Stress of COVID-19 and mental health outcomes in Palestine: the mediating role of well-being and resilience.

Q1 Arts and Humanities History in Africa Pub Date : 2021-03-15 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.5114/hpr.2021.104490
Guido Veronese, Fayez Mahamid, Dana Bdier, Rachel Pancake
{"title":"Stress of COVID-19 and mental health outcomes in Palestine: the mediating role of well-being and resilience.","authors":"Guido Veronese, Fayez Mahamid, Dana Bdier, Rachel Pancake","doi":"10.5114/hpr.2021.104490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We tested the association between the stress of COVID-19 and mental distress manifested by anxiety, depression, and stress, and whether well-being and resilience mediate the relationship between the two variables in a population of Palestinian adults. Namely, we hypothesized that stress of COVID-19 will be positively associated with mental health problems (anxiety, depression, and stress); well-being and resilience will be negatively associated with mental health problems (anxiety, depression, and stress); and well-being and resilience will mediate the association between the stress of COVID-19 and mental health problems (anxiety, depression, and stress).</p><p><strong>Participants and procedure: </strong>Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21, the Resilience Scale for Adults, the WHO-5 Well-Being Index, and the COVID-19 Stress Scales were administered to 860 participants via online survey. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was applied to address the study hypothesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants recorded a mild level of stress of COVID-19 and high scores for resilience and well-being. A conceptual model depicting COVID-19 stress as a predictor, mental distress as an outcome variable, and resilience and subjective well-being as mediators was confirmed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Palestinians are exposed to mental distress in an environment characterized by ongoing stressors. Conversely, the capability of Palestinians to conserve good levels of well-being and resilience protects them from mental distress even in the wake of the COVID-19 outbreak. On the other hand, COVID-19 can be considered a new critical event demanding and diminishing the people's resiliency recourses in Palestine. Implications for clinical practice and research are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":39318,"journal":{"name":"History in Africa","volume":"18 1","pages":"389-410"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10687527/pdf/","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History in Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/hpr.2021.104490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

Background: We tested the association between the stress of COVID-19 and mental distress manifested by anxiety, depression, and stress, and whether well-being and resilience mediate the relationship between the two variables in a population of Palestinian adults. Namely, we hypothesized that stress of COVID-19 will be positively associated with mental health problems (anxiety, depression, and stress); well-being and resilience will be negatively associated with mental health problems (anxiety, depression, and stress); and well-being and resilience will mediate the association between the stress of COVID-19 and mental health problems (anxiety, depression, and stress).

Participants and procedure: Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21, the Resilience Scale for Adults, the WHO-5 Well-Being Index, and the COVID-19 Stress Scales were administered to 860 participants via online survey. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was applied to address the study hypothesis.

Results: Participants recorded a mild level of stress of COVID-19 and high scores for resilience and well-being. A conceptual model depicting COVID-19 stress as a predictor, mental distress as an outcome variable, and resilience and subjective well-being as mediators was confirmed.

Conclusions: Palestinians are exposed to mental distress in an environment characterized by ongoing stressors. Conversely, the capability of Palestinians to conserve good levels of well-being and resilience protects them from mental distress even in the wake of the COVID-19 outbreak. On the other hand, COVID-19 can be considered a new critical event demanding and diminishing the people's resiliency recourses in Palestine. Implications for clinical practice and research are discussed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 的压力与巴勒斯坦的心理健康结果:幸福感和复原力的中介作用。
背景:我们测试了 COVID-19 的压力与表现为焦虑、抑郁和压力的精神痛苦之间的关系,以及在巴勒斯坦成年人群体中,幸福感和恢复力是否会调节这两个变量之间的关系。也就是说,我们假设 COVID-19 的压力与心理健康问题(焦虑、抑郁和压力)呈正相关;幸福感和复原力与心理健康问题(焦虑、抑郁和压力)呈负相关;幸福感和复原力将介导 COVID-19 的压力与心理健康问题(焦虑、抑郁和压力)之间的关系:通过在线调查对 860 名参与者进行了抑郁、焦虑和压力量表-21、成人复原力量表、WHO-5 幸福指数和 COVID-19 压力量表的测试。研究采用结构方程模型(SEM)来解决研究假设:结果:参与者的 COVID-19 压力水平较轻,而复原力和幸福感得分较高。一个以 COVID-19 压力为预测因子,以精神压力为结果变量,以恢复力和主观幸福感为中介的概念模型得到了证实:结论:巴勒斯坦人在压力持续不断的环境中面临精神压力。相反,即使在 COVID-19 爆发后,巴勒斯坦人保持良好的幸福感和复原力的能力也能保护他们免受精神痛苦。另一方面,COVID-19 可以被视为一个新的关键事件,它要求并削弱了巴勒斯坦人民的恢复能力。本文讨论了对临床实践和研究的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
History in Africa
History in Africa Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
A Tapestry of Human-Induced and Climate-Driven Environmental Change in Western Uganda: The Ndali Crater Lakes Region Writing a Colonial Legal History of Northern Nigeria: An Analysis of Methods and Sources Cyber History: Homespun Historians, Ethnonationalism, and Recasting Yorùbá Oral Traditions in the Age of Social Media A Class of Their Own: Newspaper Obituaries and the Colonial Public Sphere in Lagos, 1880–1920 Wiriyamu and the Colonial Archive: Reading It Against the Grain? Along the Grain? Read It at All! – ERRATUM
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1