composition but were acceptable to panelists. ","PeriodicalId":15011,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agro-environmental Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agro-environmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/as.v21i1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Non-use of potassium bromate in bread making and printing of reproducible nutrition information/claims on bread labels are vital for consumers’ rights and protection in Nigeria. These norms are rarely observed by bread makers in Umuahia. This study evaluated nutrition information on labels, presence of potassium bromate, chemical composition and sensory characteristics of breads sold in Umuahia. Two structured questionnaires were constructed. The first was administered to 15 randomly selected full-time bread vendors in Umuahia metropolis to identify brands of market bread. The second was designed to analyze sensory quality of breads. Five sliced and five unsliced bread samples randomly selected from identified markets were analyzed for sensory properties using a 20-member sensory panelist, and for nutrient and phytochemical composition. Twenty-seven bread samples were identified; all labeled bromate-free, had varying recipes and nutrient claim/information on labels. The bread samples were bromate-free, high in carbohydrate (49.20% in B10 to 65.69% in B8) and moisture (22.67% in B8 to 38.16% in B10), but relatively low in crude protein (6.65% in B3 to 9.45% in B7) and fat (0.26% in B8 to 0.66% in B1). Ash contents ranged from 1.26% in B6 to 1.86% in B3and fiber contents from 1.24% in B2 to 1.76% in B5. Phytonutrients were low; and oxalate content ranged from 0.66 to 0.95%, tannin from 87.78 to 125.40 mg 100g–1 and phytate from 2.02 to 3.03 mg 100g–1. The bread samples had sensory scores ranging from 4.60 to 8.10 for over-all acceptability. They were all acceptable to panelists, but with B1 (sliced) and B8 (unsliced) most acceptable. Bread samples sold in Umuahia were bromate-free, varied in recipe, nutrition claims, and nutrient composition but were acceptable to panelists. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
标签信息、营养成分和在尼日利亚阿比亚州乌穆阿希亚出售的面包中溴酸盐的筛选
在尼日利亚,在面包制作中不使用溴酸钾和在面包标签上印刷可重复的营养信息/声称对消费者的权利和保护至关重要。乌穆阿希亚的面包制造商很少遵守这些规范。本研究评估了Umuahia销售的面包标签上的营养信息、溴酸钾的存在、化学成分和感官特性。设计了两份结构化问卷。第一项研究是在乌穆阿希亚市随机选择15个全职面包摊贩,以确定市场面包的品牌。第二个是用来分析面包的感官质量。由20人组成的感官小组对从确定的市场随机选择的5个切片面包和5个未切片面包样品进行了感官特性分析,并对营养和植物化学成分进行了分析。鉴定了27份面包样品;所有标签上都标有不含溴酸盐,标签上有不同的配方和营养声明/信息。该面包不含溴酸盐,碳水化合物(B10为49.20% ~ 65.69%)和水分(B8为22.67% ~ 38.16%)含量较高,粗蛋白质(B3为6.65% ~ B7为9.45%)和脂肪(B8为0.26% ~ B1为0.66%)含量较低。B6的灰分含量为1.26% ~ 1.86%,B5的纤维含量为1.24% ~ 1.76%。植物营养素含量低;草酸含量为0.66 ~ 0.95%,单宁含量为87.78 ~ 125.40 mg 100g-1,植酸含量为2.02 ~ 3.03 mg 100g-1。面包样品的感官评分从4.60到8.10不等,总体可接受性。小组成员都可以接受,但B1(切片)和B8(未切片)是最可以接受的。在Umuahia出售的面包样品不含溴酸盐,配方、营养声明和营养成分各不相同,但小组成员都可以接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Growth and mitotic chromosomes of soybean (Glycine max L. Merril) plants as affected by spent engine oil in sandy-loam soils Determinants of youth participation in agribusiness activities in Ikwuano Local Government Area, Abia State, Nigeria Intensity of palm fruit processing technology-use among palm fruits’ processors in onicha local government area in Ebonyi State, Nigeria Cultural practices and post-harvest handling of selected neglected food crops in south-east and South-south Nigeria Tied ridging enhances soil water conservation and productivity of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1