How to develop students’ approaches to learning: Experiences from a programme based on co-regulated learning

IF 0.2 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Zbornik Instituta za Pedagoska Istrazivanja Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI:10.2298/zipi1702170s
Milan Stančić, Marija M. Bulatović
{"title":"How to develop students’ approaches to learning: Experiences from a programme based on co-regulated learning","authors":"Milan Stančić, Marija M. Bulatović","doi":"10.2298/zipi1702170s","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Starting from the insight that during their education students do not manage to learn how to learn, we created the programme called Blooming with the intention of ena-bling the students to reconsider their own approaches to learning by developing collaborative activities and relations in the classroom. The programme was realised in a secondary school class, and research goals were to explore the contribution of the programme to the change in students’ approach to learning – regarding the learning motivation and strategies – and to obtain an insight into students’ perspective of the benefits of the programme. The changes in learning strategies and students’ motivation were investigated using the MSLQ before and after programme attendance. The data on the programme benefits were obtained via focus groups with students and analysed by the thematic content analysis. It has been established that the students achieved a significant improvement when it comes to the mastering of the learning strategies that refer to self-regulation, critical thinking, peer learning and help seeking. In addition, the students pointed out as benefits a different method of work and pleasant atmosphere, the feeling of autonomy in classes, as well as the development of a different understanding of the nature of knowledge, the learning process and instruction. The results indicate that the use of Bloom’s taxonomy as the tool for co-regulated learning and self-evaluation of students can contribute to the change in students’ learning approaches. This finding is relevant for further considering of the possibility for this method to grow from a special programme into everyday teaching practice.","PeriodicalId":42259,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Instituta za Pedagoska Istrazivanja","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Instituta za Pedagoska Istrazivanja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/zipi1702170s","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Starting from the insight that during their education students do not manage to learn how to learn, we created the programme called Blooming with the intention of ena-bling the students to reconsider their own approaches to learning by developing collaborative activities and relations in the classroom. The programme was realised in a secondary school class, and research goals were to explore the contribution of the programme to the change in students’ approach to learning – regarding the learning motivation and strategies – and to obtain an insight into students’ perspective of the benefits of the programme. The changes in learning strategies and students’ motivation were investigated using the MSLQ before and after programme attendance. The data on the programme benefits were obtained via focus groups with students and analysed by the thematic content analysis. It has been established that the students achieved a significant improvement when it comes to the mastering of the learning strategies that refer to self-regulation, critical thinking, peer learning and help seeking. In addition, the students pointed out as benefits a different method of work and pleasant atmosphere, the feeling of autonomy in classes, as well as the development of a different understanding of the nature of knowledge, the learning process and instruction. The results indicate that the use of Bloom’s taxonomy as the tool for co-regulated learning and self-evaluation of students can contribute to the change in students’ learning approaches. This finding is relevant for further considering of the possibility for this method to grow from a special programme into everyday teaching practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何培养学生的学习方法:基于共同调节学习的课程的经验
基于学生在教育过程中无法学会如何学习的认识,我们创建了一个名为“盛开”的项目,旨在通过在课堂上开展合作活动和关系,让学生重新考虑自己的学习方法。该计划是在一个中学班级中实施的,研究目标是探索该计划对学生学习方法的改变的贡献——关于学习动机和策略——并深入了解学生对该计划的好处的看法。使用MSLQ调查了学生参加课程前后学习策略和动机的变化。关于方案效益的数据是通过学生焦点小组获得的,并通过专题内容分析进行分析。结果表明,学生在自我调节、批判性思维、同伴学习和寻求帮助等学习策略的掌握上有了显著的提高。此外,学生们指出,不同的工作方法和愉快的氛围,在课堂上的自主感,以及对知识本质、学习过程和教学的不同理解的发展,都是有益的。结果表明,使用Bloom分类法作为协同调节学生学习和自我评价的工具,有助于学生学习方式的改变。这一发现与进一步考虑这种方法从一个特殊程序发展到日常教学实践的可能性有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Zbornik Instituta za Pedagoska Istrazivanja
Zbornik Instituta za Pedagoska Istrazivanja EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Characteristics of play interaction in twins with autism spectrum disorder A phenomenological analysis of teacher experiences during professional learning on the implementation of the question formulation technique Scaffolding the learning during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic - secondary school students’ perspective Teachers’ diversity awareness and critical consciousness - sine qua non of social justice in schools Modeling the relationships between transformational leadership, teacher academic optimism, and teacher engagement: Evidence from the Serbian school context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1