Safety in Bariatric Patient Transfers

E. Vieira, D. Dyer, L. Richardson, J. Raso
{"title":"Safety in Bariatric Patient Transfers","authors":"E. Vieira, D. Dyer, L. Richardson, J. Raso","doi":"10.2174/1874828700801010048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Bariatric patients are being seen more frequently in health care. Transferring these patients is a challenging and risky task. Objectives: To analyze safety and reduce risks for the musculoskeletal system of bariatric patients and health care workers during transfers from bed to wheelchair and back. Methods: Clinical intervention study of patient transfers using portable and ceiling lifts. The study was conducted in the largest freestanding rehabilitation center in North America. Forty transfers from bed to wheelchair and back involving eight bariatric patients (age: 46-62y, BMI: 42-48kg/m 2 ) were observed systematically, and four were video-recorded to il- lustrate the analysis. Two proactive risk assessments were performed and compared using a scoring system to evaluate the risks during the processes of transfers using portable and ceiling lifts. Results: The bariatric patient transfer system using portable lifts was replaced by installing and using ceiling lifts. The safety of the processes involving the two systems was compared in relation to risk of injuries to staff and patients. Using of ceiling lifts as opposed to portable lifts resulted in 28% reduction of low detectability incidents, 26% reduction of mod- erate effect incidents, and decreased both high and moderate probability incidents (22% and 30% reduction, respectively). Finally, it resulted in approximately 25% reduction on the sum of risk scores for the failure modes and causes requiring action. Conclusions: The results suggest that using ceiling lifts is safer than using portable lifts for bariatric patient transfers. The remaining risks were alleviated by training the staff and elaborating standardized procedures to perform these transfers.","PeriodicalId":88750,"journal":{"name":"The open critical care medicine journal","volume":"17 1","pages":"48-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open critical care medicine journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874828700801010048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Bariatric patients are being seen more frequently in health care. Transferring these patients is a challenging and risky task. Objectives: To analyze safety and reduce risks for the musculoskeletal system of bariatric patients and health care workers during transfers from bed to wheelchair and back. Methods: Clinical intervention study of patient transfers using portable and ceiling lifts. The study was conducted in the largest freestanding rehabilitation center in North America. Forty transfers from bed to wheelchair and back involving eight bariatric patients (age: 46-62y, BMI: 42-48kg/m 2 ) were observed systematically, and four were video-recorded to il- lustrate the analysis. Two proactive risk assessments were performed and compared using a scoring system to evaluate the risks during the processes of transfers using portable and ceiling lifts. Results: The bariatric patient transfer system using portable lifts was replaced by installing and using ceiling lifts. The safety of the processes involving the two systems was compared in relation to risk of injuries to staff and patients. Using of ceiling lifts as opposed to portable lifts resulted in 28% reduction of low detectability incidents, 26% reduction of mod- erate effect incidents, and decreased both high and moderate probability incidents (22% and 30% reduction, respectively). Finally, it resulted in approximately 25% reduction on the sum of risk scores for the failure modes and causes requiring action. Conclusions: The results suggest that using ceiling lifts is safer than using portable lifts for bariatric patient transfers. The remaining risks were alleviated by training the staff and elaborating standardized procedures to perform these transfers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肥胖患者转院的安全性
背景:肥胖患者在医疗保健中越来越常见。转移这些病人是一项具有挑战性和风险的任务。目的:分析肥胖患者和医护人员从床上转到轮椅和背部时肌肉骨骼系统的安全性和降低风险。方法:对便携式升降机和吊顶升降机转移患者进行临床干预研究。这项研究是在北美最大的独立康复中心进行的。系统地观察了8例肥胖患者(年龄:46-62岁,BMI: 42-48kg/ m2)从床到轮椅和背部的40例转移,并对其中4例进行了视频记录以阐明分析结果。进行了两项前瞻性风险评估,并使用评分系统进行了比较,以评估使用便携式升降机和吊顶升降机转移过程中的风险。结果:采用便携式升降机的肥胖患者转运系统被安装和使用吊顶升降机所取代。对涉及这两个系统的过程的安全性与工作人员和患者受伤的风险进行了比较。与手提升降机相比,使用吊顶升降机可使低可侦测性事故减少28%,中等影响事故减少26%,并可减少高及中等可能性事故(分别减少22%及30%)。最后,它导致了大约25%的风险得分的总和减少了失效模式和需要采取行动的原因。结论:结果表明,在肥胖患者转移中使用吊顶升降机比使用便携式升降机更安全。通过培训工作人员和制定执行这些转移的标准化程序,减轻了其余的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Insulin Adsorption to Catheter Materials Used for Intensive Insulin Therapy in Critically Ill Patients: Polyethylene Versus Polyurethane - Possible Cause of Variation in Glucose Control? § Sleep and the ICU Update on Sedation in the Critical Care Unit Blood Pressure Control in Neurological ICU Patients: What is Too High and What is Too Low? A Typical Neurological Presentations in the ICU: Limbic Encephalitis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1