Sulla datazione della Apocolocyntosis.

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY AEVUM-RASSEGNA DI SCIENZE STORICHE LINGUISTICHE E FILOLOGICHE Pub Date : 2008-01-01 DOI:10.1400/175568
D. Fasolini
{"title":"Sulla datazione della Apocolocyntosis.","authors":"D. Fasolini","doi":"10.1400/175568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The reasons underlying the composition and dating of the Apocolocyntosis, a satirical pamphlet traditionally ascribed to Seneca, are debated. Among its manifold aims (parody of Claudius' divinization? Nero's political manifesto? Attack against Agrippina?) the analysis of some passages points to that of discrediting Agrippina in the eyes of his son. With regard to the dating the author's polemic intent against Agrippina would suggest that the Apocolocyntosis was written before her death (A.D. 59), whereas the highly violenct tone leads to the conclusion that it cannot have been composed in the earliest years of Nero's reign, when Agrippina still had considerable influence.","PeriodicalId":55949,"journal":{"name":"AEVUM-RASSEGNA DI SCIENZE STORICHE LINGUISTICHE E FILOLOGICHE","volume":"57 1","pages":"127-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEVUM-RASSEGNA DI SCIENZE STORICHE LINGUISTICHE E FILOLOGICHE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1400/175568","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The reasons underlying the composition and dating of the Apocolocyntosis, a satirical pamphlet traditionally ascribed to Seneca, are debated. Among its manifold aims (parody of Claudius' divinization? Nero's political manifesto? Attack against Agrippina?) the analysis of some passages points to that of discrediting Agrippina in the eyes of his son. With regard to the dating the author's polemic intent against Agrippina would suggest that the Apocolocyntosis was written before her death (A.D. 59), whereas the highly violenct tone leads to the conclusion that it cannot have been composed in the earliest years of Nero's reign, when Agrippina still had considerable influence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于经外辛托sis的日期。
潜在的原因组成和日期的Apocolocyntosis,一个讽刺的小册子,传统上归因于塞内加,是有争议的。在其众多目标中(模仿克劳狄的神化?尼禄的政治宣言?对阿格里皮娜的攻击?),对一些段落的分析指向了阿格里皮娜在他儿子眼中的名誉受损。关于日期,作者对阿格里皮娜的争论意图表明,《启示录》是在她去世前(公元59年)写的,而高度暴力的语气导致结论,它不可能是在尼禄统治的早期创作的,当时阿格里皮娜仍然有相当大的影响力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A survey of the manuscripts of Augustine's De Civitate Dei : new acquisitions El tercer hombre. Leócrates, Macedonia y el oscuro amintas The Athens of the North? Scotland and the national struggle for the Parthenon, its marbles, and its identity È esistita l’epidikasia arghias? Considerazioni intorno a Anecd. Graeca I 310, 1-5 Rediscovering Theopompos : Neglected Evidence of the Meropis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1