The patterns of nearest neighbor trees in a temperate forest

IF 1.5 4区 农林科学 Q2 FORESTRY Iforest - Biogeosciences and Forestry Pub Date : 2022-08-31 DOI:10.3832/ifor4035-015
X. Chen, K. Bowman
{"title":"The patterns of nearest neighbor trees in a temperate forest","authors":"X. Chen, K. Bowman","doi":"10.3832/ifor4035-015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The nearest neighbor trees (NNTs) are essential for reflecting forest structure and spatial heterogeneity in a forest stand. It is not clear whether different tree species have varied patterns of NNTs in a small area due to biological interactions, whether big trees affect the nearest neighbors for diversity and re-cruitments, or whether a universal linear relationship between the distance of NNTs and their average DBH exists. In this study, the information of NNTs at two plots (each 30 × 100 m) in a temperate mixed broadleaved forest in Southern USA was collected by field survey. Our results indicated that approximately 80% of NNTs were within a distance of 1.5-4.0 m. Tulip poplar, oaks, and hickory trees did not have the same species as NNTs or were very limited. Carolina buckthorn had itself as an NNT but with fewer other species. Sugar maple could serve as the NNT for oaks, hickory and others. The relationships between the distance of an NNT and its cumulative percentage were different among varied species or groups. Overall, for trees and their NNTs, there existed complicated relationships between their sizes ( e.g. , height and DBH). Big trees might affect NNTs in diversity and recruitment. The suggested linear relationship between tree size and distance was not observed. The results could be helpful to manage forest structure (tree species and NNT) and provide evi-dence to improve the scaling theory on NNTs.","PeriodicalId":13323,"journal":{"name":"Iforest - Biogeosciences and Forestry","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iforest - Biogeosciences and Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor4035-015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The nearest neighbor trees (NNTs) are essential for reflecting forest structure and spatial heterogeneity in a forest stand. It is not clear whether different tree species have varied patterns of NNTs in a small area due to biological interactions, whether big trees affect the nearest neighbors for diversity and re-cruitments, or whether a universal linear relationship between the distance of NNTs and their average DBH exists. In this study, the information of NNTs at two plots (each 30 × 100 m) in a temperate mixed broadleaved forest in Southern USA was collected by field survey. Our results indicated that approximately 80% of NNTs were within a distance of 1.5-4.0 m. Tulip poplar, oaks, and hickory trees did not have the same species as NNTs or were very limited. Carolina buckthorn had itself as an NNT but with fewer other species. Sugar maple could serve as the NNT for oaks, hickory and others. The relationships between the distance of an NNT and its cumulative percentage were different among varied species or groups. Overall, for trees and their NNTs, there existed complicated relationships between their sizes ( e.g. , height and DBH). Big trees might affect NNTs in diversity and recruitment. The suggested linear relationship between tree size and distance was not observed. The results could be helpful to manage forest structure (tree species and NNT) and provide evi-dence to improve the scaling theory on NNTs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
温带森林中最邻近树木的形态
最近邻居树(nnt)是反映林分结构和空间异质性的关键。目前尚不清楚不同树种是否由于生物相互作用而在小范围内具有不同的nnt模式,大树是否影响最近邻居的多样性和重新招募,或者nnt距离与其平均胸径之间是否存在普遍的线性关系。本研究通过野外调查收集了美国南部温带混交林2个样地(各30 × 100 m) nnt的信息。结果表明,约80%的nnt分布在1.5-4.0 m范围内。郁金香、杨树、橡树和山核桃树与nnt没有相同的物种,或者非常有限。卡罗莱纳鼠李本身是NNT,但其他物种较少。糖枫可以作为橡树、山核桃树和其他树的NNT。不同种、不同类群间NNT距离与其累积百分比的关系不同。总体而言,对于树木及其nnt,它们的大小(如高度和胸径)之间存在复杂的关系。大树可能会影响nnt的多样性和招募。没有观察到树的大小和距离之间的线性关系。研究结果可为森林结构(树种和NNT)的管理提供依据,并为改进NNT的标度理论提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The journal encompasses a broad range of research aspects concerning forest science: forest ecology, biodiversity/genetics and ecophysiology, silviculture, forest inventory and planning, forest protection and monitoring, forest harvesting, landscape ecology, forest history, wood technology.
期刊最新文献
How biomass and other tree architectural characteristics relate to the structural complexity of a beech-pine forest Performance assessment of two plotless sampling methods for density estimation applied to some Alpine forests of northeastern Italy A WebGIS tool to support forest management at regional and local scale Variations in the performance of hybrid poplars subjected to the inoculation of a microbial consortium and water restriction Effects of silvicultural thinning on stand structure and coarse woody debris in the deciduous Arasbaran forest, Iran
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1